Skip to main content

Plotting ListLinePlots together creating a 3D view



I have a *.xlsx file containing four columns, each pair representing an x and y value, so (from left to right): x_sample1, y_sample1, x_sample2, y_sample2.


What I wanted to do, is put them in a ListLinePlot (or something similar) next to each other in a 3-D view. I managed to get what I wanted using ListPointPlot, but a continuous line for each sample would look better for my purposes. ListPointPlot (to my knowledge) only let me use Filling to simulate a more continuous, solid look - but that doesn't really cut it. Attached below is a picture of what I did so far and how the general look of it should be. enter image description here


I used a (rather ugly) workaround to get this to work: for each plot I added an artificial x value named "row" in integer values from 1-14 and these were followed by the original plot data corresponding to y and z data for this plot.


The code I used is:


ListPointPlot3D[{exceldaten[[All, {1, 2, 3}]], exceldaten[[All, {4, 5, 6}]], 
          exceldaten[[All, {7, 8, 9}]], exceldaten[[All, {10, 11, 12}]],
          exceldaten[[All, {13, 14, 15}]], exceldaten[[All, {16, 17, 18}]], 
          exceldaten[[All, {19, 20, 21}]], exceldaten[[All, {22, 23, 24}]], 
          exceldaten[[All, {25, 26, 27}]], exceldaten[[All, {28, 29, 30}]], 
          exceldaten[[All, {31, 32, 33}]], exceldaten[[All, {34, 35, 36}]], 

          exceldaten[[All, {37, 38, 39}]], exceldaten[[All, {40, 41, 42}]]}, 
     PlotRange -> {{0.5, 14.5}, {0.0002, 0.0006}, {0, 50000}}, 
     Filling -> Axis, FillingStyle -> Automatic, Axes -> {False, True,True}, 
     AxesLabel -> {None, "mobility (corresponding unit)", "cps"}, 
     Ticks -> {header[[3 ;; 42 ;; 3]], Automatic, Automatic}, 
     LabelStyle -> Directive[Bold, Medium], PlotLegends -> header[[3 ;; 42 ;; 3]]]


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more