Skip to main content

parsing - How to get the longest bracket pairs from a string


In C#, we can use regular expression to do some balancing groups, like we can get


{  aa>, <a>}

from


"xx   aa> yy<a>"

using the regular expression


<((?<)|(?<-gro>>)|[^<>])*(?(gro)(?!))>


We can get the syntax coloring with for instance RegexBuddy:



How to realize this in Mathematica?


I prefer using regular expression to do this, but Mathematica just supports some basic usage in regular expressions, and doesn't support advanced usage such as dynamic regular expression and balancing groups.


PS: Another example: how to get {[ab*[c]d], (b(x99))} from "dd9[ab*[c]d]esiddx(45x(b(x99))"?



Answer



First Case


str = "xx   aa> yy<a>";
StringCases[str,
RegularExpression["(?P<([^<>]|(?P>a))*>)"]

]
(* {" aa>", "<a>"} *)

This works as follows:




Second Case


str2 = "dd9[ab*[c]d]esiddx(45x(b(x99))"
StringCases[str2,
RegularExpression["(?P
(\\[|\\()([^\\[\\]\\(\\)]|(?P>a))*(\\]|\\)))"]
]
(* {"[ab*[c]d]", "(b(x99))"} *)

This works as above. Here, instead of < at the beginning of the (sub)string, we allow for [ or ( with (\\[|\\(). The other modifications are in line with this change.


Note that this regular expression may not be satisfying for cases such as


str3 = "dd9[ab*[c]d)esiddx(45x(b(x99))";

(* The square bracket after d is replaced by a parenthesis. *)

StringCases[str3,
RegularExpression["(?P
(\\[|\\()([^\\[\\]\\(\\)]|(?P>a))*(\\]|\\)))"]
]
(* {"[ab*[c]d)", "(b(x99))"} *)

The first element starts with a [ and ends with ). This can be avoided by adding a pattern and a condition test on this pattern:


StringCases[str3, 
RegularExpression["(?P
((?P\\[)|\\()([^\\[\\]\\(\\)]|(?P>a))*(?(b)\\]|\\)))"]

]
(* {"[c]", "(b(x99))"} *)

The starting [ is referred to as b. The pattern (?(b)\\]|\\)) tells us that if b had a match, then the character to match should be ], or otherwise ).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]