Skip to main content

physics - Solving coupled Differential equations with matching condition


I am somewhat new to using Mathematica and was wondering if it can solve the following: (a→h) are constants


aw4[x]=−b+c(d−w[x]−ex),x1≤x≤xgaw4[x]=−b+f(d−w[x]),xg<x≤x2


With the boundary conditions:


w[x1]=d−g+ex1w′[x1]=e[w]=[w′]=[w″


There is also a constraint: \int_{x1}^{x2} \sqrt{1+w'^2} dx=h



I believe this model is analogous to solving beam equations with matched conditions except it is nonlinear: basically a cantilevered beam partially resting on a foundation with a pinning point at the end of the foundation that is allowed to move.


I tried searching the site for using jump conditions, but I didn't have much luck with the answers from the top hits. I was thinking that I could decouple the equations at x_g and include matching conditions based on 2 differential equations: w_1[x], w_2[x]. However, the length constraint doesn't appear to be applicable.


So, I tried the following:


a = 8.06*10^16;
b = 8.99*10^6;
c = 8.99*10^11;
d = 500.;
e = -.268;
f = 10074.4;
g = 10.^(-5);

x1 = 0.;
x2 = 10000.;

NDSolve[{
  a*w''''[x] == -b + c (d - w[x] + e x),
  a*w2''''[x] == -b + f (d - w2[x]),
  w[x1] == d - g + e x1,
  w'[x1] == e,
  w[xg] == w2[xg],
  w'[xg] == w2'[xg],

  w''[xg] == w2''[xg],
  w'''[xg] == w2'''[xg],
  w2[xg] == d + e xg,
  w2''[x2] == 0,
  w2'''[x2] == 0
  },
 {w, w2, xg}, {x, x1, x2}
 ]

I get the error:



NDSolve::ndsv: Cannot find starting value for the variable w''

I think this error is pointing to a missing boundary condition. If I specify xg, I get another error, which I'm not sure how to interpret. I would greatly appreciate any comments on solving these equations. Thanks!




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more