Skip to main content

plotting - flipping y axis



I know that some topics were created for this subject but any solution works for me. I would like to reverse the y axis. By this I mean that I would like to have the highest values at the bottom and the lowest at the top.


Here is a minimal example: x = Table[Log[10, minimal[[i, 2]]], {i, 1, Length[minimal]}] y = Table[minimal[[i, 11]], {i, 1, Length[minimal]}] error = Table[Log[10, minimal[[i, 3]]], {i, 1, Length[minimal]}] giving: {0.959041, 1.0406, 0.590188, 0.576065} {-19.7381, -12.479, -18.8248, -17.4789} {1.01921, 0.385606, 0.737037, -0.146194}


The third list is the errors corresponding to the values in the first list. I use now ErrorListPlot:


minimalplot = ErrorListPlot[Table[{{x[[i]], y[[i]]}, ErrorBar[error[[i]]]}, {i, 1, 
Length[minimal]}], Frame -> True, ImageSize -> Large]

And I get this: The problem is that the highest y value (-12.479) is at the top of the y axis by default and the lowest (-19.7381) is at the bottom.


I know that ScalingFunctions work with Plot and ListPlot but it doesn't work with ErrorListPlot; otherwise it would have been easy.


If needed, I am using Mathematica 10.1.


Thanks in advance, regards



Jean-Philippe


PS: Here is the content of minimal (which is an imported simplified data file):


{{0.0626294, 9.1, 10.4523, 7.9, 0.52, 9.75, 12.73, 1.59, 9.21, 8.49, -19.7381}, {0.154463, 10.98, 2.43, 0.9158, 0.25, 12.33, 13.73, 2.05, 7.59, 8.28, -12.479}, {0.0772834, 3.89214, 5.45804, 1.1667, 0.09, 6.51, 11.78, 1.22, 8.47, 8, -18.8248}, {0.084189, 3.7676, 0.714178, 0.9589, 0.64, 7.43, 9.85, 1.92, 8.07, 7.77, -17.4789}}




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...
Post a Comment
Read more