Skip to main content

bugs - Definitions are not distributed to parallel kernels


Bug introduced in 10.0 and fixed in 10.0.2.




I have a small package with utilities, which looks like that:



BeginPackage["Utilities`"];
f::usage = "...";
Begin["`Private`"];
f[x_] := x;
End[];
EndPackage[];
DistributeDefinitions["Utilities`"];

When I load this package and try to use my function f with ParallelEvaluate, everything works as expected:


(* Input *)

ParallelEvaluate[{$KernelID, f[2]}]
(* Output *)
{{1, 2}, {2, 2}}

But I get into trouble when I try to use Utilities package inside another.


BeginPackage["MainPackage`", {"Utilities`"}];
g::usage = "...";
Begin["`Private`"];
g[x_] := ...;
End[];

EndPackage[];

The function g is quite big and complicated and f is called somewhere inside it.


When I call g, everything works fine. But when I try to do something like this:


ParallelEvaluate[{$KernelID, g[2]}]

I get a lot of errors. As I understood, the problem is in function f. It seems to be not defined in the context of the main package for parallel kernels.


I've added Print[Definition[f]]; into the body of g, and when I try to use ParallelEvaluate with g I get this:


Both kernels print Null.


Which means, that f isn't defined inside of g. Do you have any ideas, how I can fix it?





Update 1.


While manual distribution of definitions doesn't work, ParallelNeeds works good. I removed DistributeDefinitions from Utilities package and added ParallelNeeds to MainPackage:


ParallelNeeds["Utilities`"];
BeginPackage["MainPackage`", {"Utilities`"}];
...
EndPackage[];
DistributeDefinitions["MainPackage`"];

This work fine. But in my case Utilities package is stored in another folder. And if I do so in MainPackage:



SetDirectory["Dependencies/"]; (* Directory with Utilities package. *)

ParallelNeeds["Utilities`"];
BeginPackage["MainPackage`", {"Utilities`"}];
...
EndPackage[];
DistributeDefinitions["MainPackage`"];

ResetDirectory[];


The definition is again not distributed. It seems like changing directory "erases" distributed definitions. Can I avoid it somehow without placing Utilities near MainPackage?




Update 2.


I found a solution for the problem on my own. One need to set/reset directories not only for kernel, but also for its subkernels, like this:


SetDirectory["some_dir"];
ParallelEvaluate[SetDirectory["some_dir"]];

Update 3.


It's a bug. The answer of Wolfram support:




I could reproduce this problem on my machine and have now reported it to our developers. I hope this can be fixed in our future releases. We at Wolfram, appreciate your feedback and encourage you to let us know of any other problem you may come across while using Mathematica.




Answer



I believe this may be a bug in version 10 as in version 9.0.1 the definition does get distributed. What happens in version 10 also directly contradicts the documentation. Here's an illustration:


enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...