Skip to main content

Stopping Evaluation of Manipulate after it goes through once


I do quite a bit of textual analysis with Mathematica, and am currently making some Manipulate objects to walk people through key terms in the database.


One issue I am running into with Manipulate however is that it continues to evaluate. For example, please consider the following code: (warning, this code does loop FWIW)


testInput = {{"the", 4415}, {"of", 1284}, {"and", 1608}, {"in", 
1384}, {"to", 1353}, {"a", 1205}, {"coal", 815}, {"was",
753}, {"by", 459}, {"were", 449}, {"for", 382}, {"is",
362}, {"with", 324}, {"from", 322}, {"on", 317}, {"that",
311}, {"as", 302}, {"mines", 264}, {"s", 257}, {"mining",
257}, {"it", 253}, {"this", 244}, {"at", 244}, {"be",

225}, {"cape", 216}};

testInput2 = {{"the", 4415}, {"of", 1284}, {"and", 1608}, {"in",
1384}, {"to", 1353}, {"a", 1205}, {"coal", 815}, {"was",
753}, {"by", 459}, {"were", 449}, {"for", 382}, {"is",
362}, {"with", 324}, {"from", 322}, {"on", 317}, {"that",
311}, {"as", 302}, {"mines", 264}, {"s", 257}, {"mining",
257}, {"it", 253}, {"this", 244}, {"at", 244}, {"be",
225}, {"cape", 216}};


files = {testInput, testInput2};

Manipulate[
viewerCount1 = {};
Do[
input = access;
AppendTo[viewerCount1,
If[Length[Flatten[Cases[input, {word1, _}]]] == 0, 0,
Flatten[Cases[input, {word1, _}]][[2]]]];
, {access, files}];

Print[viewerCount1];
, {{word1, "the", "First Word:"}}]

It goes through, runs the Do loop which picks out the word frequencies of `word1' in the sample text provided.


But then, it continues to loop. It goes back through and does it again. And again. And again. This is all without any change to the Manipulate input.


Is there a way to get to the end of the line Print[viewerCount1] and then stop until the input changes?


I have tried to figure out the behaviour by looking elsewhere, such as "Manipulate Evaluation Sequence" and in the documentation, but there seems to be a paucity of textual examples like this.



Answer



Here's a minimal example also showing that effect:


Manipulate[v=0; v++; Print[v], {i, 1}]


The problem is that Manipulate by default does not only track i, but also v. So when v is changed inside the Manipulate, it triggers a re-evaluation. Since the re-evaluation again modifies v, it triggers another re-evaluation, and so on.


There are two possible ways out. The first is:


Manipulate[Module[{v=0}, v++; Print[v]], {i, 1}]

That way, v is localized and not tracked by Manipulate. This is probably the best solution for your case, because after all you don't want any other code outside your Manipulate to interfere with that calculation.


The second is:


Manipulate[v=0; v++; Print[v], {i, 1}, TrackedSymbols :> {i}]

Here, you explicitly tell Manipulate to only track i, not v.



In your original code, it's the AppendTo which triggers the re-evaluation.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...