Skip to main content

scoping - A smarter nested With?



I often find myself writing code that looks a bit like this:


f[x_Integer] := 
With[
{
range = Range[2] + x
},
With[
{
a = range[[1]],
b = range[[2]],

c = g[range]
},
h[a,b,c]
]
];

It would be nice if I could avoid Withs and just write


f[x_Integer] := 
Let[
range = Range[2] + x,

{a,b} = range,
c = g[range]
,
h[a,b,c]
];

which would then automatically expand to the above at definition time.


What I'm asking is a bit similar to this question. There are additional requirements however. The new scoping construct (Let in the above) should:



  • Group sequential disjoint assignments into single Withs.


  • Thread over List assignments.


Of course, it should not evaluate the left-hand-sides and the right-hand-sides of the assignments while expanding to Withs.


Any proposals for such a scoping construct? (I'll post my version soon).



Answer



With this helper function:


SetAttributes[partThread, HoldAll];
partThread[l___, rhs_] :=
Join @@ Replace[
MapIndexed[Append[#, First@#2] &, Thread[Hold[{l}]]],

Hold[s_, i_] :> Hold[s = rhs[[i]]],
{1}];

The following modification of LetL seems to work according to your specs:


ClearAll[Let, let];
SetAttributes[{Let, let}, HoldAll];

Let /: Verbatim[SetDelayed][lhs_, rhs : HoldPattern[Let[__, _]]] :=
Block[{With}, Attributes[With] = {HoldAll};
lhs := Evaluate[rhs /. HoldPattern[With[{}, b_]] :> b]

];

Let[args___, body_] := let[{args}, body, {}, {}];

let[{}, body_, {}, _] := With[{}, body];

let[{Set[{s___}, rhs_], rest___}, body_, dec_, syms_] :=
Module[{temp},
partThread[s, temp] /. Hold[d___] :>
let[{temp = rhs, d, rest}, body, dec, syms]

];

let[
{Set[sym_, rhs_], rest___},
body_,
{decs___},
{syms___}
] /; FreeQ[Unevaluated[rhs], Alternatives[syms]] :=
let[{rest}, body, {decs, sym = rhs}, {syms, HoldPattern[sym]}];


let[{args___}, body_, {decs__}, _] :=
Block[{With},
Attributes[With] = {HoldAll};
With[{decs},Evaluate[let[{args}, body, {}, {}]]]
];

This works quite similarly to LetL. What it does in addition to LetL is that it collects previous declarations into auxiliary lists stored as extra arguments of let, so that it can group together disjoint declarations. It also threads over arguments, using the partThread helper function. In all other respects it is the same code as LetL.


Here is your example:


f[x_Integer] := 
Let[range = Range[2] + x, {a, b} = range, c = g[range], h[a, b, c]];


we can check what was generated:


?f

Global`f


  f[x_Integer]:=
With[{range=Range[2]+x},
With[{a=range[[1]],b=range[[2]],c=g[range]},h[a,b,c]]]


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...