Skip to main content

graphics - find the maximum number of not intersecting circles inside an ellipse


$Version


"10.3.0 for Linux x86 (64-bit) (October 9, 2015)"



(Sequel to 98724 and 99345)


(I use codes originally created by Andy Ross, ybeltukov and J.M.).



I am wondering if one can find the maximum number of randomly generated circles inside a given ellipse.


Using the function findPoints defined below


findPoints = 
Compile[{{n, _Integer}, {low, _Real}, {high, _Real}, {minD, _Real}},
Block[{data = RandomReal[{low, high}, {1, 2}], k = 1, rv, temp},
While[k < n, rv = RandomReal[{low, high}, 2];
temp = Transpose[Transpose[data] - rv];
If[Min[Sqrt[(#.#)] & /@ temp] > minD, data = Join[data, {rv}];
k++;];];
data]];


and taking


npts = 150;(*number of points*)
r = 0.03;(*radius of the circles*)
minD = 2.2 r;(*minimum distance in terms of the radius*)
low = 0; (*unit square*)
high = 1;(*unit square*)

ep = With[{a = 2/5, b = 1/2},
BoundaryDiscretizeRegion@

ParametricRegion[(low + high) {1, 1}/2 +
c ({a Cos[t], b Sin[t]} +
r Normalize[Cross[D[{a Cos[t], b Sin[t]}, t]]]), {{c, 0,
1}, {t, 0, 2 \[Pi]}}]];

SeedRandom[159];
pts = Select[findPoints[npts, low, high, minD], RegionMember[ep, #] &];
g2d = Graphics[{Disk[#, r] & /@ pts, Circle[{1/2, 1/2}, {2/5, 1/2}]},
PlotRange -> All, Frame -> True]


we get


enter image description here


and 72 circles (disks) are lying within the ellipse.


pts // Length
(*72*)

Now I increase progressively the number npts.


npts = 160;

SeedRandom[159];

pts = Select[findPoints[npts, low, high, minD],
RegionMember[ep, #] &] // Length
(*80*)

npts = 170;

SeedRandom[159];
Timing[(pts = Select[findPoints[npts, low, high, minD],
RegionMember[ep, #] &] )// Length]
(*{8.23561, 87}*)


npts = 171;
r = 0.03;
minD = 2.2 r;
low = 0;
high = 1;

SeedRandom[159];
Timing[(pts =
Select[findPoints[npts, low, high, minD],

RegionMember[ep, #] &]) // Length]

(*{12.7237, 87}*)

I guess that we have reach a plateau as it is clear below.


    g2d = Graphics[{Disk[#, r] & /@ pts, Circle[{1/2, 1/2}, {2/5, 1/2}]}, 
PlotRange -> All, Frame -> True]

enter image description here


My question now is how we can use Mathematica in order to extract the maximum number of not intersecting circles withing an ellipse?



Thank you very much.



Answer



The problem consists of two questions: how to determine if circle is inside the ellipse and how to maximize the number of circles?


1. Circle is inside the ellipse?


Let us show that the region of possible circle centers are bounded by a parallel curve of degree 8.


ClearAll[x, y, a, b, r];
eq1 = Simplify[RegionDistance[Disk[{0, 0}, {a, b}], {x, y}]^2 == r^2,
x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 > 1]

enter image description here



RegionDistance gives distance outside the ellipse, but it doesn't matter now. Now we can eliminate Root:


pointInEllipse[x_, y_, a_, b_] = 1 - x^2/a^2 - y^2/b^2;
circleNotIntersectEllipse[x_, y_, a_, b_, r_] =
FullSimplify@*Subtract @@
Eliminate[{eq1 /. _Root -> q,
FirstCase[eq1, Root[eq_, _] :> eq@q == 0, , ∞]}, q]

enter image description here


The last formula is positive when the circle doesn't intersect the ellipse. Now we can visualize the obtained region for different values of the circle radius


a = 2;

b = 1;
RegionPlot[Evaluate@
Table[circleNotIntersectEllipse[x, y, a, b, r] > 0 &&
pointInEllipse[x, y, a, b] > 0, {r, 0.2, 1, 0.2}], {x, -1.1 a,
1.1 a}, {y, -1.1 b, 1.1 b}, PlotPoints -> 60, Epilog -> Circle[{0, 0}, {a, b}],
AspectRatio -> Automatic]

enter image description here


There are some glitches, but they appear only for unreasonable big values of the radius.




I think that the circle packing is the good starting point


r = 0.1;
{x, y} = Transpose@Join[Tuples@{##}, Tuples@{# + r, #2 + Sqrt[3] r}] &[
Range[-#, #, 2 r], Range[-#, #, Sqrt[3] 2 r]] &@Max[a, b];
RegionPlot[circleNotIntersectEllipse[x, y, a, b, r] > 0 &&
pointInEllipse[x, y, a, b] > 0, {x, -1.1 a, 1.1 a}, {y, -1.1 b, 1.1 b},
PlotPoints -> 60, Epilog -> {Circle[{0, 0}, {a, b}], Point@Transpose@{x, y}},
AspectRatio -> Automatic]

enter image description here



Points inside the blue region show possible circle centers. Now we have to find the best translation and orientation of the circle packing


transform[x0_, 
y0_, φ_] := {{Cos[φ], Sin[φ]}, {-Sin[φ],
Cos[φ]}}.{x, y} + {x0, y0};
inside[x0_, y0_, φ_] :=
UnitStep[circleNotIntersectEllipse[##, a, b, r], pointInEllipse[##, a, b]] & @@
transform[x0, y0, φ]
func[x0_?NumericQ, y0_?NumericQ, φ_?NumericQ] :=
Total@inside[x0, y0, φ];


{x1, y1, φ1} =
NArgMax[func[x0, y0, φ0], {x0, y0, φ0}]
(* {-0.327895, 0.286679, -0.290644} *)

circles =
Pick[Transpose@transform[x1, y1, φ1], inside[x1, y1, φ1], 1];
Length@circles
(* 160 *)

The number of circles is close to the theoretical prediction from Thies Heidecke's answer



Ï€/2/Sqrt[3] a b/r^2
(* 181.38 *)

Finally, we can plot the result packing


Graphics[{Circle[{0, 0}, {a, b}], Lighter@Blue, Disk[#, r] & /@ circles}]

enter image description here


May be there is possibility to insert one or two circles more, but it requires much more advanced technique.


P.S. The order of evaluation matters. For simplicity I omit some scoping constrictions.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...