Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Finding volume of a segment


I'm still pretty new to Mathematica, so I would like to seek advice regarding a geometrical problem.


I am currently trying to define that as an extra condition in the Mathematica code below.


  reg = ImplicitRegion[x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 + z^2/c^2 <= 1 {z, y, x}];
Volume[reg, Assumptions -> a > 0 && b > 0 && c > 0]

Any one has any idea how to incorporate it into the extra conditions in defining the implicit region?




Answer



Let you have a vector p, which is perpendicular to the plane and an ellipsoid with axes (a,b,c). The illustration (2D for simplicity):


enter image description here


Mathematica can calculate the numeric value of the clipped volume easily


Nvolume[p_, abc_] := Volume[RegionIntersection[
ImplicitRegion[{x, y, z}.N[p] > 0, {x, y, z}],
Ellipsoid[N[abc] {1, 0, 0}, N[abc]]]]

p = RandomReal[{-1, 1}, 3];
abc = RandomReal[{1, 2}, 3];


Nvolume[p, abc]
(* 16.2584 *)

Mathematica cannot derive the general formula, but it isn't difficult to derive manually. Let us introduce new coordinates


x′=x/a,y′=y/b,z′=z/c.


In these coordinates the ellipsoid becomes the unit ball


enter image description here


The Jacobian of this transformation is J=abc. In the new coordinates the normalized perpendicular vector is


n=(apx,bpy,cpz)√a2p2x+b2p2y+c2p2z.



Now it is simple to integrate the volume along the axis ξ because the cross section is a circle


V=abc∫1−nxπ(1−ξ2)dξ=πabc(23+nx−n3x3)


volume[p_, abc_] := π Times @@ abc (2/3 + # - #^3/3) &@@ Normalize[abc p]

volume[p, abc]
(* 16.2584 *)

The result is the same.




Update: OP asks also about the area of the intersection. It is also an interesting question.



Mathematica region functionality is very powerful for numerical computations:


Narea[p_, abc_] := Area[RegionIntersection[ImplicitRegion[{x, y, z}.N[p] == 0, {x, y, z}], 
Ellipsoid[N[abc] {1, 0, 0}, N[abc]]]]

Narea[p, abc]
(* 6.20243 *)

The analytic formula can be derived using the Dirac δ-function
A=∫ellipseδ(r⋅pp)dr=abcp∫unit ballδ(x′apx+y′bpy+z′cpz)dr′=abcp√a2p2x+b2p2y+c2p2z∫unit ballδ(r′⋅n)dr′.

It is the cross section of the unit ball. Hence A=πabcp(1−n2x)√a2p2x+b2p2y+c2p2z.


area[p_, abc_] := π Times @@ abc (1 - #^2) & @@ Normalize[abc p] Norm[p]/Norm[abc p];


area[p, abc]
(* 6.20243 *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...