Skip to main content

plotting - Creating a diagram



I'm wondering if there's a simple way to create a diagram akin to this:



diagram


Basically, I have two figures, and I want to create a diagram where I have the two figures side by side and an arrow (denoting a morphism) connecting the two.



Answer



Inspiring by an old question I asked, here is a possible way to encode your graph


ClearAll[esF]
esF[setback_: .2,
as_: .1] := {Arrowheads[as],
Arrow[GraphElementData[{"CurvedArc", "Curvature" -> 0.5}][##],
setback]} &;
tor = Magnify[

ParametricPlot3D[{Cos[t] (3 + Cos[u]), Sin[t] (3 + Cos[u]),
Sin[u]}, {t, 0, 2 Pi}, {u, 0, 2 Pi}, Boxed -> False,
Axes -> False], .35];
el = Magnify[Graphics[{Red, Thick, Circle[{0, 0}, {.5, .25}]}], .35];
sq1 = Magnify[
Graphics[{LightBlue, Thick,
Rectangle[{0, 0}, {.015, 0.015}]}], .25];
sq2 = Magnify[
Graphics[{LightRed, Thick, Rectangle[{0, 0}, {.4, .5}]}], .35];
g0 = Graph[{1 -> 2, 2 -> 3, 3 -> 2, 3 -> 4, 4 -> 1, 1 -> 4},

EdgeLabels -> {1 \[DirectedEdge] 2 -> Style["f", FontSize -> 16],
2 \[DirectedEdge] 3 -> Style["ψ", FontSize -> 16],
3 \[DirectedEdge] 2 ->
Style["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(ψ\), \(-1\)]\)",
FontSize -> 16],
3 \[DirectedEdge] 4 ->
Style["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(ψ°f°ϕ\),\
\(-1\)]\)", FontSize -> 16],
4 \[DirectedEdge] 1 ->
Style["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(Ï•\), \(-1\)]\)",

FontSize -> 16],
1 \[DirectedEdge] 4 -> Style["Ï•", FontSize -> 16]},
VertexLabels -> { 1 -> Placed[el, Center],
2 -> Placed[tor, Center], 3 -> Placed[sq1, Center],
4 -> Placed[sq2, Center]}, VertexShape -> 0.1];
Show[SetProperty[g0, EdgeShapeFunction -> esF[]],
Graphics[Text["M", {0, 1}]], Graphics[Text["N", {1, 1}]],
Graphics[Text["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(R\), \(m\)]\)", {0, 0}]],
Graphics[Text["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(R\), \(n\)]\)", {1, 0.1}]]]


Here is the result.


enter image description here


It is not completely satisfacing. First, I dont know how to oblige MA to put the vertices where we think they must be. Second, I dont know how to cope with the negative curvature of the two horizontal arrows. Third, I have not found an other symbol for composition than [Degree]. Fourth, it would be nice eather to have an opaque box in the background of the text and perhaps an offset. To do this place blancks between cotes and letters before or after according to what you need.


You can finetune the position of Rn inside the torus by increasing it a little and moving Rn to the right place. And, finally, you can change the fonts.


Last but not least, such a composition is recurrent. It would be nice to be able to do it easily in MA. Latex + Pstricks is far better to do such graphics.


25//11/16


Finally, I have found the way to have, according to the question the perfect graph


ClearAll[esF]
esF[setback_: .2,
as_: .05] := {Arrowheads[as],

Arrow[GraphElementData[{"CurvedArc", "Curvature" -> 0.5}][##],
setback]} &;
tor = Magnify[
ParametricPlot3D[{Cos[t] (3 + Cos[u]), Sin[t] (3 + Cos[u]),
Sin[u]}, {t, 0, 2 Pi}, {u, 0, 2 Pi}, Boxed -> False,
Axes -> False], .55];
el = Magnify[Graphics[{Red, Thick, Circle[{0, 0}, {.5, .25}]}], .35];
sq1 = Magnify[
Graphics[{LightBlue, Thick,
Rectangle[{0, 0}, {.015, 0.015}]}], .25];

sq2 = Magnify[
Graphics[{LightRed, Thick, Rectangle[{0, 0}, {.4, .5}]}], .35];
g0 = Graph[{1 -> 2, 2 -> 3, 3 -> 2, 3 -> 4, 4 -> 1, 1 -> 4},
VertexCoordinates -> {{0, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 0}, {0, 0}},
EdgeLabels -> {1 \[DirectedEdge] 2 -> Style["f", FontSize -> 16],
2 \[DirectedEdge] 3 ->
Style["ψ", FontSize -> 16, Background -> White],
3 \[DirectedEdge] 2 ->
Style["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(ψ\), \(-1\)]\)",
FontSize -> 16, Background -> White],

3 \[DirectedEdge] 4 ->
Style[
"\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(ψ∘f∘\
Ï•\), \(-1\)]\)", FontSize -> 16],
4 \[DirectedEdge] 1 ->
Style["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(Ï•\), \(-1\)]\)",
FontSize -> 16, Background -> White],
1 \[DirectedEdge] 4 ->
Style["Ï•", FontSize -> 16, Background -> White]},
VertexLabels -> {1 -> Placed[el, Center], 2 -> Placed[tor, Center],

3 -> Placed[sq1, Center], 4 -> Placed[sq2, Center]},
VertexShape -> 0.1];
Show[SetProperty[g0, EdgeShapeFunction -> esF[]],
Graphics[Text["M", {0, 1}]], Graphics[Text["N", {1.015, 1.015}]],
Graphics[Text["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(R\), \(m\)]\)", {0, 0}]],
Graphics[
Text["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(R\), \(n\)]\)", {1.009, 0.009}]]]

Here is the result


enter image description here



Yes one can decide where will be the vertices --- VertexCoordinates --- and the composition character is [EmptyCircle]


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...