Skip to main content

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs


I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data.


I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in enter image description here



but then using proper perspective.


In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes.


Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage).


(* some test data *)
data = Table[Null, {i, 4}];
data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 
   4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 
   1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.0}, {4, 0.03}, {5, 
   2.8}};  (* data on logit(proportion) scale *)
data[[2]] = ((data[[1]] // Transpose))*{1, 0.8} // Transpose; 

data[[3]] = ((data[[1]] // Transpose))*{1, 0.6} // Transpose; 
data[[4]] = ((data[[1]] // Transpose))*{1, 0.4} // 
  Transpose; (* data points groups 1-4 on logit(proportion) scale *)
Logit[p_] = Log[p/(1 - p)];
Invlogit[x_] = Exp[x]/(1 + Exp[x]);
datalog = Table[Null, {i, 4}];
Do[datalog[[i]] = 
   Partition[
    Riffle[(data[[i]] // Transpose)[[1]], 
     Log10[100*Invlogit[(data[[i]] // Transpose)[[2]]]]], 2], {i, 1, 

   4}];

(* fit function plus best fit & conf lims *)
fitfunc[t_, z_, Z_, p0_, s_] := 
  z + (p0 (z - Z))/(-p0 + (-1 + p0) (1/(1 + s))^t);
predicted = 
  Table[NonlinearModelFit[
    dat[[i]], {fitfunc[t, z, Z, p0, s]}, {{Z, 0.46}, {s, 20}, {p0, 
      0.0005}, {z, -6.4}}, t, MaxIterations -> 1000, 
    Method -> "LevenbergMarquardt"], {i, 4}];

pred[t_, i_] := Normal[predicted[[i]]];
conflims[t_, i_] := predicted[[i]]["MeanPredictionBands"];

Answer



You could make 2d plot and then convert 2d coord to 3d:


data1 = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 
    4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 
    1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.0}, {4, 0.03}, {5, 2.8}};

data = Table[{1, 1.2 - j*.2} i, {j, 4}, {i, data1}];


Logit[p_] = Log[p/(1 - p)];
Invlogit[x_] = Exp[x]/(1 + Exp[x]);
datalog = Table[Null, {i, 4}];

datalog = 
  Table[Transpose[{#1, Log10[100 Invlogit[#2]]} & @@ 
     Transpose[data[[i]]]], {i, 1, 4}];

fitfunc[t_, z_, Z_, p0_, s_] := 
  z + (p0 (z - Z))/(-p0 + (-1 + p0) (1/(1 + s))^t);


predicted = 
  Table[NonlinearModelFit[
    data[[i]], {fitfunc[t, z, Z, p0, s], 
     Z > z && Z < 5 && s > 1 && s < 200 && p0 < 0.01 && p0 > 0 && 
      z < -2 && z > -7}, {{Z, 0.3}, {s, 20}, {p0, 0.001}, {z, -6.5}}, 
    t, MaxIterations -> 1000], {i, 4}];

pred[t_, i_] := Normal[predicted[[i]]];
conflims[t_, i_] := predicted[[i]]["MeanPredictionBands"];


cols = {Red, Darker[Green], Blue, Darker[Cyan]};

opac = 0.4;
colslight = {Directive[cols[[1]], Opacity[opac]], 
   Directive[cols[[2]], Opacity[opac]], 
   Directive[cols[[3]], Opacity[opac]], 
   Directive[cols[[4]], Opacity[opac]]};

Graphics3D[

 Table[{Plot[{Log10[100*Invlogit[pred[t, i]]], 
       Evaluate[N@Log10[100*Invlogit[conflims[t, i]]]]}, {t, 1, 5}, 
      Filling -> {2 -> {{1}, {colslight[[i]]}}, 
        3 -> {{1}, {colslight[[i]]}}}, 
      PlotStyle -> {cols[[i]], colslight[[i]], 
        colslight[[i]]}][[1]], {cols[[i]], PointSize[0.012], 
     Point[datalog[[i]]]}} /. {x_?NumericQ, y_?NumericQ} :> {x, i, 
     y}, {i, 1, 4}], 
    Axes -> {True, False, True}, 
    Boxed -> {Right, Bottom, Back}, 

    BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 0.5}, 
    FaceGrids -> {{0, 0, -1}, {0, 1, 0}, {1, 0, 0}}, 
    FaceGridsStyle -> 
  Directive[GrayLevel[0.3, 1], AbsoluteDashing[{1, 2}]],
 ViewPoint -> {-2, -2.5, 1}, 
 AxesLabel -> {"Day", "", 
   Rotate[Row[{Spacer[50], "Resistance (%)"}], 90 Degree]},
 LabelStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 14],
 ImageSize -> 500
   ]


enter image description here


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more