Skip to main content

Differentiation inside package




I am trying to put all my functions in a single package and some of them do not work because of differentiation. Suppose I have the following package


BeginPackage["Diff`"] 
Diff[yy_]:=Module[{cc},cc=D[yy,x[1]];cc];
End[]
EndPackage[]

And suppose I do the following


<Diff[x[1]^2]


I expect to get 2x[1], but I get 0, what is going on? Probably I am missing something very simple. And yes I need variables in the form x[1],x[2],..., not x,y,z. Interestingly everything works perfectly fine if I do it without packaging:


Diff[yy_]:=Module[{cc},cc=D[yy,x[1]];cc];
Diff[x[1]^2]

The last operation gives 2x[1].



Answer



If you define Diff in a private context, like


BeginPackage["Diff`"]
Diff::usage = ""
Begin["`Private`"]

Diff[yy_] := Module[{cc}, cc = D[yy, x[1]]; cc];
End[]
EndPackage[]

then you will get


<< Diff`

Diff[x[1]^2]
(* 0 *)


That's because the x referred to in the package is in the Diff`Private` context:


Definition@Diff // InputForm
(* Diff[Diff`Private`yy_] := Module[{Diff`Private`cc},
Diff`Private`cc = D[Diff`Private`yy, Diff`Private`x[1]]; Diff`Private`cc] *)

and so it's not the same x that you are calling Diff with, which is in the Global context:


Context[x]
(* "Global`" *)

To solve this, you can declare the x in your package to be in the Diff` context like so:



BeginPackage["Diff`"]
Diff::usage = ""
x::usage = ""
Begin["`Private`"]
Diff[yy_] := Module[{cc}, cc = D[yy, x[1]]; cc];
End[]
EndPackage[]

Since Diff` is put on the $ContextPath by EndPackage, when you refer to x after loading the package, it is translated to Diff`x, which matches the definition in the package (Make sure you restart the kernel first, if you're following along):


<< Diff`


Diff[x[1]^2]
(* 2 x[1] *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.