Skip to main content

plotting - Eliminating the Parameter: Transform parametric equation to Cartesian equation and draw arrows along parametric growth



Hey guys I really could use some help on this calc 3 problem. I'm stuck on how to write the code for this problem:



  • a) Eliminate the parameter to find a Cartesian equation for a parametric curve.

  • b) Sketch the curve and indicate with an arrow the direction in which the curve is traced as the parameter increases.


Given: $x=1-t^2$, $y=t-2$


{x == 1 - t^2, y == t - 2}

I'm not sure really where to start. Thanks for the help!



Answer




Start by using Eliminate to remove the parametric variable


Eliminate[{x == 1 - t^2, y == t - 2}, t]


-3 - 4 y - y^2 == x



Now you can Solve to get an expression of the form $y(x) = -2 \mp \sqrt{1 - x}$


sol = (y /. Solve[-3 - 4 y - y^2 == x, y])



{-2 - Sqrt[1 - x], -2 + Sqrt[1 - x]}



To sketch you will need to know where it crosses the axis


sol /. x -> 0


{-3, -1}



That is, it crosses at {{0, -3}, {0, -1}, {-3, 0}}. With which slopes?


D[sol, x]



{1/(2 Sqrt[1 - x]), -(1/(2 Sqrt[1 - x]))}

Slopes are {1/2, -1/2, -1/4} respectively.


Now the plot with arrows growing in the same direction as $\hat{y}$, i.e up, to the right for $t < -1$ and to the left for $t > 1$


Plot[
sol,
{x, -9, 2},
PlotStyle -> Black

, Frame -> True
, Prolog -> {Blue,
Arrow[Partition[
Transpose[{1 - t^2, t - 2} /. t -> Range[-5, 5, 0.5]], 2, 1]]}
, Epilog -> {PointSize[Large], Red,
Point[{{0, -3}, {0, -1}, {-3, 0}}]}
]


Mathematica graphics




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?