Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - How to get a universal answer using Integrate



The following two codes give conflicting answers, when integrating sin(kπx)sin(2nπx) from 0 to 1, where both k and n are positive integers.


Code 1 assumes that k,n are independent integers:



Integrate[
Sin[k*Pi*x]*Sin[2*n*Pi*x], {x, 0, 1},
Assumptions -> {k ∈ Integers, n ∈ Integers}]

The result given by mathematica is 0.


Code 2 assumes that k=2n and n is integer:


Integrate[
Sin[k*Pi*x]*Sin[2*n*Pi*x], {x, 0, 1},
Assumptions -> {n ∈ Integers,k = 2*n}]


The result is 1/2.


The result of Code 2 should be included in that of Code 1. It seems that Code 1 doesn't manage to give a universal result. Isn't Code 1 supposed to give a universal result? if not, how to get one?



Answer



Mathematica works on the general case, not the specific, when it comes to simplifications. Let try to find what is going on. Mathematica says that


I=∫10sin(kπx)sin(2nπx)dx=12π(sin((k−2n)π)k−2n−sin((k+2n)π)k+2n)


Now, when you said that k,n are integers, then k−2n is also an integer, as well as k+2n. Therefore the above becomes zero. Which agrees with what Mathematica gives. Mathematica will not consider the special case here of what happenes if k=2n, since this is a special case of k.


Now lets look at what happens when you give specific case when k=2n. Then the result above becomes


I=12π(sin((2n−2n)π)2n−2n−sin((2n+2n)π)2n+2n)=12π(sin(mπ)m−sin(4nπ)4n)


Where m=2n−2n. (did not want to put zero, since need to take limit). Then the above becomes


I=12πsin(mπ)m−12πsin(4nπ)4n



Since n is integer, then the second term above is zero. (notice also, here there is special case, what if n=0? Then you'll get 1/2 also for the second term and the whole thing becomes zero, like case 1, But since n=0 is special case, it is not considered). Now the above becomes


I=12πsin(mπ)m


But lim, hence the above becomes \begin{align*} I & =\frac{1}{2\pi}\pi\\ & =\frac{1}{2} \end{align*}


Which is what Mathematica gives.


ClearAll[n,k,x]
Assuming[ Element[k,Integers]&&Element[n,Integers],
Simplify[Integrate[Sin[k Pi x]*Sin[2*n Pi x],{x,0,1}]]]
(*0*)



Assuming[ Element[n, Integers] && k == 2 n,
Simplify[Integrate[Sin[k Pi x]*Sin[2*n Pi x], {x, 0, 1}]]]

Mathematica graphics


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]