Skip to main content

algorithm - Extracting values with multiple keys


I want to extract sorted data from a huge database based upon two (or more) keys in a very timely manner. Here is a reproducible toy example for two keys only:


n = 10^5;
keys = RandomInteger[{1, 100}, n];
vals = RandomReal[{0, 1}, n];

data = Transpose[{keys, vals}];


The fastest "traditional" way I' ve found:


result1 = Sort @ Cases[data, {25 | 73, r_} :> r];

Much much faster is a V10 solution:


assoc = Merge[Association /@ Rule @@@ data, Identity];

(I use Mergeto allow for duplicate keys, and the time cost of getting assoc is not important to me).


result2 = Sort[assoc[25] ~ Join ~ assoc[73]];


result1 == result2


True



Speed comparison:


Do[Sort @ Cases[data, {25 | 73, r_} :> r], {100}]; // AbsoluteTiming // First


2.017115




Do[Sort[assoc[25] ~ Join ~ assoc[73]], {100}]; // AbsoluteTiming // First


0.030002



Certainly one reason to upgrade, but two or more questions remain:


(a) Could this code be improved ?


(b) And, passing to n = 10^6, result1 still works, but result2 runs forever and has to be aborted.



Answer




In response to a), you can write Merge[Rule @@@ data, Identity], which is slightly simpler.


In response to b), there are two different ways to do this nicely. One of which works in 10.0.0, the other will have to wait for 10.0.1.


In 10.0.0 we can use GroupBy to associate each unique key with the set of corresponding values:


grouped = GroupBy[data, First -> Last];

Now do lookups by writing, e.g.:


grouped[25]

or


Catenate @ Lookup[grouped, {25, 73}]


You can also use PositionIndex. Unfortunately 10.0.0 has a slow implementation of PositionIndex as described here. But this is fixed in 10.0.1, takes a fraction of a second to complete on your example for n=6. It's actually faster than the GroupBy code above.


keyindex = PositionIndex[keys];

Now we can easily look up the positions for which the key was 25, and from that get the corresponding values:


Part[vals, keyindex[25]]

To look up both 25 and 73 we just do:


Part[vals, Catenate @ Lookup[keyindex, {25, 73}]]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...