Skip to main content

equation solving - 4th-order Runge-Kutta method to solve a system of coupled ODEs




I am a beginner at Mathematica programming and with the Runge-Kutta method as well. I'm trying to solve a system of coupled ODEs using a 4th-order Runge-Kutta method for my project work.


I have solved it by NDSolve, but I want to solve this by 4th-order Runge-Kutta method. Here is my problem:


Γ = 1.4    
k = 0
z = 0
β = 0.166667

k1 = (d[η] v[η] η (1 - z d[η]) (v[η] - η) - 2 p[η] η (1 - z d[η]) - ϕ[η]^2 d[η] 
     (1 - z d[η]) - Γ p[η] v[η])/((Γ p[η] - (v[η] - η)^2 d[η] (1 - z d[η])) η)


k2 = (d[η] (1 - z d[η]) (v[η] d[η] (v[η] - 2 η) (v[η] - η) + 2 p[η] η + ϕ[η]^2 
     d[η]))/((Γ p[η] - (v[η] - η)^2 d[η] (1 - z d[η])) (v[η] - η) η)

k3 = (p[η] d[η] (2 η (v[η] - η)^2 (1 - z d[η]) + Γ v[η] (v[η] - 2 η) (v[η] - η) +
     ϕ[η]^2 Γ))/((Γ p[η] - (v[η] - η)^2 d[η] (1 - z d[η])) (v[η] - η) η)

k4 = -((ϕ[η] (v[η] + η))/(η (v[η] - η)))

k5 = -(w[η]/(η (v[η] - η)))


sol = NDSolve[{v'[η] == k1, d'[η] == k2, p'[η] == k3, ϕ'[η] == k4, w'[η] == k5, 
   v[1] == (1 - β), d[1] == 1/β, p [1] == (1 - β), ϕ[1] == 0.01, w[1] == 0.02}, 
  {v, d, p, ϕ, w}, {η, 0, 1}, MaxSteps -> 30000]

Please guide me how can I solve the above problem with 4th-order Runge-Kutta method, thanks.


code for RK4 method are given in Solving a system of ODEs with the Runge-Kutta method


but how can I apply those codes to my problem...please guide me...



Answer



According to your statement, I think what you need is just 4th-order Runge-Kutta method, and a completely self-made implementation of 4th-order Runge-Kutta method isn't necessary, then the answer from J.M. has shown you the optimal direction:


(* Unchanged part omitted. *)


ClassicalRungeKuttaCoefficients[4, prec_] :=With[{amat = {{1/2}, {0, 1/2}, {0, 0, 1}},
   bvec = {1/6, 1/3, 1/3, 1/6}, cvec = {1/2, 1/2, 1}}, N[{amat, bvec, cvec}, prec]]

sol = NDSolve[{v'[η] == k1, d'[η] == k2, p'[η] == k3, ϕ'[η] == k4, w'[η] == k5, 
   v[1] == (1 - β), d[1] == 1/β, p[1] == (1 - β), ϕ[1] == 0.01, w[1] == 0.02}, 
   {v, d, p, ϕ, w}, {η, 0, 1}, 
  Method -> {"ExplicitRungeKutta", "DifferenceOrder" -> 4, 
    "Coefficients" -> ClassicalRungeKuttaCoefficients}, StartingStepSize -> 1/10000]


However, what I really want to point out is, despite the above code seems to solve your ODE set up to η = 0.0001, I'm afraid it's not reliable at all:


 {{nl, nr}} = (v /. sol)[[1]]["Domain"];
 Plot[{v@n, d@n, p@n, ϕ@n, w@n} /. sol // Evaluate, {n, nl, nr}]

enter image description here


NDSolve by default setting doesn't manage to solve this set of equation, too. It stopped at about η = 0.9576. (I'm not sure what do you mean by saying you have solved it by NDSolve.) I'm not surprised though, your ODEs are non-linear. As for how to solve the ODEs, it's another question. I vote to close this question as a duplicate.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more