Skip to main content

evaluation - Generate list of strings from a list of assigned variables


How do I generate a list of strings from a list of assigned variables?


E.g. convert


var1 = 10;
var2 = 11;
var3 = 17;
var4 = 5;

compvar = {var1, var2, var3, var4}; (*all variables assigned*)


into


compvarstr = {"var1", "var2", "var3", "var4"};

Using ToString obviously converts the variables assignments into strings e.g.


compvarstr = ToString[#] & /@ compvar

gives,



 {"10", "11", "17", "5"}


I'm after the unassigned variable names as strings e.g.



 {"var1", "var2", "var3", "var4"};

Apologies if this is a duplicate - I had a bit of a look and nothing seemed to answer it.



Answer



You must introduce some form of holding in you definition of compvar as otherwise, assuming it is defined after var1, var2, etc., there is no information to retrieve:


var1 = 10;
var2 = 11;
var3 = 17;

var4 = 5;

compvar = {var1, var2, var3, var4};

Definition[compvar]


compvar = {10, 11, 17, 5}

You could use Hold but then you would need to ReleaseHold (or similar) every time you used compvar. Instead I suggest you use SetDelayed and then recover the definition using my step function from:




It returns an expression wrapped in HoldForm:


compvar := {var1, var2, var3, var4};

step[compvar] // InputForm


HoldForm[{var1, var2, var3, var4}]

To convert to a list of strings:



Cases[step[compvar], s_Symbol :> SymbolName @ Unevaluated @ s, {2}]


{"var1", "var2", "var3", "var4"}

Or:


StringSplit[ToString @ step[compvar], ("{" | "," | " " | "}") ..]


{"var1", "var2", "var3", "var4"}


The first method will return Symbols (as strings) only while the second will convert other expressions as well.




Incidentally if you do not need to store your Symbols in a List you could use a more direct form:


compHeld = Hold[var1, var2, var3, var4];

List @@ SymbolName /@ Unevaluated /@ compHeld


{"var1", "var2", "var3", "var4"}


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...