Skip to main content

evaluation - Generate list of strings from a list of assigned variables


How do I generate a list of strings from a list of assigned variables?


E.g. convert


var1 = 10;
var2 = 11;
var3 = 17;
var4 = 5;

compvar = {var1, var2, var3, var4}; (*all variables assigned*)


into


compvarstr = {"var1", "var2", "var3", "var4"};

Using ToString obviously converts the variables assignments into strings e.g.


compvarstr = ToString[#] & /@ compvar

gives,



 {"10", "11", "17", "5"}


I'm after the unassigned variable names as strings e.g.



 {"var1", "var2", "var3", "var4"};

Apologies if this is a duplicate - I had a bit of a look and nothing seemed to answer it.



Answer



You must introduce some form of holding in you definition of compvar as otherwise, assuming it is defined after var1, var2, etc., there is no information to retrieve:


var1 = 10;
var2 = 11;
var3 = 17;

var4 = 5;

compvar = {var1, var2, var3, var4};

Definition[compvar]


compvar = {10, 11, 17, 5}

You could use Hold but then you would need to ReleaseHold (or similar) every time you used compvar. Instead I suggest you use SetDelayed and then recover the definition using my step function from:




It returns an expression wrapped in HoldForm:


compvar := {var1, var2, var3, var4};

step[compvar] // InputForm


HoldForm[{var1, var2, var3, var4}]

To convert to a list of strings:



Cases[step[compvar], s_Symbol :> SymbolName @ Unevaluated @ s, {2}]


{"var1", "var2", "var3", "var4"}

Or:


StringSplit[ToString @ step[compvar], ("{" | "," | " " | "}") ..]


{"var1", "var2", "var3", "var4"}


The first method will return Symbols (as strings) only while the second will convert other expressions as well.




Incidentally if you do not need to store your Symbols in a List you could use a more direct form:


compHeld = Hold[var1, var2, var3, var4];

List @@ SymbolName /@ Unevaluated /@ compHeld


{"var1", "var2", "var3", "var4"}


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]