Skip to main content

expression manipulation - Select certain term containing some patterns and confusing pattern Alternatives in FreeQ



I am considering a function termsContain[func_,list_] which select in an expression func the terms containing the ones in the list. The func in general is a sum of some terms and could also be only one term, for example,


in[1]:= termsContain[a + b + c + a x +b y, {x,y}]
out[1]= a x+b y

in[2]:= termsContain[a + b + c + f[a x +c]+b y, {a x}]
out[2]=f[c + a x]

in[3]:= termsContain[a x , {a x}]
out[3]= a x


in[4]:= termsContain[a + b + c + a x[i] y[j] +b x[l] y[m] , {x[_]y[_]}]
out[4]= a x[i] y[j]+b x[l] y[m]

I came up with this :


termsContain[func_, list_] :=  func /. (Longest[u___?(Not[FreeQ[#, Alternatives @@ list]] &)] + v___) :> (Plus[u]);

This works fine for the first three examples, but not for the last one. For the last one, this gives only zero


out[4]=0

Try another example which is also not as expected:



in[5]:=termsContain[a + b + c + a x[i] y[j] +b x[l] y[m] +c f[x[l] y[m]], {x[_]y[_]}]
out[5]= c f[x[l] y[m]]

I thought it should give a x[i] y[j] +b x[l] y[m] +c f[x[l] y[m]]. How to understand these results? I did some experiments, the problem seems to be the FreeQ combined with Alternatives. The Alternatives seems not to take one argument, that is, Alternatives[x[_] y[_]] does not match x[_] y[_] as I thought. See these examples,


in[6]:=FreeQ[a x[i] y[j] +b x[l] y[m], x[_] y[_]]
out[6]= False
in[7]:=FreeQ[a x[i] y[j] +b x[l] y[m], Alternatives[x[_] y[_]]]
out[7]= True

But the out[2] and the out[3] seem to give the correct answer. Why? I am really confused. And how to modify the code to give the expected answer? Thanks!



Appendix: We can test this, for a special case without using Alternatives


   in[8]:= c a[i] x[j] + d f[a[l] x[m]] + f + l +   d a[l] x[n] /. (Longest[u___?(Not[FreeQ[#, a[i_] x[j_]]] &)] + v___) :> (Plus[u])
out[8]= d f[a[l] x[m]] + c a[i] x[j] + d a[l] x[n]

It works here. So the problem really is in Alternatives. FreeQ combined with Alternatives is really confusing, look at these


in[9]:= FreeQ[a x y, a x ]
out[9]= False
in[10]:= FreeQ[a x y, a x | y ]
out[10]= False
in[11]:= FreeQ[a x y, a x | a y ]

out[11]= True

Modify the in[2] a little


in[12]:= termsContain[a + b + c + f[a x y + c] + b x y, { x }]
out[12]= b x y + f[c + a x y]
in[13]:= termsContain[a + b + c + f[a x y + c] + b x y, { a x }]
out[13]=0
in[14]:= termsContain[a + b + c + f[a x y + c] + b x y, { b y }]
out[14]=0


Edit:


At last, I come to this realization,


termsContain[func_, list_] := func /. (Longest[
u___?(Not[And @@ (Through[(FreeQ[#] & /@ list)[#]])] &)] +
v___) :> (Plus[u]);

which is what I want. But I still would like to know how to understand the Alternatives in FreeQ.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]