Skip to main content

manipulate - Assign Locator points to a specific plot


Result on the left is not what I intended to do: it has two sets of Locator points. Trying to determine why two sets of Locator points are appearing. I only intended to have one set.



Result on the right is what I am trying to do: it has one set of Locator points.


Suspect that I am making some fundamental mistake or misunderstanding something. Could someone point out why the results are different? Also, what is an appropriate way to implement this?


Undesired result: Locator points appear twice Desired result: Locator points appear only once


Below is the code for the result on the left. Switch the comments to produce the result on the right. Note these results are for Version 11.0.1.0 Similar, though not always identical, results are obtained for version 10.


Manipulate[
ptsExtended = Prepend[Append[Sort[ptsAll], {1.5, 1}], {-2, 0}] ;
fpts = Interpolation[ptsExtended, InterpolationOrder -> 1];
dfpts = Derivative[1][fpts];
plotf = Plot[fpts[x], {x, 0, 1}, PlotRange -> {{-0.1, 1.1}, {-0.1, 1.1} },
PlotLabel -> Style["f(x)", Bold, 12]];

plotdf = Plot[dfpts[x], {x, 0, 1}, PlotRange -> {{-0.1, 1.1}, {-2, 4}},
PlotLabel -> Style["df(x)", Bold, 12]];
plotSin = Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 6}];
Grid[{{LocatorPane[ptsAll, plotf]}, {plotdf}}](*locator points appear on both plots*)
(*Grid[{{plotSin},{LocatorPane[ptsAll, plotf]}}]*)(*this works as expected*)
,
(*list of controls*)
{{ptsAll, initPtsAll}, ControlType -> Locator, LocatorAutoCreate -> True}
(*other details*)
, TrackedSymbols :> {ptsAll}

, Initialization :> (
initPtsAll = {{0, 0}, {0.25, 0.25}, {0.5, 0.6}, {0.75, 0.85}, {1,1} };
)
, SynchronousUpdating -> False
]

Finally, this is a simple example of a larger code that I am writing. In the larger code, the Locator points also appear in unexpected (to me) plots.



Answer



So even though I provided a way in the comments to do this with Manipulate, I think this is a case where it's better just to go to DynamicModule. Here's an example of how you could do this:


DynamicModule[{

ptsExtended, fpts, dfpts,
plotf, plotdf, plotSin,
ptsAll,
initPtsAll = {{0, 0}, {0.25, 0.25}, {0.5, 0.6}, {0.75, 0.85}, {1,
1}},
genPlots},
genPlots[] :=
CompoundExpression[
ptsExtended =
Prepend[Append[Sort[ptsAll], {1.5, 1}], {-2, 0}],

fpts =
Interpolation[ptsExtended, InterpolationOrder -> 1],
dfpts =
Derivative[1][fpts],
plotf =
Plot[fpts[x], {x, 0, 1}, PlotRange -> {{-0.1, 1.1}, {-0.1, 1.1}},
PlotLabel -> Style["f(x)", Bold, 12]],
plotdf =
Plot[dfpts[x], {x, 0, 1}, PlotRange -> {{-0.1, 1.1}, {-2, 4}},
PlotLabel -> Style["df(x)", Bold, 12]]

];
ptsAll = initPtsAll;
genPlots[];
Panel[
Panel[
Grid[{
{(*Dynamic[ptsExtended,UpdateInterval\[Rule].05,
TrackedSymbols\[RuleDelayed]{}]*)},
{LocatorPane[Dynamic[ptsAll,
ptsAll = #; genPlots[]; &],

Dynamic@plotf]},
{Dynamic@plotdf}
}],
Background -> White
],
FrameMargins -> 15,
Appearance ->
FrontEndResource["FEExpressions",
"MoreLeftSetterPressedNinePatchAppearance"]
],

Initialization :> (
initPtsAll = {{0, 0}, {0.25, 0.25}, {0.5, 0.6}, {0.75, 0.85}, {1,
1}}
),
SynchronousUpdating -> False
]

I think this will exhibit the behavior you desired.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...