Skip to main content

equation solving - How to get exact roots of this polynomial?


The equation $$ 64x^7 -112x^5 -8x^4 +56x^3 +8x^2 -7x - 1 = 0 $$ has seven solutions $x = 1$, $x = -\dfrac{1}{2}$ and $x = \cos \dfrac{2n\pi}{11}$, where $n$ runs from $1$ to $5$. With NSolve, I tried


NSolve[64 x^7 - 112 x^5 - 8 x^4 + 56 x^3 + 8 x^2 - 7 x - 1 == 0, x, Reals]


and I get


{{x -> -0.959493}, {x -> -0.654861}, {x -> -0.5}, {x -> -0.142315}, \
{x -> 0.415415}, {x -> 0.841254}, {x -> 1.}}

With Solve, I tried


{{x -> -(1/2)}, {x -> 1}, 
{x -> Root[1 + 6 #1 - 12 #1^2 - 32 #1^3 + 16 #1^4 + 32 #1^5 &, 1]},
{x -> Root[1 + 6 #1 - 12 #1^2 - 32 #1^3 + 16 #1^4 + 32 #1^5 &, 2]},
{x -> Root[1 + 6 #1 - 12 #1^2 - 32 #1^3 + 16 #1^4 + 32 #1^5 &, 3]},
{x -> Root[1 + 6 #1 - 12 #1^2 - 32 #1^3 + 16 #1^4 + 32 #1^5 &, 4]},

{x -> Root[1 + 6 #1 - 12 #1^2 - 32 #1^3 + 16 #1^4 + 32 #1^5 &, 5]}}

How to get exact solutions of the given equation?



Answer



Since we ask if the numbers $\;x_n = \cos(\frac{2n\pi}{11})\;$ are the actual roots of the polynomial :


p[x_] := 64 x^7 - 112 x^5 - 8 x^4 + 56 x^3 + 8 x^2 - 7 x - 1

any numerical approach cannot be sufficient and in order to prove the statement we should proceed with a symbolic approach. Nevertheless NSolve may guarantee that all the roots could be represented in terms of values of trigonometrical functions like Sin or Cos for real arguments since we have :


And @@ ( -1 <= x <= 1 /. NSolve[ p[x] == 0, x] )



True

The five of the roots are represented in terms of the Root objects, and only two of them have been rewritten by built-in rewrite rules as rational numbers :


r = List @@ Roots[64 x^7 - 112 x^5 - 8 x^4 + 56 x^3 + 8 x^2 - 7 x - 1 == 0, x][[All, 2]];
r[[5 ;;]]


{ Root[1 + 6 #1 - 12 #1^2 - 32 #1^3 + 16 #1^4 + 32 #1^5 &, 5], -(1/2), 1}


Now we can experss r[[;;5]] in terms of Cos (it is possible as we have shown above), we can do it this way :


ArcCos @ r[[;; 5]] // FullSimplify


{ 10π/11, 8π/11, 6 π/11, 4π/11, 2π/11}

We might also use ArcSin as well. Let`s verify if they are equal :


Table[ Root[1 + 6 #1 - 12 #1^2 - 32 #1^3 + 16 #1^4 + 32 #1^5 &, k] - Cos[2(6 - k)π/11],
{k, 5}] // RootReduce



{0, 0, 0, 0, 0}

Well, indeed these are the roots of the polynomial $p(x)$. One observes that FullSimplify cannot reduce the above Table with the standard built-in rewrite rules unless one uses e.g. Table[ Root[...] - Cos[...], {k,5}]// FullSimplify[#, TransformationFunctions -> RootReduce]&.


Another way which might be helpful in more involved cases would be e.g. mapping PossibleZeroQ, however we have to remember that PossibleZeroQ provides a quick but not always accurate test.


Edit


Since all the roots can be represented as Sin or Cos for real arguments, it would be a good idea to explain what is so specific behind the polynomial p[x]. We can reach a general view working with a transformation pointed out by whuber in the comments.


g[z_] := (p[x] /. x -> (z + 1/z)/2) 2 z^Exponent[p[x], x]
g[z] // Factor



(-1 + z)^2 (1 + z + z^2) (1 + z + z^2 + z^3 + z^4 + z^5 + z^6 + z^7 + z^8 + z^9 + z^10)

All the roots of g[z] are roots of unity :


And @@ RootOfUnityQ[ List @@ Roots[ g[z] == 0, z][[All, 2]] ]


True

moreover all the polynomial factors of g[z] are cyclotomic polynomials, respectively $C^{2}_{1}(z)$, $C_{3}(z)$ and $C_{11}(z)$ (see Cyclotomic), so we have :



Times @@ (Cyclotomic[#, z] & /@ {1, 1, 3, 11}) == g[z] // Factor


True

Following in reverse direction we would generate more polynomials with the roots expressible in terms of $\sin$ or $\cos$ functions on rational multiples of $\pi$.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.