Skip to main content

equation solving - How to get exact roots of this polynomial?


The equation $$ 64x^7 -112x^5 -8x^4 +56x^3 +8x^2 -7x - 1 = 0 $$ has seven solutions $x = 1$, $x = -\dfrac{1}{2}$ and $x = \cos \dfrac{2n\pi}{11}$, where $n$ runs from $1$ to $5$. With NSolve, I tried


NSolve[64 x^7 - 112 x^5 - 8 x^4 + 56 x^3 + 8 x^2 - 7 x - 1 == 0, x, Reals]


and I get


{{x -> -0.959493}, {x -> -0.654861}, {x -> -0.5}, {x -> -0.142315}, \
{x -> 0.415415}, {x -> 0.841254}, {x -> 1.}}

With Solve, I tried


{{x -> -(1/2)}, {x -> 1}, 
{x -> Root[1 + 6 #1 - 12 #1^2 - 32 #1^3 + 16 #1^4 + 32 #1^5 &, 1]},
{x -> Root[1 + 6 #1 - 12 #1^2 - 32 #1^3 + 16 #1^4 + 32 #1^5 &, 2]},
{x -> Root[1 + 6 #1 - 12 #1^2 - 32 #1^3 + 16 #1^4 + 32 #1^5 &, 3]},
{x -> Root[1 + 6 #1 - 12 #1^2 - 32 #1^3 + 16 #1^4 + 32 #1^5 &, 4]},

{x -> Root[1 + 6 #1 - 12 #1^2 - 32 #1^3 + 16 #1^4 + 32 #1^5 &, 5]}}

How to get exact solutions of the given equation?



Answer



Since we ask if the numbers $\;x_n = \cos(\frac{2n\pi}{11})\;$ are the actual roots of the polynomial :


p[x_] := 64 x^7 - 112 x^5 - 8 x^4 + 56 x^3 + 8 x^2 - 7 x - 1

any numerical approach cannot be sufficient and in order to prove the statement we should proceed with a symbolic approach. Nevertheless NSolve may guarantee that all the roots could be represented in terms of values of trigonometrical functions like Sin or Cos for real arguments since we have :


And @@ ( -1 <= x <= 1 /. NSolve[ p[x] == 0, x] )



True

The five of the roots are represented in terms of the Root objects, and only two of them have been rewritten by built-in rewrite rules as rational numbers :


r = List @@ Roots[64 x^7 - 112 x^5 - 8 x^4 + 56 x^3 + 8 x^2 - 7 x - 1 == 0, x][[All, 2]];
r[[5 ;;]]


{ Root[1 + 6 #1 - 12 #1^2 - 32 #1^3 + 16 #1^4 + 32 #1^5 &, 5], -(1/2), 1}


Now we can experss r[[;;5]] in terms of Cos (it is possible as we have shown above), we can do it this way :


ArcCos @ r[[;; 5]] // FullSimplify


{ 10π/11, 8π/11, 6 π/11, 4π/11, 2π/11}

We might also use ArcSin as well. Let`s verify if they are equal :


Table[ Root[1 + 6 #1 - 12 #1^2 - 32 #1^3 + 16 #1^4 + 32 #1^5 &, k] - Cos[2(6 - k)Ï€/11],
{k, 5}] // RootReduce



{0, 0, 0, 0, 0}

Well, indeed these are the roots of the polynomial $p(x)$. One observes that FullSimplify cannot reduce the above Table with the standard built-in rewrite rules unless one uses e.g. Table[ Root[...] - Cos[...], {k,5}]// FullSimplify[#, TransformationFunctions -> RootReduce]&.


Another way which might be helpful in more involved cases would be e.g. mapping PossibleZeroQ, however we have to remember that PossibleZeroQ provides a quick but not always accurate test.


Edit


Since all the roots can be represented as Sin or Cos for real arguments, it would be a good idea to explain what is so specific behind the polynomial p[x]. We can reach a general view working with a transformation pointed out by whuber in the comments.


g[z_] := (p[x] /. x -> (z + 1/z)/2) 2 z^Exponent[p[x], x]
g[z] // Factor



(-1 + z)^2 (1 + z + z^2) (1 + z + z^2 + z^3 + z^4 + z^5 + z^6 + z^7 + z^8 + z^9 + z^10)

All the roots of g[z] are roots of unity :


And @@ RootOfUnityQ[ List @@ Roots[ g[z] == 0, z][[All, 2]] ]


True

moreover all the polynomial factors of g[z] are cyclotomic polynomials, respectively $C^{2}_{1}(z)$, $C_{3}(z)$ and $C_{11}(z)$ (see Cyclotomic), so we have :



Times @@ (Cyclotomic[#, z] & /@ {1, 1, 3, 11}) == g[z] // Factor


True

Following in reverse direction we would generate more polynomials with the roots expressible in terms of $\sin$ or $\cos$ functions on rational multiples of $\pi$.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...