Skip to main content

bugs - Definitions are not distributed to parallel kernels


Bug introduced in 10.0 and fixed in 10.0.2.




I have a small package with utilities, which looks like that:



BeginPackage["Utilities`"];
f::usage = "...";
Begin["`Private`"];
f[x_] := x;
End[];
EndPackage[];
DistributeDefinitions["Utilities`"];

When I load this package and try to use my function f with ParallelEvaluate, everything works as expected:


(* Input *)

ParallelEvaluate[{$KernelID, f[2]}]
(* Output *)
{{1, 2}, {2, 2}}

But I get into trouble when I try to use Utilities package inside another.


BeginPackage["MainPackage`", {"Utilities`"}];
g::usage = "...";
Begin["`Private`"];
g[x_] := ...;
End[];

EndPackage[];

The function g is quite big and complicated and f is called somewhere inside it.


When I call g, everything works fine. But when I try to do something like this:


ParallelEvaluate[{$KernelID, g[2]}]

I get a lot of errors. As I understood, the problem is in function f. It seems to be not defined in the context of the main package for parallel kernels.


I've added Print[Definition[f]]; into the body of g, and when I try to use ParallelEvaluate with g I get this:


Both kernels print Null.


Which means, that f isn't defined inside of g. Do you have any ideas, how I can fix it?





Update 1.


While manual distribution of definitions doesn't work, ParallelNeeds works good. I removed DistributeDefinitions from Utilities package and added ParallelNeeds to MainPackage:


ParallelNeeds["Utilities`"];
BeginPackage["MainPackage`", {"Utilities`"}];
...
EndPackage[];
DistributeDefinitions["MainPackage`"];

This work fine. But in my case Utilities package is stored in another folder. And if I do so in MainPackage:



SetDirectory["Dependencies/"]; (* Directory with Utilities package. *)

ParallelNeeds["Utilities`"];
BeginPackage["MainPackage`", {"Utilities`"}];
...
EndPackage[];
DistributeDefinitions["MainPackage`"];

ResetDirectory[];


The definition is again not distributed. It seems like changing directory "erases" distributed definitions. Can I avoid it somehow without placing Utilities near MainPackage?




Update 2.


I found a solution for the problem on my own. One need to set/reset directories not only for kernel, but also for its subkernels, like this:


SetDirectory["some_dir"];
ParallelEvaluate[SetDirectory["some_dir"]];

Update 3.


It's a bug. The answer of Wolfram support:




I could reproduce this problem on my machine and have now reported it to our developers. I hope this can be fixed in our future releases. We at Wolfram, appreciate your feedback and encourage you to let us know of any other problem you may come across while using Mathematica.




Answer



I believe this may be a bug in version 10 as in version 9.0.1 the definition does get distributed. What happens in version 10 also directly contradicts the documentation. Here's an illustration:


enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...