Skip to main content

Stopping Evaluation of Manipulate after it goes through once


I do quite a bit of textual analysis with Mathematica, and am currently making some Manipulate objects to walk people through key terms in the database.


One issue I am running into with Manipulate however is that it continues to evaluate. For example, please consider the following code: (warning, this code does loop FWIW)


testInput = {{"the", 4415}, {"of", 1284}, {"and", 1608}, {"in", 
1384}, {"to", 1353}, {"a", 1205}, {"coal", 815}, {"was",
753}, {"by", 459}, {"were", 449}, {"for", 382}, {"is",
362}, {"with", 324}, {"from", 322}, {"on", 317}, {"that",
311}, {"as", 302}, {"mines", 264}, {"s", 257}, {"mining",
257}, {"it", 253}, {"this", 244}, {"at", 244}, {"be",

225}, {"cape", 216}};

testInput2 = {{"the", 4415}, {"of", 1284}, {"and", 1608}, {"in",
1384}, {"to", 1353}, {"a", 1205}, {"coal", 815}, {"was",
753}, {"by", 459}, {"were", 449}, {"for", 382}, {"is",
362}, {"with", 324}, {"from", 322}, {"on", 317}, {"that",
311}, {"as", 302}, {"mines", 264}, {"s", 257}, {"mining",
257}, {"it", 253}, {"this", 244}, {"at", 244}, {"be",
225}, {"cape", 216}};


files = {testInput, testInput2};

Manipulate[
viewerCount1 = {};
Do[
input = access;
AppendTo[viewerCount1,
If[Length[Flatten[Cases[input, {word1, _}]]] == 0, 0,
Flatten[Cases[input, {word1, _}]][[2]]]];
, {access, files}];

Print[viewerCount1];
, {{word1, "the", "First Word:"}}]

It goes through, runs the Do loop which picks out the word frequencies of `word1' in the sample text provided.


But then, it continues to loop. It goes back through and does it again. And again. And again. This is all without any change to the Manipulate input.


Is there a way to get to the end of the line Print[viewerCount1] and then stop until the input changes?


I have tried to figure out the behaviour by looking elsewhere, such as "Manipulate Evaluation Sequence" and in the documentation, but there seems to be a paucity of textual examples like this.



Answer



Here's a minimal example also showing that effect:


Manipulate[v=0; v++; Print[v], {i, 1}]


The problem is that Manipulate by default does not only track i, but also v. So when v is changed inside the Manipulate, it triggers a re-evaluation. Since the re-evaluation again modifies v, it triggers another re-evaluation, and so on.


There are two possible ways out. The first is:


Manipulate[Module[{v=0}, v++; Print[v]], {i, 1}]

That way, v is localized and not tracked by Manipulate. This is probably the best solution for your case, because after all you don't want any other code outside your Manipulate to interfere with that calculation.


The second is:


Manipulate[v=0; v++; Print[v], {i, 1}, TrackedSymbols :> {i}]

Here, you explicitly tell Manipulate to only track i, not v.



In your original code, it's the AppendTo which triggers the re-evaluation.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...