simplifying expressions - Filter out all terms not involving a given variable

Is it possible to filter out all terms in a sum that don't include a certain variable? Or equivalently keep only terms that involve a certain variable.

I would like to use such a function to experiment with the behavior of a sum with respect to a single variable (e.g., maximizing).

For example, if the input is $$(\cos(a)\sin(b)+b+\tan(b)c+a^2c, a)$$ I would like the output to be $$\cos(a)\sin(b)+a^2c.$$

I can't find an easy way to do this using DeleteCases or the like.

EDIT: Given confusion expressed about what I want I've changed the example and clarified the purpose.

Answer

The example you show was not too clear. But I am assuming you have set of expressions, and you want to remove those that contain some symbol in them.

For example, given this set of expressions

ClearAll[a, b, x, y]
terms = {Cos[x] Sin[y],a Exp[y] +5 a,b Sin[x],c + y^2,Sin[x]+ 3 b +Cos[y]};

Mathematica graphics

And the expression that contains, say b in it, is to be removed? In this case, you could first make a list of symbols in each expression, then use Pick to remove those that contain b as follows

doNotWant = b;  (*remove any expression with this symbol in it*)
lst = DeleteDuplicates[Cases[#, _Symbol, Infinity]] & /@ terms
Pick[terms, ! MemberQ[#, doNotWant] & /@ lst]

Mathematica graphics

And if you want to remove expressions with say x in them

doNotWant = x;  (*remove any expression with this symbol in it*)
lst = DeleteDuplicates[Cases[#, _Symbol, Infinity]] & /@ terms
Pick[terms, ! MemberQ[#, doNotWant] & /@ lst]

Mathematica graphics

And if you want to keep expressions with some symbol in it, then change the !MemberQ to MemberQ

keep = b;  (*keep expressions with this symbol in it*)
lst = DeleteDuplicates[Cases[#, _Symbol, Infinity]] & /@ terms

Pick[terms, MemberQ[#, keep] & /@ lst]

Mathematica graphics

Comments

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.

Blog

Search This Blog