Skip to main content

scoping - A smarter nested With?



I often find myself writing code that looks a bit like this:


f[x_Integer] := 
With[
{
range = Range[2] + x
},
With[
{
a = range[[1]],
b = range[[2]],

c = g[range]
},
h[a,b,c]
]
];

It would be nice if I could avoid Withs and just write


f[x_Integer] := 
Let[
range = Range[2] + x,

{a,b} = range,
c = g[range]
,
h[a,b,c]
];

which would then automatically expand to the above at definition time.


What I'm asking is a bit similar to this question. There are additional requirements however. The new scoping construct (Let in the above) should:



  • Group sequential disjoint assignments into single Withs.


  • Thread over List assignments.


Of course, it should not evaluate the left-hand-sides and the right-hand-sides of the assignments while expanding to Withs.


Any proposals for such a scoping construct? (I'll post my version soon).



Answer



With this helper function:


SetAttributes[partThread, HoldAll];
partThread[l___, rhs_] :=
Join @@ Replace[
MapIndexed[Append[#, First@#2] &, Thread[Hold[{l}]]],

Hold[s_, i_] :> Hold[s = rhs[[i]]],
{1}];

The following modification of LetL seems to work according to your specs:


ClearAll[Let, let];
SetAttributes[{Let, let}, HoldAll];

Let /: Verbatim[SetDelayed][lhs_, rhs : HoldPattern[Let[__, _]]] :=
Block[{With}, Attributes[With] = {HoldAll};
lhs := Evaluate[rhs /. HoldPattern[With[{}, b_]] :> b]

];

Let[args___, body_] := let[{args}, body, {}, {}];

let[{}, body_, {}, _] := With[{}, body];

let[{Set[{s___}, rhs_], rest___}, body_, dec_, syms_] :=
Module[{temp},
partThread[s, temp] /. Hold[d___] :>
let[{temp = rhs, d, rest}, body, dec, syms]

];

let[
{Set[sym_, rhs_], rest___},
body_,
{decs___},
{syms___}
] /; FreeQ[Unevaluated[rhs], Alternatives[syms]] :=
let[{rest}, body, {decs, sym = rhs}, {syms, HoldPattern[sym]}];


let[{args___}, body_, {decs__}, _] :=
Block[{With},
Attributes[With] = {HoldAll};
With[{decs},Evaluate[let[{args}, body, {}, {}]]]
];

This works quite similarly to LetL. What it does in addition to LetL is that it collects previous declarations into auxiliary lists stored as extra arguments of let, so that it can group together disjoint declarations. It also threads over arguments, using the partThread helper function. In all other respects it is the same code as LetL.


Here is your example:


f[x_Integer] := 
Let[range = Range[2] + x, {a, b} = range, c = g[range], h[a, b, c]];


we can check what was generated:


?f

Global`f


  f[x_Integer]:=
With[{range=Range[2]+x},
With[{a=range[[1]],b=range[[2]],c=g[range]},h[a,b,c]]]


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]