Skip to main content

Why does args symbol exist in a fresh kernel?


In fresh kernel Mathematica 11.3 (Linux) asking for args (similarly for dims) I obtain


    ??args 



Global`args

As far as I remember similar problem we had in 10.x with the symbol z


See



Seems like Global context is again polluted with args and dims as is confirmed by Names["Global`*"]



Answer



It's a type of otherwise harmless bug that tends to come and go with versions. I would suggest to report it to Wolfram, but also not to worry about it. Notice that the symbols have no associated definitions, which means that they will not interfere with your code.




A potential way in which such a situation can arise is the following. Imagine you put


Sqr[x_] := x^2

in your $UserBaseDirectory/Kernel/init.m file. It will cause not only Sqr to be created in the Global` context, but also x, which is easy to overlook. This is completely harmless though, and will not interfere with any x symbol you might use in your session.



A case that is a bit more realistic, and better shows why these bugs tend to occur regularly, is illustrated e.g. by my MaTeX package. Take a look at the Kernel/init.m file of MaTeX, which does follow the standard package structure. In the simplest case, this file would only contain Get["MaTeX`MaTeX`"]. In this case, I chose to include a few extra checks, as well as unprotect/protect symbols. Notice, however, that only System` context symbols appear in this file. If I as much as mentioned any other symbol, it would be created in Global` because at the time when the context init.m is evaluated, BeginPackage may not have yet been reached or EndPackage[] may have been passed already.


Consider e.g. how we can set Protected and ReadProtected on all symbols of a package called MyPack after EndPackage[]. A simple way is


With[{symbols = Names["MyPack`*"]},
  SetAttributes[symbols, {Protected, ReadProtected}]

]

However, this would create Global`symbols. Therefore in MaTeX I opted for the following, perhaps slightly less clear construct:


SetAttributes[
  Evaluate@Names["MyPack`*"],
  {Protected, ReadProtected}
]

Notice that this second version avoid mentioning any non-System symbols, therefore it will not pollute the Global context.


Subtle points like this are very easy to overlook.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more