Skip to main content

manipulate - Defining a recursive function with additional parameters that can be used in a Manipulated ListPlot


I'm trying to code up some plots for Autocorrelation Functions in Time Series Analysis, which can often be defined recursively. The goal is then to have Manipulate sliders that allow you to dynamically change the controlling parameters. Here's an example of the sort of plots I'm trying to emulate: ACF for several AR(2) models


(here, $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ are the parameters I want to manipulate.)


For this $AR(2)$ model, the ACF, denoted $\rho_k$, can be defined recursively as follows:


$\rho_0 = 1$


$\rho_1 = \frac{\phi_1}{1-\phi_2}$


$\rho_k = \phi_1 \rho_{k-1} + \phi_2 \rho_{k-2}$





How do I implement this recursion and ListPlot in Mathematica?


I've tried doing:


ρ[0,φ1_,φ2_]:= 1
ρ[1,φ1_,φ2_]:= φ1/(1-φ2)
ρ[k,φ1_,φ2_]:= φ1 * ρ[k-1,φ1,φ2] + φ2 * ρ[k-2,φ1,φ2]

But then the ListPlot, even when plotted for e.g. {k, 0, 10}, only shows $ρ[0]$ and $ρ[1]$. I'm still a bit new to coding larger projects in Mathematica (only basic ODE StreamPlots in the past), so I think I'm misunderstanding the proper way to handle defining functions.



Answer



The underlying difference equation for $\text{AR}(2)$ is a three-term recurrence with constant coefficients. RSolve[] can directly solve this, after which you can use the solution along with DiscretePlot[] for visualization.



I will let someone else implement that approach. Instead, let me show how to use LinearRecurrence[] along with ListPlot[]:


Manipulate[ListPlot[Rest[LinearRecurrence[{φ1, φ2}, {1, φ1/(1 - φ2)}, n + 1]],
Filling -> Axis, Frame -> True,
FrameLabel -> {"Lag", "\!\(\*SubscriptBox[\(ρ\), \(k\)]\)"},
PlotRange -> All, PlotStyle -> Black],
{{φ1, 1}, 0, 3}, {{φ2, -1/2}, -1, 1}, {{n, 12}, 2, 20, 1}]

Manipulate for AR(2) process


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...