Skip to main content

manipulate - Trouble understanding TrackedSymbols


While developing a relatively complex demonstration for Manipulate I encountered the problem that my output was unintentionally self-updating in an endless loop.


After some digging I discovered the problem is probably related with the following minimal code:


date = DateObject[{2014, 12, 31, 0, 0, 0}];
Dynamic[GeoGraphics[NightHemisphere[date], GeoRange -> "World"],
SynchronousUpdating -> False]

Because the date is fixed I honestly cannot see any reason why this is self-updating in an infinte loop.


First question. Why this happens?



To stop this behavior we can modify the code as:


date = DateObject[{2014, 12, 31, 0, 0, 0}];
Dynamic[GeoGraphics[NightHemisphere[date], GeoRange -> "World"],
TrackedSymbols :> {date}, SynchronousUpdating -> False]

In the real case things are more complex because I have to explicitly list and keep updated a list of many symbols. Things are more complex also because with nested Dynamic the following code doesn't prevent the self-updating:


date = DateObject[{2014, 12, 31, 0, 0, 0}];
Dynamic[{
date, Dynamic[
GeoGraphics[NightHemisphere[date], GeoRange -> "World"],

TrackedSymbols :> Automatic, SynchronousUpdating -> False]
}, TrackedSymbols :> {date}, SynchronousUpdating -> False]

I read many time the advanced documentation of Manipulate and Dynamic, and my understanding was the inner Dynamic should inherits TrackedSymbols from the outer Dynamic.


Second question. Is that true?


Of course this is safe:


date = DateObject[{2014, 12, 31, 0, 0, 0}];
Dynamic[{
date, Dynamic[
GeoGraphics[NightHemisphere[date], GeoRange -> "World"],

TrackedSymbols :> {date}, SynchronousUpdating -> False]
}, TrackedSymbols :> {date}, SynchronousUpdating -> False]

but again very complex to apply in the real case when there are many symbols.


Third question. There is a simpler way to prevent this behavior?




Hello,


Thank you for your email.


I have filed a bug report for the issue of NightHemisphere triggering updates with the development team.



The issue about TrackedSymbols->Automatic is not complete clear from the documentation: if you would like to let the inner Dynamic content inherits the tracked symbols of the enclosing constructs, you can use Refresh:


For example, the following code


Dynamic[{x, Refresh[{x, y}, TrackedSymbols -> Automatic]},
TrackedSymbols -> {x}]


will only update when x is changed.


Setting the tracked symbols correctly is a little tricky -- if the issue with NightHemisphere is causing great difficulty in your code, could you please send us the notebook and maybe the developer might provide some suggestion?


I hope this helps.


Thank you very much for giving us feedback and hopefully this issue would be improved in future release.


Sincerely, Wolfram Technical Support





GeoGraphics[{NightHemisphere@DateObject[{2015, 3, 21}]}] // InputForm


GeoGraphics[Graphics[{}]]





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...