Skip to main content

series expansion - Calculating Taylor polynomial of an implicit function given by an equation


I'd like to write a procedure that will take




  1. an equation: F(x,y,z) = 0

  2. chosen variable: x

  3. a point: (a,b)

  4. degree: n


And the output, when exists, should be the Taylor polynomial of degree n of x as an implicit function of y,z given by F(x,y,z) = 0, around (a,b).


For example, calculate Taylor polynomial of degree 2 around (0,0) of z(x,y) , given by Sin[x y z] + x + y + z == 0.


Any ideas?



Answer



To be definite about what the goal is, I'm assuming you want the following result to appear:



Series[f[ x, y, z ] /. 
z -> solution /. {x -> ϵ x, y -> ϵ y}, {ϵ, 0, 3}]


O[ϵ4]



This means the constraint function is zero to the desired order as a function of the variables x and y.


Here is a way to get this result:


f[x_, y_, z_] := Sin[x y z] + x + y + z


n = 3;

solution = Normal[
Simplify@Series[
Simplify[Normal[
InverseSeries[
Series[
Normal[
Series[
f[ϵ x, ϵ y, ϵ z], {ϵ,

0, n}]] /. ϵ -> 1, {z, 0, n}]]] /. {z -> 0,
x -> ϵ x, y -> ϵ y}], {ϵ, 0,
n}]] /. ϵ -> 1

(* ==> -x - y + x y (x + y) *)

In all the expansions I keep track of powers using ϵ, which is set to 1 at the end (see related answer here). The important step is to single out z as an expansion variable in f for which I then construct the inverse series and set it to zero (that's the step with z -> 0 where z actually stands for f because the series has been inverted). The last step is to again construct a series so that I get the powers of x and y nicely arranged.


With the resulting solution, you can check that the first equation that defined the problem is indeed satisfied.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]