Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Finding surface normal for 3D region at a specific point


I would like to find the surface normal for a point on a 3D filled shape in Mathematica.


I know how to calculate the normal of a parametric surface using the cross product but this method will not work for a shape like Cone[] or Ball[].




  1. Is there some sort of RegionNormal option? There is an option to find VertexNormals here, but this is something to with shading and seems unhelpful.

  2. Is there a method I can use to convert the region into a parametric expression and use the normal cross product method?


The plan is to take an arbitrary line and find the angle of intersection between the line and the surface of the shape.



Answer



(* put inequality into u ≤ 0 form, return just u *)

standardize[a_ <= b_] := a - b;
standardize[a_ >= b_] := b - a;
regnormal[reg_, {x_, y_, z_}] := Module[{impl},

   impl = LogicalExpand@ Simplify[RegionMember[reg, {x, y, z}], {x, y, z} ∈ Reals];
   If[Head@impl === Or,
    impl = List @@ impl,
    impl = List@impl];
   impl = Replace[impl, {Verbatim[And][a___] :> {a}, e_ :> {e}}, 1];
   Piecewise[
    Flatten[
     Function[{component},
       Table[{
         D[standardize[component[[i]]], {{x, y, z}}],

         Simplify[
          (And @@ Drop[component, {i}] /. {LessEqual -> Less, GreaterEqual -> Greater}) &&
           (component[[i]] /. {LessEqual -> Equal, GreaterEqual -> Equal}),
          TransformationFunctions -> {Automatic, 
            Reduce[#, {}, Reals] &}]
         }, {i, Length@component}]
       ] /@ impl,
     1],
    Indeterminate]
   ];


Examples:


regnormal[Cone[{{0, 0, 0}, {1, 1, 1}}, 1/2], {x, y, z}]

Mathematica graphics


regnormal[Ball[{1, 2, 3}, 4], {x, y, z}]

Mathematica graphics


regnormal[RegionUnion[Ball[], Cone[{{0, 0, 0}, {1, 1, 1}}, 1/2]], {x, y, z}]


Mathematica graphics


regnormal[Cylinder[{{1, 1, 1}, {2, 3, 1}}], {x, y, z}]

Mathematica graphics


It assumes that the RegionMember expression can be computed (which is not always the case) and that it will be a union (via Or) of intersections (via And). It also assumes that the RegionMember expression includes the boundary. Thus, it is probably not very robust, but it handles the OP's examples.


Also, if this is used in numerical applications, which seems to be the case for the OP, one should worry about the exact conditions in the Piecewise expressions returned. It's unlikely the numerical calculations will be accurate enough to satisfy Equal. So either change the conditions or possible change Internal`$EqualTolerance:


Block[{Internal`$EqualTolerance = Log10[2.^28]}, (* ~single-precision FP equality *)
 
 ]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...
Post a Comment
Read more