Skip to main content

string manipulation - Dataset breaks multi-character StringSplit


Given


ds = Dataset[{"a b", "c-d"} ]


multi-character StringSplit is broken with Dataset (10.1 regression?)


ds[All, StringSplit[#, {" ", "-"}] &]

enter image description here


though single split charaters works:


ds[All, StringSplit[#, " "] &] // Normal    


{{"a", "b"}, {"c-d"}}




As does plain non-Dataset version of multi-char of course (same output as above)


ds // Normal // Map[StringSplit[#, {" ", "-"}] &]

Answer



This issue is due to the same type-inferencing problem described here.


Using printSignatures from the referenced answer, we can see that the type inferencer will only accept a single string as the second argument, not a list:


printSignatures[StringSplit]
(*
{Vector[Atom[String], n_]}
{Atom[String]}

{Atom[String], Atom[String]}
{Vector[Atom[String], n_], Atom[String]}
*)

This list of valid signatures will only accept a single string as the second argument.


The referenced answer shows how to dodge the type-inferencer. We can use similar work-arounds here: either by using Query directly on the raw data...


ds // Normal // Query[Dataset, StringSplit[#, {" ", "-"}] &]

dataset screenshot


... or by disguising the StringSplit operator:



ds[All, StringSplit&[][#, {" ", "-"}] &]

dataset screenshot


Notice how the second work-around loses useful type information in this case, causing the dataset visualization to fall back to a cruder form. We can restore the missing type information by inserting a terminal Dataset ascending operator into the query:


ds[Dataset, StringSplit&[][#, {" ", "-"}] &]

dataset screenshot


This last operation causes the proper type information to be deduced from the final output data (using TypeSystem`DeduceType), restoring the proper visualization.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.