Skip to main content

plotting - More on combining 2d and 3d plots


This is a spin off/follow up to Can 2D and 3D plots be combined so that the 2D plot is the bottom surface of the 3D plot boundary? ...


Following Sjoerd's method, I did this:


image = Plot[x^2, {x, -2, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Thick, Black}]; 
Show[Graphics3D[{EdgeForm[], Texture[image], 
Polygon[{{-1, -1, -1}, {1, -1, -1}, {1, 1, -1}, {-1, 1, -1}}, 
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}}]}, 

Lighting -> "Neutral", BoxRatios -> {1, 1, .1}], Boxed -> True]

Mathematica graphics


Two questions:


(1) When I click on the cell bracket and save as... PDF, the resulting graphic is either empty or only contains a snippet of the intended graphic.


(2) I would like to have Mathematica draw the solid which has the region bounded by the parabola and the x axis as its base, but with cross-sections (perpendicular to the base) to be squares. I am not sure how to go about this using Graphics3D.


Any ideas?


Edit: RegionPlot3D indeed allows me to answer (2) very quickly:


p1 = Plot[x^2, {x, -2, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Thick, Black}];
p2 = RegionPlot3D[-Sqrt[y] <= x <= Sqrt[y] && 

 0 <= z <= 2 Sqrt[y], {x, -2, 2}, {y, 0, 4}, {z, 0, 4}, 
 Mesh -> False, PlotPoints -> 100, PlotStyle -> Opacity[.3], 
 Boxed -> False, Axes -> False]
p3 = Show[
 Graphics3D[{EdgeForm[], Texture[p1], 
 Polygon[{{-1, -1, -1}, {1, -1, -1}, {1, 1, -1}, {-1, 1, -1}}, 
 VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}}]}, 
 Lighting -> "Neutral", BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1}], Boxed -> True]

Now my only issue is how to lay the solid in p2 over the image in p3? I tried



Show[p2, p3, PlotRange -> All]

and other variations, to no avail.


Edit #2: Should have had RegionPlot z range as {z,0,4}. Fixed now. Also, the slices can be visualized via


slices = Table[RegionPlot3D[-Sqrt[y] <= x <= Sqrt[y] && 0 <= z <= 2 Sqrt[y] && 
 j - .5 <= y <= j, {x, -2, 2}, {y, 0, 4}, {z, 0, 4}, 
 Mesh -> False, PlotPoints -> 100, PlotStyle -> Opacity[.3], 
 Boxed -> False, Axes -> False], {j, .5, 4, .5}];
Show[Table[slices[[j]], {j, 1, 8}]]




Answer



I'm guessing you want something like this:


p1 = Plot[x^2, {x, -2, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Thick, Black}];
p2 = RegionPlot3D[-Sqrt[y] <= x <= Sqrt[y] && 
    0 <= z <= 2 Sqrt[y], {x, -2, 2}, {y, 0, 4}, {z, 0, 2}, 
   Mesh -> False, PlotPoints -> 100, PlotStyle -> Opacity[.3], 
   Boxed -> False, Axes -> False];
p3 = Graphics3D[{EdgeForm[], Texture[p1], 
    Polygon[{{-2, 0, -1}, {2, 0, -1}, {2, 4, -1}, {-2, 4, -1}}, 

     VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}}]}];

Graphics3D[{p2[[1]], p3[[1]]}, Lighting -> "Neutral", 
 BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1}, Boxed -> True]

solid


Here I modified your p3 to make the polygon bigger so its boundaries are described by {{-2, 0, -1}, {2, 0, -1}, {2, 4, -1}, {-2, 4, -1}}. The texture on the polygon is of course not perfectly aligned with the 3D RegionPlot because the 2D plot contains additional margins for the axes and labels. But I'm using what you provided in the question.


Finally, the main point is that in order to combine the two Graphics3D objects p2 and p3, I used the fact that the actual 3D graphics objects are always stored as the first element of the Graphics3D, so one can extract them by doing p2[[1]] and p3[[1]]. The results can then be re-packaged into a new Graphics3D as I do on the last line, adding the lighting and frame options that you chose for p3 in your example.


Note


If you do this kind of combination more frequently, you may also want to look into the closely related answer I posted under “Covering up” text in Graphics where I define a function label3D which can be used to place arbitrary 2D objects into a 3D scene, including transparency effects.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more