Skip to main content

evaluation - Generate list of strings from a list of assigned variables


How do I generate a list of strings from a list of assigned variables?


E.g. convert


var1 = 10;
var2 = 11;
var3 = 17;
var4 = 5;

compvar = {var1, var2, var3, var4}; (*all variables assigned*)


into


compvarstr = {"var1", "var2", "var3", "var4"};

Using ToString obviously converts the variables assignments into strings e.g.


compvarstr = ToString[#] & /@ compvar

gives,



 {"10", "11", "17", "5"}


I'm after the unassigned variable names as strings e.g.



 {"var1", "var2", "var3", "var4"};

Apologies if this is a duplicate - I had a bit of a look and nothing seemed to answer it.



Answer



You must introduce some form of holding in you definition of compvar as otherwise, assuming it is defined after var1, var2, etc., there is no information to retrieve:


var1 = 10;
var2 = 11;
var3 = 17;

var4 = 5;

compvar = {var1, var2, var3, var4};

Definition[compvar]


compvar = {10, 11, 17, 5}

You could use Hold but then you would need to ReleaseHold (or similar) every time you used compvar. Instead I suggest you use SetDelayed and then recover the definition using my step function from:




It returns an expression wrapped in HoldForm:


compvar := {var1, var2, var3, var4};

step[compvar] // InputForm


HoldForm[{var1, var2, var3, var4}]

To convert to a list of strings:



Cases[step[compvar], s_Symbol :> SymbolName @ Unevaluated @ s, {2}]


{"var1", "var2", "var3", "var4"}

Or:


StringSplit[ToString @ step[compvar], ("{" | "," | " " | "}") ..]


{"var1", "var2", "var3", "var4"}


The first method will return Symbols (as strings) only while the second will convert other expressions as well.




Incidentally if you do not need to store your Symbols in a List you could use a more direct form:


compHeld = Hold[var1, var2, var3, var4];

List @@ SymbolName /@ Unevaluated /@ compHeld


{"var1", "var2", "var3", "var4"}


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.