Skip to main content

algorithm - Extracting values with multiple keys


I want to extract sorted data from a huge database based upon two (or more) keys in a very timely manner. Here is a reproducible toy example for two keys only:


n = 10^5;
keys = RandomInteger[{1, 100}, n];
vals = RandomReal[{0, 1}, n];

data = Transpose[{keys, vals}];


The fastest "traditional" way I' ve found:


result1 = Sort @ Cases[data, {25 | 73, r_} :> r];

Much much faster is a V10 solution:


assoc = Merge[Association /@ Rule @@@ data, Identity];

(I use Mergeto allow for duplicate keys, and the time cost of getting assoc is not important to me).


result2 = Sort[assoc[25] ~ Join ~ assoc[73]];


result1 == result2


True



Speed comparison:


Do[Sort @ Cases[data, {25 | 73, r_} :> r], {100}]; // AbsoluteTiming // First


2.017115




Do[Sort[assoc[25] ~ Join ~ assoc[73]], {100}]; // AbsoluteTiming // First


0.030002



Certainly one reason to upgrade, but two or more questions remain:


(a) Could this code be improved ?


(b) And, passing to n = 10^6, result1 still works, but result2 runs forever and has to be aborted.



Answer




In response to a), you can write Merge[Rule @@@ data, Identity], which is slightly simpler.


In response to b), there are two different ways to do this nicely. One of which works in 10.0.0, the other will have to wait for 10.0.1.


In 10.0.0 we can use GroupBy to associate each unique key with the set of corresponding values:


grouped = GroupBy[data, First -> Last];

Now do lookups by writing, e.g.:


grouped[25]

or


Catenate @ Lookup[grouped, {25, 73}]


You can also use PositionIndex. Unfortunately 10.0.0 has a slow implementation of PositionIndex as described here. But this is fixed in 10.0.1, takes a fraction of a second to complete on your example for n=6. It's actually faster than the GroupBy code above.


keyindex = PositionIndex[keys];

Now we can easily look up the positions for which the key was 25, and from that get the corresponding values:


Part[vals, keyindex[25]]

To look up both 25 and 73 we just do:


Part[vals, Catenate @ Lookup[keyindex, {25, 73}]]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.