Skip to main content

function construction - How to find (numerical) value of a derivative at point?


I have the following function:


f[0, 0] = 0
f[x_, y_] := Exp[-(x^2 + y^2)^(-1)]

How do I find its partial derivatives at any given point, including (0,0)? This doesn't work (obviously, I guess):


point={0,0}
D[f[x, y], x] /. x -> point[[1]] /. y -> point[[2]]

Answer




In case you have any problems, I recommend using the Derivative operator instead of D, since the latter works on expressions, while the former one can work on pure functions.


{Derivative[1, 0][f][x, y], Derivative[0, 1][f][x, y]} // TraditionalForm

enter image description here


The subtlety here is that one cannot use it to find partial derivatives of f at {0,0}, e.g.


Derivative[0, 1][f][0, 0]


Power::infy: Infinite expression 1/0 encountered. >>
Infinity::indet: Indeterminate expression E^ComplexInfinity encountered. >>

Power::infy: Infinite expression 1/0^2 encountered. >>

Indeterminate

however, you can use Limit instead of Derivative:


Limit[ #, h -> 0] & /@ {( f[0 + h, 0] - f[0, 0] )/ h, ( f[0, 0 + h] - f[0, 0] )/ h}


{0, 0}


In general, it works as we would like:


Limit[ #, h -> 0] & /@ { (f[x + h, y] - f[x, y])/ h, (f[x, y + h] - f[x, y])/ h} ==
{ Derivative[1, 0][f][x, y], Derivative[0, 1][f][x, y] }


True

One can also take advantage of FoldList to follow computing several limits, e.g. :


FoldList[ Limit, (f[x + h, y] - f[x, y])/h, {h -> 0, y -> 0, x -> 0}] // TraditionalForm


enter image description here


We have shown that the partial derivative with respect to x is continuous at {0,0}. We can show much more; namely, that any derivative of any order vanishes at {0,0}. We find here the few first terms of a Taylor series expansion near {0,0} :


Limit[ Limit[ Normal @ Series[ f[x, y], {y, y0, 7}, {x, x0, 7}], x0 -> 0], y0 -> 0]


0

i.e. this function is not analytic at {0,0}, since the Taylor series expansion is identically 0, while the function f itself is not.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...