Skip to main content

plotting - More on combining 2d and 3d plots


This is a spin off/follow up to Can 2D and 3D plots be combined so that the 2D plot is the bottom surface of the 3D plot boundary? ...


Following Sjoerd's method, I did this:


image = Plot[x^2, {x, -2, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Thick, Black}]; 
Show[Graphics3D[{EdgeForm[], Texture[image],
Polygon[{{-1, -1, -1}, {1, -1, -1}, {1, 1, -1}, {-1, 1, -1}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}}]},

Lighting -> "Neutral", BoxRatios -> {1, 1, .1}], Boxed -> True]

Mathematica graphics


Two questions:


(1) When I click on the cell bracket and save as... PDF, the resulting graphic is either empty or only contains a snippet of the intended graphic.


(2) I would like to have Mathematica draw the solid which has the region bounded by the parabola and the x axis as its base, but with cross-sections (perpendicular to the base) to be squares. I am not sure how to go about this using Graphics3D.


Any ideas?


Edit: RegionPlot3D indeed allows me to answer (2) very quickly:


p1 = Plot[x^2, {x, -2, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Thick, Black}];
p2 = RegionPlot3D[-Sqrt[y] <= x <= Sqrt[y] &&

0 <= z <= 2 Sqrt[y], {x, -2, 2}, {y, 0, 4}, {z, 0, 4},
Mesh -> False, PlotPoints -> 100, PlotStyle -> Opacity[.3],
Boxed -> False, Axes -> False]
p3 = Show[
Graphics3D[{EdgeForm[], Texture[p1],
Polygon[{{-1, -1, -1}, {1, -1, -1}, {1, 1, -1}, {-1, 1, -1}},
VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}}]},
Lighting -> "Neutral", BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1}], Boxed -> True]

Now my only issue is how to lay the solid in p2 over the image in p3? I tried



Show[p2, p3, PlotRange -> All]

and other variations, to no avail.


Edit #2: Should have had RegionPlot z range as {z,0,4}. Fixed now. Also, the slices can be visualized via


slices = Table[RegionPlot3D[-Sqrt[y] <= x <= Sqrt[y] && 0 <= z <= 2 Sqrt[y] && 
j - .5 <= y <= j, {x, -2, 2}, {y, 0, 4}, {z, 0, 4},
Mesh -> False, PlotPoints -> 100, PlotStyle -> Opacity[.3],
Boxed -> False, Axes -> False], {j, .5, 4, .5}];
Show[Table[slices[[j]], {j, 1, 8}]]




Answer



I'm guessing you want something like this:


p1 = Plot[x^2, {x, -2, 2}, PlotStyle -> {Thick, Black}];
p2 = RegionPlot3D[-Sqrt[y] <= x <= Sqrt[y] &&
0 <= z <= 2 Sqrt[y], {x, -2, 2}, {y, 0, 4}, {z, 0, 2},
Mesh -> False, PlotPoints -> 100, PlotStyle -> Opacity[.3],
Boxed -> False, Axes -> False];
p3 = Graphics3D[{EdgeForm[], Texture[p1],
Polygon[{{-2, 0, -1}, {2, 0, -1}, {2, 4, -1}, {-2, 4, -1}},

VertexTextureCoordinates -> {{0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {0, 1}}]}];

Graphics3D[{p2[[1]], p3[[1]]}, Lighting -> "Neutral",
BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1}, Boxed -> True]

solid


Here I modified your p3 to make the polygon bigger so its boundaries are described by {{-2, 0, -1}, {2, 0, -1}, {2, 4, -1}, {-2, 4, -1}}. The texture on the polygon is of course not perfectly aligned with the 3D RegionPlot because the 2D plot contains additional margins for the axes and labels. But I'm using what you provided in the question.


Finally, the main point is that in order to combine the two Graphics3D objects p2 and p3, I used the fact that the actual 3D graphics objects are always stored as the first element of the Graphics3D, so one can extract them by doing p2[[1]] and p3[[1]]. The results can then be re-packaged into a new Graphics3D as I do on the last line, adding the lighting and frame options that you chose for p3 in your example.


Note


If you do this kind of combination more frequently, you may also want to look into the closely related answer I posted under “Covering up” text in Graphics where I define a function label3D which can be used to place arbitrary 2D objects into a 3D scene, including transparency effects.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...