Skip to main content

plotting - High-quality RegionPlot3D for logical combinations of predicates



Unlike RegionPlot, RegionPlot3D copes poorly with logical combinations of predicates (&&, ||), which should result in sharp edges in the region to be plotted. Instead, these edges are usually drawn rounded and sometimes with severe aliasing artifacts. This has been observed in many posts on this site:



One solution, as noted by Silvia, by halirutan, and most recently by Jens, is to use a ContourPlot3D instead with an appropriate RegionFunction, as this produces much higher-quality results. I think it would be useful to have a general-purpose solution along these lines. That is, we want a single function that can be used as a drop-in replacement for RegionPlot3D and will automatically produce high-quality results by setting up the appropriate instances of ContourPlot3D.


Here is a test example, inspired by this post:


RegionPlot3D[1/4 <= x^2 + y^2 + z^2 <= 1 && (x <= 0 || y >= 0),
 {x, -1, 1}, {y, -1, 1}, {z, -1, 1}]

enter image description here


It should look more like this (created by increasing PlotPoints, and even then the edges are not perfectly sharp):


enter image description here




Answer



This is based on Rahul's ideas, but a different implementation:


contourRegionPlot3D[region_, {x_, x0_, x1_}, {y_, y0_, y1_}, {z_, z0_, z1_}, 
  opts : OptionsPattern[]] := Module[{reg, preds},
  reg = LogicalExpand[region && x0 <= x <= x1 && y0 <= y <= y1 && z0 <= z <= z1];
  preds = Union@Cases[reg, _Greater | _GreaterEqual | _Less | _LessEqual, -1];
  Show @ Table[ContourPlot3D[
     Evaluate[Equal @@ p], {x, x0, x1}, {y, y0, y1}, {z, z0, z1}, 
     RegionFunction -> Function @@ {{x, y, z}, Refine[reg, p] && Refine[! reg, ! p]},
     opts], {p, preds}]]


Examples:


contourRegionPlot3D[
 (x < 0 || y > 0) && 0.5 <= x^2 + y^2 + z^2 <= 0.99,
 {x, -1, 1}, {y, -1, 1}, {z, -1, 1}, Mesh -> None]

enter image description here


contourRegionPlot3D[
 x^2 + y^2 + z^2 <= 2 && x^2 + y^2 <= (z - 1)^2 && Abs@x >= 1/4,
 {x, -1, 1}, {y, -1, 1}, {z, -1, 1}, Mesh -> None]


enter image description here


contourRegionPlot3D[
 x^2 + y^2 + z^2 <= 0.4 || 0.01 <= x^2 + y^2 <= 0.05,
 {x, -1, 1}, {y, -1, 1}, {z, -1, 1}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 50]

enter image description here



Firstly LogicalExpand is used to split up multiple inequalities into a combination of single inequalities, for example to convert 0 < x < 1 into 0 < x && x < 1.


Like Rahul's code, an inequality like x < 1 is converted to the equality x == 1 to define a part of the surface enclosing the region. We do not generally want the entire x == 1 plane though, only that part for which the true/false value of the region function is determined solely by the true/false value of x < 1.



This is done by plotting the surface with a RegionFunction like this:


Refine[reg, p] && Refine[! reg, ! p]

which is equivalant to the predicate "reg is true when p is true, and reg is false when p is false"


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?
Post a Comment
Read more

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...
Post a Comment
Read more