Skip to main content

graphics - Efficiently filling area with disks located at certain points


Starting from a set of points, I want to fill an area using disks. Each disk's center should be one of the points and the disks should not overlap. I've managed to write a function that, given a list of points, finds the respective radii of the disks:


findRadii[pts_] := Module[{
vars = Unique /@ (("x" <> ToString@#) & /@ Range@Length@pts),
norms = Norm[Subtract[##]] & @@@ Subsets[pts, {2}],
dists, constraints},
dists = Plus @@@ Subsets[vars, {2}];
constraints = Thread[dists <= norms]~Join~Thread[vars > 0];
NArgMax[{Total@vars^2, constraints}, vars]
]


The function just maximises the square of the sum of radii with the constraint that each radius should be positive and the sum of two radii should be smaller than the dsitance between the respective points (I know that this in fact does not maximize the filled area, which maximizing Total[vars^2] would, but I've found the result to look nicer).


Testing the function (and timing it) yields the following:


SeedRandom@1; foo = RandomReal[{0, 10}, {20, 2}];  

Timing[radii = findRadii[foo];]
(* {13.931, Null} *)

Graphics[{MapThread[Circle[#1, #2] &, {foo, radii}], Red, Point[foo]}]


enter image description here


Am I missing a simpler way to calculate the distances? How can the function's performance be increased? Ultimately, I would like to use it with >100 points in reasonable time. Note that I don't need a strict maximum of the covered area, but rather a visually appealing result.



Answer



See if the following will do what you desire. It first estimates the distance as half the distance to the nearest neighbor, and then splits the differences with the closest circles.


pts = RandomReal[{0, 10}, {100, 2}];
nf = Nearest[pts -> Automatic];

dist = EuclideanDistance[#, pts[[Last@nf[#, 2]]]]/2 & /@ pts;
dist = FixedPoint[Function[{dist0},
1/2 (dist0 + Table[Min[EuclideanDistance[pts[[i]], pts[[#]]] - dist0[[#]] & /@

Rest@nf[pts[[i]], Length[pts]]], {i, Length[pts]}])],
dist]; // Timing
(* {2.019525, Null} *)

Graphics[{MapThread[Circle[#1, #2] &, {pts, dist}], Red, Point[pts]}]

Circles


[Note: What might look like an isolated point on the left is actually two points close together.]


Quite a bit faster, but not very fast. Practically, though it is highly unlikely you have to test all points, only some of the nearest neighbors (here 9):


data = EuclideanDistance[#, pts[[Last@nf[#, 2]]]]/2 & /@ pts;

dist = FixedPoint[Function[{dist0},
1/2 (dist0 + Table[Min[EuclideanDistance[pts[[i]], pts[[#]]] - dist0[[#]] & /@
Rest@nf[pts[[i]], 10]], {i, Length[pts]}])],
dist]; // Timing
(* {0.254985, Null} *)

The output is the same in this case. Of course there's no guarantee that the nine nearest neighbors will prevent overlap.


If you want the isolated pairs not to have the same radii, then you can start with


dist = RandomReal[{0.35, 0.7}] EuclideanDistance[#, pts[[Last@nf[#, 2]]]] & /@ pts;


And there will be a chance the radii will be significantly different. The lack of symmetry might be more visually appealing, depending on your intended purpose.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...