Skip to main content

output formatting - TeXForm and large brackets (Biggl[ etc)


Goal


I am trying to export a very long expression like


expr = c1*bracket1[a+b+c2*bracket2[d+e+f...]]+...

to LaTeX using TeXForm.


bracket1[arg_] should end up as \Biggl\{\Biggr\}, bracket2[arg_] as \biggl\biggr] and so on.


What I have


What I have managed so far is defining a format for bracket1 and bracket2 that adds text before and after the argument:



Format[bracket1[arg_]] := Row[{"beginbracket1",arg,"endbracket1"}]
Format[bracket2[arg_]] := Row[{"beginbracket2",arg,"endbracket2"}]

This renders expr (without the ellipsis) as


In[1]  := expr//TeXForm
Out[1] := \text{c1} \text{beginbracket1}a+b+\text{c2} \text{beginbracket2}d+e+f\text{endbracket2}\text{endbracket1}

What I have not / Questions





  1. The above does not work if I include TeXForm in the Format definition. I think I read somewhere that the TeXForm is not distributed to the recursive calls of Format during formatting. The implementation above leads to StandardForm being cluttered by the strings as well. Is there a way to restrict this formatting to TeXForm?




  2. What I could not achieve as well was outputting raw LaTeX commands:


    Format[foo,TeXForm] := "\\foo"

    produces


    In[1]  := foo//TeXForm
    Out[1] := "\text{$\backslash \backslash $foo}"


    and using [\Backslash] instead of \\ only reduces the number of $\backslash$ to one. Is there a way to define raw TeX commands?




Remarks



  • I would like to avoid using \left and \right because of the line breaks which are necessary due to the length of the expressions.

  • I would be content with a solution which allows me use the different sizes of LaTeX brackets (and braces and parentheses) without the raw TeX commands. It would be nice to know whether raw TeX is possible at all though.



Answer



Caveat: Since this uses hidden, undocumented functions, it will probably break at some point in the future. Also, I do not have any knowledge of how these functions work, except guesses from observed behavior. Some information is available via Information.



Under the hood of TexForm is Convert`TeX`ExpressionToTeX, which in turn calls Convert`TeX`BoxesToTeX on the box form returned by MakeBoxes[expr, TraditionalForm]. Convert`TeX`BoxesToTeX has an option "BoxRules" which will rewrite matching parts of the box expression to TeX. You can use this to do what you want, if you make a special box form to represent your "\bigg" stuff. I call it biggBox, although technically it will not be recognized as a box.


Below defines a bigg bracket. Bigg parentheses etc. can be defined as well.


ClearAll[biggbracket];
biggbracket /: MakeBoxes[biggbracket[expr_], StandardForm] :=
RowBox[{"[", MakeBoxes[expr, StandardForm], "]"}];
biggbracket /: MakeBoxes[biggbracket[expr_], TraditionalForm] :=
RowBox[{biggBox["[", MakeBoxes[expr, TraditionalForm], "]"]}];

Here is the rule for rewriting biggBox:


mytexrules = {biggBox[left_String, arg_, right_String] :> 

"\\biggl" <> left <> Convert`TeX`BoxesToTeX[arg] <> "\\biggr" <> right};
TeXForm[1 + x](* initializes System`Convert`TeXFormDump`$GreekWords *)
(* x+1 *)

One of the annoying features of TeXForm is that Convert`TeX`ExpressionToTeX overrides the default "BoxRules" of Convert`TeX`BoxesToTeX by setting it equal to System`Convert`TeXFormDump`$GreekWords, so you have to hook into it to get TeXForm to use mytexrules:


If[! MatchQ[oldGreekWords, _List],
oldGreekWords = System`Convert`TeXFormDump`$GreekWords];

If[MatchQ[oldGreekWords, _List],
System`Convert`TeXFormDump`$GreekWords = Join[mytexrules, oldGreekWords],

"Warning: System`Convert`TeXFormDump`$GreekWords not initialized"
];

1 + biggbracket[(x + y)/2] // TeXForm
(* \biggl[\frac{x+y}{2}\biggr]+1 *)

One can use Convert`TeX`BoxesToTeX and Convert`TeX`ExpressionToTeX directly:


Unprotect[Convert`TeX`BoxesToTeX];
SetOptions[Convert`TeX`BoxesToTeX, "BoxRules" -> mytexrules];
Protect[Convert`TeX`BoxesToTeX];


Convert`TeX`BoxesToTeX[MakeBoxes[1 + biggbracket[(x + y)/2], TraditionalForm]]
(* "\\biggl[\\frac{x+y}{2}\\biggr]+1" *)

If you use Convert`TeX`ExpressionToTeX, you do not have to overwrite System`Convert`TeXFormDump`$GreekWords; instead you can pass mytexrules directly:


System`Convert`TeXFormDump`$GreekWords = oldGreekWords;
Convert`TeX`ExpressionToTeX[1 + biggbracket[(x + y)/2], "BoxRules" -> mytexrules]
(* "\\biggl[\\frac{x+y}{2}\\biggr]+1" *)

Here is what happens if you do not specify "BoxRules" -> mytexrules:



Convert`TeX`ExpressionToTeX[1 + biggbracket[(x + y)/2]]


TeXForm::unspt: TeXForm of biggBox[[,FractionBox[RowBox[{x,+,y}],2],]] is not supported. >>



(* "+1" *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...