Skip to main content

front end - FormatType with respect to Cell's content


Minimal example:


Let's establish a notebook's stylesheet with additional TestStyle which has a FormatType->"CellExpression":


SetOptions[
EvaluationNotebook[],
StyleDefinitions -> Notebook[{

Cell[StyleData[StyleDefinitions -> "Default.nb"]],
Cell[StyleData["Notebook"], Background -> LightBlue],
Cell[StyleData["TestStyle"], FormatType -> "CellExpression"]
}]
]

and let's create couple of examples:


CellPrint[Cell[BoxData["TestStyle"], "TestStyle"]]

CellPrint[Cell[TextData["TestStyle"], "TestStyle"]]


CellPrint[Cell["TestStyle", "TestStyle"]]

Problem:


The first one doesn't respect FormatType (Background should be White). I can imagine it is to be expected but I failed to explain it to myself.


enter image description here


Question:


What exactly do I have to keep in mind about interference between Cell contents and FormatType or other options. Background inherited from CellExpression shouldn't care about the content so there is probably something more general to remember.



Answer



Cell[TextData["string"]] is completely equivalent to Cell["string"]. There's no reason to expect the two to behave differently. TextData is a required wrapper when the contents are more complex than a string, but when it's a string, it changes nothing. And TextData cells have only a single way of determining the format type...from the FormatType option.



While TextData must rely on the FormatType option for its notion of format type, BoxData relies instead on the FormBox wrapper. You can see evidence of this by evaluating...


Dynamic[CurrentValue[FormatType]]

If you convert the output cell to TraditionalForm, you'll see the dynamic update. But note that nowhere in the underlying cell expression is FormatType->TraditionalForm set. Nor is it set in the "TraditionalForm" style in Core.nb. This is the FE trying to keep the FormBox and option forms of FormatType in sync.


When a BoxData cell has no FormBox, then it's StandardForm. Always. This is hard-coded and cannot be overridden.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?