Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Finding surface normal for 3D region at a specific point


I would like to find the surface normal for a point on a 3D filled shape in Mathematica.


I know how to calculate the normal of a parametric surface using the cross product but this method will not work for a shape like Cone[] or Ball[].




  1. Is there some sort of RegionNormal option? There is an option to find VertexNormals here, but this is something to with shading and seems unhelpful.

  2. Is there a method I can use to convert the region into a parametric expression and use the normal cross product method?


The plan is to take an arbitrary line and find the angle of intersection between the line and the surface of the shape.



Answer



(* put inequality into u ≤ 0 form, return just u *)

standardize[a_ <= b_] := a - b;
standardize[a_ >= b_] := b - a;
regnormal[reg_, {x_, y_, z_}] := Module[{impl},

   impl = LogicalExpand@ Simplify[RegionMember[reg, {x, y, z}], {x, y, z} ∈ Reals];
   If[Head@impl === Or,
    impl = List @@ impl,
    impl = List@impl];
   impl = Replace[impl, {Verbatim[And][a___] :> {a}, e_ :> {e}}, 1];
   Piecewise[
    Flatten[
     Function[{component},
       Table[{
         D[standardize[component[[i]]], {{x, y, z}}],

         Simplify[
          (And @@ Drop[component, {i}] /. {LessEqual -> Less, GreaterEqual -> Greater}) &&
           (component[[i]] /. {LessEqual -> Equal, GreaterEqual -> Equal}),
          TransformationFunctions -> {Automatic, 
            Reduce[#, {}, Reals] &}]
         }, {i, Length@component}]
       ] /@ impl,
     1],
    Indeterminate]
   ];


Examples:


regnormal[Cone[{{0, 0, 0}, {1, 1, 1}}, 1/2], {x, y, z}]

Mathematica graphics


regnormal[Ball[{1, 2, 3}, 4], {x, y, z}]

Mathematica graphics


regnormal[RegionUnion[Ball[], Cone[{{0, 0, 0}, {1, 1, 1}}, 1/2]], {x, y, z}]


Mathematica graphics


regnormal[Cylinder[{{1, 1, 1}, {2, 3, 1}}], {x, y, z}]

Mathematica graphics


It assumes that the RegionMember expression can be computed (which is not always the case) and that it will be a union (via Or) of intersections (via And). It also assumes that the RegionMember expression includes the boundary. Thus, it is probably not very robust, but it handles the OP's examples.


Also, if this is used in numerical applications, which seems to be the case for the OP, one should worry about the exact conditions in the Piecewise expressions returned. It's unlikely the numerical calculations will be accurate enough to satisfy Equal. So either change the conditions or possible change Internal`$EqualTolerance:


Block[{Internal`$EqualTolerance = Log10[2.^28]}, (* ~single-precision FP equality *)
 
 ]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - How to draw some 2D curves in a 3D plot?

I want to plot several 2D curves ( Sin[x] at y=0 , Cos[x] at y=1 ) in a 3D plot, what function should i use? f[x_, y_] := Piecewise[{{0, y 0}, {Sin[x], y == 0}}] g[x_, y_] := Piecewise[{{0, y 1}, {Cos[x], y == 1}}] Plot3D[{f[x, y], g[x, y]}, {x, 0, 10}, {y, 0, 10}] doesn't work. Any ideas? Answer ParametricPlot3D[{{Sin[u], 0, u}, {Cos[u], 1, u}}, {u, 0, 20}, BoxRatios -> 1, PlotRange -> {{-2, 2}, {-.5, 2}, {0, 20}}] === update - general thoughts === I've seen the comments to this question and a few other approaches to the waterfall (or wire) plot are given in this question: Plotting several functions . Also I cannot not mention one of my favorite Mathematica blogs - Archery with this post on the story of discovery of 1st pulsar and an its infamous graphics - code is given in the post:
Post a Comment
Read more