Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - How to make traditional output for derivatives


Hello again after some pause. i have a problem how to present partial derivatives in traditional form, not as Mathematica gave it to me in its notation. So I want to present this


Subscript[S, 1]* (F1^(4,0))[x,y]+Subscript[S, 2]* (F1^(2,2))[x,y]

to have a look $S_1\frac{\partial ^4F_1(x,y)}{\partial x^4}+S_2\frac{\partial ^4F_1(x,y)}{\partial x^2\partial y^2}$


And if I have for example lot of different combination of derivatives terms I want to do this automatically . Is it possible?



Answer



The problem with using TraditionalForm@Defer is that it won't work as soon as the Defer is gone. So you always need an additional wrapper, different from the simple TraditionalForm wrapper, to get the desired output. It can sometimes be desirable to have the derivative formatted automatically for all TraditionalForm environments, e.g., in Graphics labels etc.


If, as you mention in the question, you have numerous combinations of derivatives, then the output quickly becomes cluttered if you keep writing out all the function arguments in a partial derivative. This is why I formatted the derivative without arguments in this answer.


An additional formatting requirement in traditional form would be to write ordinary derivatives with a straight derivative symbol to distinguish them from partial derivatives. This isn't automatically done by Mathematica in TraditionalForm output, so I added that case distinction in the linked answer.



The downside of the shortened notation in that answer was that you can't copy the formatted output and re-use it as input by pasting it back into a new line.


Here is a way to get the advantages of more readable short-hand notation in the displayed output while at the same time maintaining the ability to evaluate the output later:


Derivative /: 
MakeBoxes[Derivative[α__][f1_][vars__?AtomQ],
TraditionalForm] := Module[{bb, dd, sp},
MakeBoxes[dd, _] ^=
If[Length[{α}] == 1, "\[DifferentialD]", "∂"];
MakeBoxes[sp, _] ^= "\[ThinSpace]";
bb /: MakeBoxes[bb[x__], _] := RowBox[Map[ToBoxes[#] &, {x}]];
TemplateBox[{ToBoxes[bb[dd^Plus[α], f1]],

ToBoxes[Apply[bb,
Riffle[Map[
bb[dd, #] &, (Pick[{vars}, #]^Pick[{α}, #] &[
Thread[{α} > 0]])], sp]]],
ToBoxes[Derivative[α][f1][vars]]}, "ShortFraction",
DisplayFunction :> (FractionBox[#1, #2] &),
InterpretationFunction :> (#3 &), Tooltip -> Automatic]]

TraditionalForm[D[f[x], x]]



$\frac{d f}{d x}$



TraditionalForm[D[f[x, y], x, x]]


$\frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial x^2}$



Note the absence of arguments $(x)$ and $(x,y)$, respectively, and the different symbols for partial and ordinary derivatives. Also, you can now copy any of the above outputs and paste them into an Input cell. The result is again recognized as the original derivative, without loss of information.


What I added to the original solution linked above is a TemplateBox that specifies both a DisplayFunction (using the original formatting in the previous answer), and an IntepretationFunction which simply contains the box form of the original derivative expression. The latter is used when you try to evaluate the output. Since the function arguments are kept in that expression, it can be evaluated without problems.



Edit:


Originally I allowed this simplified derivative display only to be applied when al the function variables are symbols, as mentioned in the comments. The reason is that the simplified notation is clumsy when the chain rule needs to be applied. In that case, it's better to identify the function slots as it's done in the built-in display of Derivative.


On the other hand, the restriction to symbolic variables may be too strong if you also want to get the shortened display with functions that have one or more variables set equal to a constant. So I now allow the display to work as long as the arguments are atomic, not necessarily symbols. This makes it possible to get the following (note x = 0):


TraditionalForm[D[f[0, y], y]]


$\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$



The output can still be copied into an input cell to get back the original information: f^(0,1)[0,y].


Here I verify that for compositions of functions, I still get the more verbose display I prefer:



TraditionalForm[D[f[g[x], y], x]]


$f^{(1,0)}(g(x), y)\,\frac{d g}{d x}$



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....