Skip to main content

function construction - How to find (numerical) value of a derivative at point?


I have the following function:


f[0, 0] = 0
f[x_, y_] := Exp[-(x^2 + y^2)^(-1)]

How do I find its partial derivatives at any given point, including $(0,0)$? This doesn't work (obviously, I guess):


point={0,0}
D[f[x, y], x] /. x -> point[[1]] /. y -> point[[2]]

Answer




In case you have any problems, I recommend using the Derivative operator instead of D, since the latter works on expressions, while the former one can work on pure functions.


{Derivative[1, 0][f][x, y], Derivative[0, 1][f][x, y]} // TraditionalForm

enter image description here


The subtlety here is that one cannot use it to find partial derivatives of f at {0,0}, e.g.


Derivative[0, 1][f][0, 0]


Power::infy: Infinite expression 1/0 encountered. >>
Infinity::indet: Indeterminate expression E^ComplexInfinity encountered. >>

Power::infy: Infinite expression 1/0^2 encountered. >>

Indeterminate

however, you can use Limit instead of Derivative:


Limit[ #, h -> 0] & /@ {( f[0 + h, 0] - f[0, 0] )/ h, ( f[0, 0 + h] - f[0, 0] )/ h}


{0, 0}


In general, it works as we would like:


Limit[ #, h -> 0] & /@ { (f[x + h, y] - f[x, y])/ h, (f[x, y + h] - f[x, y])/ h} ==
{ Derivative[1, 0][f][x, y], Derivative[0, 1][f][x, y] }


True

One can also take advantage of FoldList to follow computing several limits, e.g. :


FoldList[ Limit, (f[x + h, y] - f[x, y])/h, {h -> 0, y -> 0, x -> 0}] // TraditionalForm


enter image description here


We have shown that the partial derivative with respect to x is continuous at {0,0}. We can show much more; namely, that any derivative of any order vanishes at {0,0}. We find here the few first terms of a Taylor series expansion near {0,0} :


Limit[ Limit[ Normal @ Series[ f[x, y], {y, y0, 7}, {x, x0, 7}], x0 -> 0], y0 -> 0]


0

i.e. this function is not analytic at {0,0}, since the Taylor series expansion is identically 0, while the function f itself is not.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.