Skip to main content

series expansion - Calculating Taylor polynomial of an implicit function given by an equation


I'd like to write a procedure that will take




  1. an equation: F(x,y,z) = 0

  2. chosen variable: x

  3. a point: (a,b)

  4. degree: n


And the output, when exists, should be the Taylor polynomial of degree n of x as an implicit function of y,z given by F(x,y,z) = 0, around (a,b).


For example, calculate Taylor polynomial of degree 2 around (0,0) of z(x,y) , given by Sin[x y z] + x + y + z == 0.


Any ideas?



Answer



To be definite about what the goal is, I'm assuming you want the following result to appear:



Series[f[ x, y, z ] /. 
z -> solution /. {x -> ϵ x, y -> ϵ y}, {ϵ, 0, 3}]


$O[\epsilon^4]$



This means the constraint function is zero to the desired order as a function of the variables x and y.


Here is a way to get this result:


f[x_, y_, z_] := Sin[x y z] + x + y + z


n = 3;

solution = Normal[
Simplify@Series[
Simplify[Normal[
InverseSeries[
Series[
Normal[
Series[
f[ϵ x, ϵ y, ϵ z], {ϵ,

0, n}]] /. ϵ -> 1, {z, 0, n}]]] /. {z -> 0,
x -> ϵ x, y -> ϵ y}], {ϵ, 0,
n}]] /. ϵ -> 1

(* ==> -x - y + x y (x + y) *)

In all the expansions I keep track of powers using ϵ, which is set to 1 at the end (see related answer here). The important step is to single out z as an expansion variable in f for which I then construct the inverse series and set it to zero (that's the step with z -> 0 where z actually stands for f because the series has been inverted). The last step is to again construct a series so that I get the powers of x and y nicely arranged.


With the resulting solution, you can check that the first equation that defined the problem is indeed satisfied.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...