Skip to main content

Manipulate with a variable number of sliders


I have a function that operates on a list of parameters of variable-length $n$. I would like to create a Manipulate[] that has $n$ sliders, one for each list element, each considered a separate parameter. The syntax Manipulate[expr,{u,...},{v,...},...]] does not lend itself to this, as it is geared toward a fixed number of parameters known in advance, and referenced by separate variable names.


I have started exploring preparing a list of arguments to Manipulate[] and then using Apply[], but this seems tricky and complicated.


Anyone come upon this conundrum before?



Answer



The Advanced Dynamic Functionality in Mathematica documentation has the following example that looks like what you need.



DynamicModule[{n = 5, data = Table[RandomReal[], {20}]},
Column[{
Slider[Dynamic[n], {1, 20, 1}],
Dynamic[Grid[Table[With[{i = i},
{Slider[Dynamic[data[[i]]]], Dynamic[data[[i]]]}], {i, n}]
]]}]]

nested sliders


It builds a list of controllers (Slider-s in this particular case) by using the fact that you can assign values to not just symbols but also to members of a list by doing data[[1]] = value. Which is exactly the thing that happens inside Dynamic[data[[i]]], as it is equivalent to:


Dynamic[data[[i]], (data[[i]] = #)&]


telling Mathematica to whenever the actual value of data[[i]] is changed, use the new value (#) to update the expression data[[i]].


Also from the Documentation Center, the last example in Manipulate: Neat Examples may be useful:


Manipulate[
ArrayPlot[
Take[data, h, w]], {{data, RandomInteger[{0, 1}, {10, 20}]},
ControlType -> None}, {{h, 5}, 1, 10, 1}, {{w, 5}, 1, 20, 1},
Dynamic[Panel[
Grid[Outer[Checkbox[Dynamic[data[[#1, #2]]], {0, 1}] &, Range[h],
Range[w]]]]]]


which gives


enter image description here


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.