Skip to main content

plotting - Creating a diagram



I'm wondering if there's a simple way to create a diagram akin to this:



diagram


Basically, I have two figures, and I want to create a diagram where I have the two figures side by side and an arrow (denoting a morphism) connecting the two.



Answer



Inspiring by an old question I asked, here is a possible way to encode your graph


ClearAll[esF]
esF[setback_: .2,
as_: .1] := {Arrowheads[as],
Arrow[GraphElementData[{"CurvedArc", "Curvature" -> 0.5}][##],
setback]} &;
tor = Magnify[

ParametricPlot3D[{Cos[t] (3 + Cos[u]), Sin[t] (3 + Cos[u]),
Sin[u]}, {t, 0, 2 Pi}, {u, 0, 2 Pi}, Boxed -> False,
Axes -> False], .35];
el = Magnify[Graphics[{Red, Thick, Circle[{0, 0}, {.5, .25}]}], .35];
sq1 = Magnify[
Graphics[{LightBlue, Thick,
Rectangle[{0, 0}, {.015, 0.015}]}], .25];
sq2 = Magnify[
Graphics[{LightRed, Thick, Rectangle[{0, 0}, {.4, .5}]}], .35];
g0 = Graph[{1 -> 2, 2 -> 3, 3 -> 2, 3 -> 4, 4 -> 1, 1 -> 4},

EdgeLabels -> {1 \[DirectedEdge] 2 -> Style["f", FontSize -> 16],
2 \[DirectedEdge] 3 -> Style["ψ", FontSize -> 16],
3 \[DirectedEdge] 2 ->
Style["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(ψ\), \(-1\)]\)",
FontSize -> 16],
3 \[DirectedEdge] 4 ->
Style["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(ψ°f°Ï•\),\
\(-1\)]\)", FontSize -> 16],
4 \[DirectedEdge] 1 ->
Style["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(Ï•\), \(-1\)]\)",

FontSize -> 16],
1 \[DirectedEdge] 4 -> Style["Ï•", FontSize -> 16]},
VertexLabels -> { 1 -> Placed[el, Center],
2 -> Placed[tor, Center], 3 -> Placed[sq1, Center],
4 -> Placed[sq2, Center]}, VertexShape -> 0.1];
Show[SetProperty[g0, EdgeShapeFunction -> esF[]],
Graphics[Text["M", {0, 1}]], Graphics[Text["N", {1, 1}]],
Graphics[Text["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(R\), \(m\)]\)", {0, 0}]],
Graphics[Text["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(R\), \(n\)]\)", {1, 0.1}]]]


Here is the result.


enter image description here


It is not completely satisfacing. First, I dont know how to oblige MA to put the vertices where we think they must be. Second, I dont know how to cope with the negative curvature of the two horizontal arrows. Third, I have not found an other symbol for composition than [Degree]. Fourth, it would be nice eather to have an opaque box in the background of the text and perhaps an offset. To do this place blancks between cotes and letters before or after according to what you need.


You can finetune the position of $R^n$ inside the torus by increasing it a little and moving $ R^n$ to the right place. And, finally, you can change the fonts.


Last but not least, such a composition is recurrent. It would be nice to be able to do it easily in MA. Latex + Pstricks is far better to do such graphics.


25//11/16


Finally, I have found the way to have, according to the question the perfect graph


ClearAll[esF]
esF[setback_: .2,
as_: .05] := {Arrowheads[as],

Arrow[GraphElementData[{"CurvedArc", "Curvature" -> 0.5}][##],
setback]} &;
tor = Magnify[
ParametricPlot3D[{Cos[t] (3 + Cos[u]), Sin[t] (3 + Cos[u]),
Sin[u]}, {t, 0, 2 Pi}, {u, 0, 2 Pi}, Boxed -> False,
Axes -> False], .55];
el = Magnify[Graphics[{Red, Thick, Circle[{0, 0}, {.5, .25}]}], .35];
sq1 = Magnify[
Graphics[{LightBlue, Thick,
Rectangle[{0, 0}, {.015, 0.015}]}], .25];

sq2 = Magnify[
Graphics[{LightRed, Thick, Rectangle[{0, 0}, {.4, .5}]}], .35];
g0 = Graph[{1 -> 2, 2 -> 3, 3 -> 2, 3 -> 4, 4 -> 1, 1 -> 4},
VertexCoordinates -> {{0, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 0}, {0, 0}},
EdgeLabels -> {1 \[DirectedEdge] 2 -> Style["f", FontSize -> 16],
2 \[DirectedEdge] 3 ->
Style["ψ", FontSize -> 16, Background -> White],
3 \[DirectedEdge] 2 ->
Style["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(ψ\), \(-1\)]\)",
FontSize -> 16, Background -> White],

3 \[DirectedEdge] 4 ->
Style[
"\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(ψ∘f∘\
Ï•\), \(-1\)]\)", FontSize -> 16],
4 \[DirectedEdge] 1 ->
Style["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(Ï•\), \(-1\)]\)",
FontSize -> 16, Background -> White],
1 \[DirectedEdge] 4 ->
Style["Ï•", FontSize -> 16, Background -> White]},
VertexLabels -> {1 -> Placed[el, Center], 2 -> Placed[tor, Center],

3 -> Placed[sq1, Center], 4 -> Placed[sq2, Center]},
VertexShape -> 0.1];
Show[SetProperty[g0, EdgeShapeFunction -> esF[]],
Graphics[Text["M", {0, 1}]], Graphics[Text["N", {1.015, 1.015}]],
Graphics[Text["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(R\), \(m\)]\)", {0, 0}]],
Graphics[
Text["\!\(\*SuperscriptBox[\(R\), \(n\)]\)", {1.009, 0.009}]]]

Here is the result


enter image description here



Yes one can decide where will be the vertices --- VertexCoordinates --- and the composition character is [EmptyCircle]


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...