Skip to main content

parallelization - Passing Package Dependencies to Subkernels


Say I have a function f[x_,...]:=... in a *.wl-Package form that depends on a bunch of Packages (some other *.wl files), and say I want to call this function f several times in parallel. I am currently using a set-up of the following form


LaunchKernels[2];
ParallelNeeds["Privatef`",".../f_file.wl"];


ParallelTable[
output[i]=f[i];
,{i,1,10}];

where i is just supposed to represent a set of parameters. The function f itself is of the form


BeginPackage["Privatef`"]

f

Begin["fenv`"]

Needs["other Packages"]

some code

End[]

EndPackage[]

Now, my problem is that the function f is distributed into the different subkernels I generated, though, the other Packages don't seem to load in each subkernel. I have tried to also use ParallelNeeds on these additional Packages, but without success. So how do I get Mathematica to load each additional Package that f requires in each subkernel that was launched?



Answer




Are the packages you need in the $Path?


If not, the following may be the simplest solution:




  • Create a package file (.m or .wl) which simply modifies the $Path.


    BeginPackage["PathLoader`"]
    $Path = Join[$Path, {"/path/one", "/path/two"}];
    EndPackage[]

    The only purpose of the BeginPackage/EndPackage here is to ensure that (Parallel)Needs won't complain about "context not created".





  • Put this in a standard location, e.g. $UserBaseDirectory/Applications/PathLoader.m.




  • Start your session with


    Needs["PathLoader`"]
    ParallelNeeds["PathLoader`"]



Now $Path will contain all your directories both on the main kernel and on the subkernels.


I use similar (but more complicated) workarounds for Kernel/init.m not being loaded on any subkernels.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.