Skip to main content

export - Simple example of NetGraph running in MXNet?


There is an great example of exporting a NetGraph (that was trained in Mathematica) into the MXNet's format.


However, I think there's a bug or something is wrong with the answer, because once exported the file refuses to load into mxnet.


I've cleaned the old answer (which is broken) into something that works:


<< MXNetLink`;
<< NeuralNetworks`;
<< GeneralUtilities`;
net = NetChain[{ConvolutionLayer[20, {5, 5}], ElementwiseLayer[Ramp], 
   PoolingLayer[{2, 2}, {2, 2}], ConvolutionLayer[50, {5, 5}], 

   ElementwiseLayer[Ramp], PoolingLayer[{2, 2}, {2, 2}], 
   FlattenLayer[], DotPlusLayer[500], ElementwiseLayer[Ramp], 
   DotPlusLayer[10], SoftmaxLayer[]}, 
  "Output" -> NetDecoder[{"Class", Range[0, 9]}], 
  "Input" -> NetEncoder[{"Image", {28, 28}, "Grayscale"}]]
resource = ResourceObject["MNIST"];
trainingData = ResourceData[resource, "TrainingData"];
testData = ResourceData[resource, "TestData"];
trained = 
 NetTrain[net, trainingData, ValidationSet -> testData, 

  MaxTrainingRounds -> 3]
jsonPath = "~/MNIST-symbol.json";
paraPath = "~/MNIST-0000.params";
Export[jsonPath, ToMXJSON[trained][[1]], "String"];
f[str_] := 
  If[StringFreeQ[str, "Arrays"], str, 
   StringReplace[
    StringSplit[str, ".Arrays."] /. {a_, b_} :> 
      StringJoin[{"arg:", a, "_", b}], {"Weights" -> "weight", 
     "Biases" -> "bias"}]];

plan = ToMXPlan[trained];
NDArrayExport[paraPath, 
 NDArrayCreate /@ KeyMap[f, plan["ArgumentArrays"]]]

Now, yes we can load it back into MMA alright, but when it comes time to try it with MXNet for reals, we start hitting various snags when trying to load the symbol/params into a module so we can actually use the network:


import mxnet as mx (* python code that loads an runs the model *)
sym, arg_params, aux_params = mx.model.load_checkpoint('MNIST', 0)
from sklearn.datasets import fetch_mldata
mnist = fetch_mldata('MNIST original')
batch_size = 2

iter = mx.io.NDArrayIter(mnist['data'][:6], mnist['target'][:6], batch_size)
mod = mx.mod.Module(symbol=sym, context=mx.cpu(), data_names=['Input'], label_names=None)
mod.bind(for_training=False, data_shapes = [('Input', (batch_size, 1, 28, 28))])
mod.set_params(arg_params, aux_params)
print(mod.predict(iter))

enter image description here enter image description here


I've heard this functionality is coming in future versions, but I'd really like to start using the nets I've trained in a real setting. Any ideas?



Answer



In my question Example of NetChain running in MXNet cause Error and re-post in Wolfram Community



Thanks for Mike Sollami gave nice code to get the perfect result.


enter image description here


enter image description here


enter image description here


enter image description here


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....
Post a Comment
Read more