Skip to main content

interpolation - Extracting the function from InterpolatingFunction object



I've used Interpolation[] to generate an InterpolatingFunction object from a list of integers.


f = Interpolation[{2, 5, 9, 15, 22, 33, 50, 70, 100, 145, 200, 280, 375, 495, 635, 800,
                   1000, 1300, 1600, 2000, 2450, 3050, 3750, 4600, 5650, 6950}]

I'm using that to generate values like f[27], f[28], ...


Is there any way to print or show the function used by Mathematica that produced the result of f[27]?



Answer



Here is the example from the documentation adapted for the OP's data:


data = MapIndexed[
   Flatten[{#2, #1}] &,

   {2, 5, 9, 15, 22, 33, 50, 70, 100, 145, 200, 280, 375, 495, 635, 800,
    1000, 1300, 1600, 2000, 2450, 3050, 3750, 4600, 5650, 6950}];
f = Interpolation@data


(* InterpolatingFunction[{{1, 26}}, <>] *)

pwf = Piecewise[
     Map[{InterpolatingPolynomial[#, x], x < #[[3, 1]]} &, Most[#]], 
     InterpolatingPolynomial[Last@#, x]] &@Partition[data, 4, 1];


Here is a comparison of the piecewise interpolating polynomials and the interpolating function:


Plot[f[x] - pwf, {x, 1, 28}, PlotRange -> All]

Mathematica graphics


The values of f[27] and f[28] are beyond the domain, which is 1 <= x <= 26, and extrapolation is used. The formula for extrapolation is given by the last InterpolatingPolynomial in pwf:


Last@pwf
(* 3750 + (850 + (100 + 25/3 (-25 + x)) (-24 + x)) (-23 + x) *)



In response to a comment: The error in the plot has to do with round-off error. Apparently the calculation done by InterpolatingFunction, while algebraically equivalent, is not numerically identical. The error was greatest above in the domain 26 < x < 28 where extrapolation is performed. With arbitrary precision, the error is zero, as shown below.


Plot[f[x] - pwf, {x, 1, 28}, PlotRange -> All, 
 WorkingPrecision -> $MachinePrecision, Exclusions -> None, PlotStyle -> Red]

Mathematica graphics


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more