Skip to main content

mathlink or wstp - Write C/C++ programs calling Mathematica functions


I need to write a C/C++ program and call some functions in Mathematica especially those like Solve or NDSolve. The problem is that in the Mathematica documentation it seems to me there is no mention about this.


There are plenty of details regarding how to create a C function and then call it from within Mathematica, but in my case I need the opposite.



Maybe I did not read well, but can you explain me how to do this?



Answer



Have a look at this;


http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/guide/MathLinkCLanguageFunctions.html


I haven't used it in C/C++ but it works fine in C# and Java. Basically you create a connection to a Mathematica kernel and then pass it native data types. Works nicely.


Here is some sample code in Java that I used when I first did this;


import com.wolfram.jlink.*;

public class SampleProgram {


public static void main(String[] argv) {

KernelLink ml = null;

try {
ml = MathLinkFactory.createKernelLink(argv);
} catch (MathLinkException e) {
System.out.println("Fatal error opening link: " + e.getMessage());
return;
}


try {
// Get rid of the initial InputNamePacket the kernel will send
// when it is launched.
ml.discardAnswer();

ml.evaluate("< ml.discardAnswer();

ml.evaluate("2+2");

ml.waitForAnswer();

int result = ml.getInteger();
System.out.println("2 + 2 = " + result);

// Here's how to send the same input, but not as a string:
ml.putFunction("EvaluatePacket", 1);
ml.putFunction("Plus", 2);
ml.put(3);
ml.put(3);

ml.endPacket();
ml.waitForAnswer();
result = ml.getInteger();
System.out.println("3 + 3 = " + result);

// If you want the result back as a string, use evaluateToInputForm
// or evaluateToOutputForm. The second arg for either is the
// requested page width for formatting the string. Pass 0 for
// PageWidth->Infinity. These methods get the result in one
// step--no need to call waitForAnswer.

String strResult = ml.evaluateToOutputForm("4+4", 0);
System.out.println("4 + 4 = " + strResult);

} catch (MathLinkException e) {
System.out.println("MathLinkException occurred: " + e.getMessage());
} finally {
ml.close();
}
}
}


The connection string argv should look something like this


String argv = "-linkmode launch -linkname 'C:\\Program Files\\Wolfram Research\\Mathematica\\8.0\\mathkernel.exe'";

http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/JLink/tutorial/WritingJavaProgramsThatUseMathematica.html


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...