Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Variable integration limits over real numbers only



I have a simple question regarding this code:


Maximize[{Integrate[1/(10 - e)
Integrate[((x - 5)/(10 - 5))^(9)*5/x, {x, 5, y}]
, {y, e, 10}], e >= 0, e <= 10}, e]

I get the following error message: "Unable to prove that integration limits {10,e} are real. Adding assumptions may help." I tried some things already mentioned in other questions, but I didn't get it to work. Any tips?



Answer



Adding Assumptions -> y > 0 in the outer-most integral gives



Maximize[{Integrate[1/(10 - e)
Integrate[((x - 5)/(10 - 5))^(9)*5/x, {x, 5, y}]
, {y, e, 10}, Assumptions -> y > 0], 0 <= e <= 10}, e] // Simplify


{1879/504 - Log[32], {e -> 0}}



N @ %



{0.262439, {e -> 0.}}



although with warnings:



Integrate::pwrl: "Unable to prove that integration limits {10,e} are real. Adding assumptions may help.



and



Maximize::wksol: Warning: there is no maximum in the region in which the objective function is defined and the constraints are satisfied; a result on the boundary will be returned.




Let's investigate the procedure step by step:




First, compute the inner integral


f[y_] = Normal[Integrate[(((x - 5)/(10 - 5))^9*5)/x, {x, 5, y}]]

enter image description here


Without Normal, it's a ConditionalExpression with y>0. So, taking it into account in the outer integral:


g[e_] = Integrate[f[y]/
(10 - e), {y, e, 10}, Assumptions -> y > 0 && 0 < e < 10]


enter image description here


where without 0 < e < 10 it is also a ConditionalExpression with this condition.


For visual inspection


Plot[g[e], {e, 0, 10}]

enter image description here


hence the maximum might indeed be at e = 0 (or e = 10), but g[0] yields Indeterminate (g[10] yields ComplexInfinity), so


Limit[g[e], e -> 0]
Limit[g[e], e -> 10]



1879/504 - 5 Log[2]


1879/504 - 5 Log[2]



So the function does not have a local maximum in 0 < e < 10; it reaches its (finite) maximal values only asymptotically at the boundaries of the interval.


So, wrapping it up, this


Maximize[{Integrate[1/(10 - e)
Integrate[((x - 5)/(10 - 5))^(9)*5/x, {x, 5, y}]
, {y, e, 10}, Assumptions -> y > 0 && 0 < e < 10],
0 <= e <= 10}, e] // Simplify


gives the proper answer, with a warning due to the limit. Constraining e to 9 <= e <= 10 in the last expression confirms that at e->0 and e->10 the expression yields the same value.




Additionally,


Minimize[{Integrate[1/(10 - e)
Integrate[((x - 5)/(10 - 5))^(9)*5/x, {x, 5, y}]
, {y, e, 10}, Assumptions -> y > 0 && 0 < e < 10],
0 <= e <= 10}, e] // N



{0.0156124, {e -> 1.76903}}



without warnings (without N the output is a complicated and uninsightful Root expression).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

front end - keyboard shortcut to invoke Insert new matrix

I frequently need to type in some matrices, and the menu command Insert > Table/Matrix > New... allows matrices with lines drawn between columns and rows, which is very helpful. I would like to make a keyboard shortcut for it, but cannot find the relevant frontend token command (4209405) for it. Since the FullForm[] and InputForm[] of matrices with lines drawn between rows and columns is the same as those without lines, it's hard to do this via 3rd party system-wide text expanders (e.g. autohotkey or atext on mac). How does one assign a keyboard shortcut for the menu item Insert > Table/Matrix > New... , preferably using only mathematica? Thanks! Answer In the MenuSetup.tr (for linux located in the $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/X/ directory), I changed the line MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog"] to read MenuItem["&New...", "CreateGridBoxDialog", MenuKey["m", Modifiers-...

How to thread a list

I have data in format data = {{a1, a2}, {b1, b2}, {c1, c2}, {d1, d2}} Tableform: I want to thread it to : tdata = {{{a1, b1}, {a2, b2}}, {{a1, c1}, {a2, c2}}, {{a1, d1}, {a2, d2}}} Tableform: And I would like to do better then pseudofunction[n_] := Transpose[{data2[[1]], data2[[n]]}]; SetAttributes[pseudofunction, Listable]; Range[2, 4] // pseudofunction Here is my benchmark data, where data3 is normal sample of real data. data3 = Drop[ExcelWorkBook[[Column1 ;; Column4]], None, 1]; data2 = {a #, b #, c #, d #} & /@ Range[1, 10^5]; data = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {10^6, 4}]; Here is my benchmark code kptnw[list_] := Transpose[{Table[First@#, {Length@# - 1}], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list kptnw2[list_] := Transpose[{ConstantArray[First@#, Length@# - 1], Rest@#}, {3, 1, 2}] &@list OleksandrR[list_] := Flatten[Outer[List, List@First[list], Rest[list], 1], {{2}, {1, 4}}] paradox2[list_] := Partition[Riffle[list[[1]], #], 2] & /@ Drop[list, 1] RM[list_] := FoldList[Transpose[{First@li...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...