Skip to main content

map - Span a function across several consecutive elements in a list


Suppose that I have a list called list. I would like to span an arbitrary function f across specified consecutive elements in list.


Here is an example. Suppose the following:


list = {10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70};

I would like to obtain the following new lists:


{f[{10, 20, 30, 40}], 50, 60, 70}
{10, f[{20, 30, 40, 50}], 60, 70}
{10, 20, 30, 40, f[{50, 60, 70}]}


Is there a simple (perhaps even built-in) way to accomplish this in Mathematica 8? I have come up with the following function spanMap, but my method seems very complicated and clunky:


spanMap[function_, list_List, begin_Integer, end_Integer] := 
Module[{result},
If[begin == 1,
If[end == Length[list], result = list;];
If[begin < end < Length[list],
result =
Flatten[{function[list[[begin ;; end]]],
list[[(end + 1) ;;]]}];];
];


If[begin > 1,
If[end == Length[list],
result =
Flatten[{list[[1 ;; (begin - 1)]],
function[list[[begin ;; end]]]}];];
If[begin < end < Length[list],
result =
Flatten[{list[[1 ;; (begin - 1)]],
function[list[[begin ;; end]]], list[[(end + 1) ;;]]}];];

];

result
]

where


spanMap[f, list, 1, 4]
spanMap[f, list, 2, 5]
spanMap[f, list, 5, 7]


yield the desired results:


{f[{10, 20, 30, 40}], 50, 60, 70}
{10, f[{20, 30, 40, 50}], 60, 70}
{10, 20, 30, 40, f[{50, 60, 70}]}

albeit in a complicated, clunky way.



Answer



This is a good example where Internal`PartitionRagged (IPR) can be used very effectively. First, observe the following:


list = {10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70};


(* 3 continuous elements in the middle *)
Internal`PartitionRagged[list, {2, 3, 2}]
(* {{10, 20}, {30, 40, 50}, {60, 70}} *)

(* 3 continuous elements from the start *)
Internal`PartitionRagged[list, {0, 3, 4}]
(* {{}, {10, 20, 30}, {40, 50, 60, 70}} *)

(* 3 continuous elements at the end *)
Internal`PartitionRagged[list, {4, 3, 0}]

(* {{10, 20, 30, 40}, {50, 60, 70}, {}} *)

You see that for a "continuous span", you can always partition the list into 3 parts as {initial, continuous span, final} by properly choosing the arguments to IPR. This means that you simply need to MapAt your function f onto the second element of the partitioned list and then flatten it.


The function you want can be written as:


spanMap[f_, list_, {start_, end_}] := MapAt[
f, Internal`PartitionRagged[list, {start - 1, end - start + 1, Length@list - end}], {2}
] ~Flatten~ 1

which is pretty clean and intuitive, IMO. Try it out!


spanMap[f, list, {1, 4}]

spanMap[f, list, {2, 5}]
spanMap[f, list, {5, 7}]

(* {f[{10, 20, 30, 40}], 50, 60, 70}
{10, f[{20, 30, 40, 50}], 60, 70}
{10, 20, 30, 40, f[{50, 60, 70}]} *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...