Skip to main content

differential equations - Return partial result when MemoryConstrained aborts NDSolve


I use NDSolve to solve a large set (~400) of coupled ODEs. Sometimes, the memory (~4GB) gets filled up, and my computer becomes impossible to work with, because it spends too much time writing to swap and the process can only be killed violently by the OS.



I circumvent this by using MemoryConstrained, but when the solver reaches the memory limit it is simply aborted and does not return the solution it obtained so far. Is there a way to obtain this solution (much like what happens when the solver encounters a singularity or reaches MaxSteps)?


Note: using a hack of the form


 StepMonitor :> If[MemoryInUse[]>...,...]

results in serious computational overhead.



Answer



Borrowing from an example of WhenEvent from the documentation in which a Button is used to stop the integration, I came up with this.


ClearAll[ndsolveMemConstrained];
SetAttributes[ndsolveMemConstrained, HoldFirst];
ndsolveMemConstrained::mlim = "Memory used `` exceeded limit ``.";

ndsolveMemConstrained[(nd_: NDSolve | NDSolveValue)[eqns_, rest___], bytes_] :=
Module[{sol, stop, task, mstart},
mstart = MemoryInUse[];
stop = False;
task = RunScheduledTask[
stop = (ndsolve`mem = MemoryInUse[] - mstart) > bytes,
0.2];
sol = nd[Append[eqns,
WhenEvent[stop,
Message[ndsolveMemConstrained::mlim, ndsolve`mem, bytes];

"StopIntegration"]],
rest];
RemoveScheduledTask[task];
sol]

As a baseline, here is an example DE from the documentation:


NDSolveValue[{D[u[t, x], t, t] == D[u[t, x], x, x], 
u[0, x] == Exp[-10 x^2], Derivative[1, 0][u][0, x] == 0,
u[t, -10] == u[t, 10]}, u, {t, 0, 100}, {x, -10, 10},
Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"] // AbsoluteTiming


(* {10.969550,InterpolatingFunction[{{0.,100.},{\[Ellipsis],-10.,10.,\[Ellipsis]}},<>]} *)

When the memory is not exceeded, it takes about the same amount of time:


ndsolveMemConstrained[
NDSolveValue[{
D[u[t, x], t, t] == D[u[t, x], x, x], u[0, x] == Exp[-10 x^2],
Derivative[1, 0][u][0, x] == 0, u[t, -10] == u[t, 10]},
u, {t, 0, 100}, {x, -10, 10}, Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"],
8000000] // AbsoluteTiming

ndsolve`mem

(* {10.962278, InterpolatingFunction[{{0., 100.}, {..., -10., 10.,...}}, <>]} *)
(* 6992160 *)

When the memory limit is exceeded, there is frequently an extra warning message generated. I assume it has to do with where the solver is when stop is checked. (It's odd that it doesn't always produce the convergence warning.)


ndsolveMemConstrained[
NDSolveValue[{
D[u[t, x], t, t] == D[u[t, x], x, x], u[0, x] == Exp[-10 x^2],
Derivative[1, 0][u][0, x] == 0, u[t, -10] == u[t, 10]},

u, {t, 0, 100}, {x, -10, 10}, Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"],
4000000] // AbsoluteTiming
ndsolve`mem


NDSolveValue::evcvmit: Event location failed to converge to the requested accuracy or precision within 100 iterations between t = 56.32617731294334and t = 56.50060870314276. >>


ndsolveMemConstrained::mlim: Memory used 4158544 exceeded limit 4000000.



(* {5.595887, InterpolatingFunction[{{0., 56.3262}, {..., -10., 10.,...}}, <>]} *)
(* 4047584 *)


You can also monitor memory usage if the following is executed before ndsolveMemConstrained.


Dynamic @ ndsolve`mem

(* 6992160 *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...