Skip to main content

Stopping Evaluation of Manipulate after it goes through once


I do quite a bit of textual analysis with Mathematica, and am currently making some Manipulate objects to walk people through key terms in the database.


One issue I am running into with Manipulate however is that it continues to evaluate. For example, please consider the following code: (warning, this code does loop FWIW)


testInput = {{"the", 4415}, {"of", 1284}, {"and", 1608}, {"in", 
1384}, {"to", 1353}, {"a", 1205}, {"coal", 815}, {"was",
753}, {"by", 459}, {"were", 449}, {"for", 382}, {"is",
362}, {"with", 324}, {"from", 322}, {"on", 317}, {"that",
311}, {"as", 302}, {"mines", 264}, {"s", 257}, {"mining",
257}, {"it", 253}, {"this", 244}, {"at", 244}, {"be",

225}, {"cape", 216}};

testInput2 = {{"the", 4415}, {"of", 1284}, {"and", 1608}, {"in",
1384}, {"to", 1353}, {"a", 1205}, {"coal", 815}, {"was",
753}, {"by", 459}, {"were", 449}, {"for", 382}, {"is",
362}, {"with", 324}, {"from", 322}, {"on", 317}, {"that",
311}, {"as", 302}, {"mines", 264}, {"s", 257}, {"mining",
257}, {"it", 253}, {"this", 244}, {"at", 244}, {"be",
225}, {"cape", 216}};


files = {testInput, testInput2};

Manipulate[
viewerCount1 = {};
Do[
input = access;
AppendTo[viewerCount1,
If[Length[Flatten[Cases[input, {word1, _}]]] == 0, 0,
Flatten[Cases[input, {word1, _}]][[2]]]];
, {access, files}];

Print[viewerCount1];
, {{word1, "the", "First Word:"}}]

It goes through, runs the Do loop which picks out the word frequencies of `word1' in the sample text provided.


But then, it continues to loop. It goes back through and does it again. And again. And again. This is all without any change to the Manipulate input.


Is there a way to get to the end of the line Print[viewerCount1] and then stop until the input changes?


I have tried to figure out the behaviour by looking elsewhere, such as "Manipulate Evaluation Sequence" and in the documentation, but there seems to be a paucity of textual examples like this.



Answer



Here's a minimal example also showing that effect:


Manipulate[v=0; v++; Print[v], {i, 1}]


The problem is that Manipulate by default does not only track i, but also v. So when v is changed inside the Manipulate, it triggers a re-evaluation. Since the re-evaluation again modifies v, it triggers another re-evaluation, and so on.


There are two possible ways out. The first is:


Manipulate[Module[{v=0}, v++; Print[v]], {i, 1}]

That way, v is localized and not tracked by Manipulate. This is probably the best solution for your case, because after all you don't want any other code outside your Manipulate to interfere with that calculation.


The second is:


Manipulate[v=0; v++; Print[v], {i, 1}, TrackedSymbols :> {i}]

Here, you explicitly tell Manipulate to only track i, not v.



In your original code, it's the AppendTo which triggers the re-evaluation.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.