Skip to main content

sorting - Sort data after specific ordering (ascending/descending) in multiple columns


I have some data:


data={{"a", 1, 1}, {"a", 1, 2}, {"a", 1, 3}, 
{"c", 2, 1}, {"b", 2, 2}, {"b", 2, 3},
{"c", 3, 1}, {"a", 3, 2}, {"a", 3, 3}}


When I use:


Sort[data]

I get the list ordered in incremental order first with column 1 then by 2 and last by the third. Suppose I want the first column in increasing order but the second in decreasing order and the third again in increasing order. How do I do that?


I tried with Sort and SortBy but I haven't managed to make it work.


The output should be:



a 3 2


a 3 3



a 1 1


a 1 2


a 1 3


b 2 2


b 2 3


c 3 1


c 2 1




Answer





Caveat lector: Incorrect results are generated by this solution, e.g.,


sortByColumn[{{"a", 1, 1}, {"b", 2, 3}, {"a", 3, 2}}, {1, 1, -1}]


returns


{{"a", 1, 1}, {"b", 2, 3}, {"a", 3, 2}}


when the correct result is obviously


{{"a", 1, 1}, {"a", 3, 2}, {"b", 2, 3}}


I've commented on the answer to bring it to the attention of the author, however seeing as they've not been here in some time, I'm also putting this here: I think a highly upvoted and accepted answer needs to be correct. - ciao



Here is my contribution, which has the following benefits over previous answers:




  • It sorts both numbers and non-numeric structures

  • You can sort any column (not just the first, followed by the second, etc)

  • You can sort in either direction (ascending / descending)

  • Original order is kept: if you sort on the second column, the first entry will follow the order of the original list. See the example with {0,-1}

  • Edit also allow specifying the priority of the columns. So given {-1,1} for the ordering, you can specify {1,2} to give the higher priority to the second column.


The code is as follows, including my usage code for my own comments.


Clear[sortByColumn]
sortByColumn::usage =
"Arguments: [Table, Direction, Priority]. Returns the list sorted \

by the directions for each column specified in `Direction`. For \
ascending order, use `1`, and for descending order, use `-1`. For \
sorting more than one column, input `Direction` as a list. For \
example, Direction={-1,1} will sort the first column in descending \
order followed by the second column in ascending order, ignoring any \
other column. To sort on the second column, use {0,1} for the syntax.

When sorting two or more columns, you can provide the `Priority` \
for which column should be sorted first. For example, \
`sortByColumn[data,{-1,1},{1,2}]` would sort first in ascending order \

on the second column (because it has a higher priority) and then in \
descending order on the first column.";

sortByColumn[list_?MatrixQ, dir : _Integer | {__Integer}, priority_: {}] :=
Module[{l = Length@list[[1, All]], w, p, d},
w = Reverse@Range@l;
p = If[Length@priority > 0, PadRight[Flatten@{priority}, l],
p = Range@l];
w = w[[Ordering@p]];
d = PadRight[Flatten@{dir}, l];

Sort[list, NonNegative@Total[(w d MapThread[Order, {##}])] &]]

For example, using the data set provided by Mr. Wizard:


data={{"a", 1, 1}, {"a", 1, 5}, {"a", 1, 3}, 
{"c", 2, 1}, {"b", 2, 2}, {"b", 2, 3},
{"c", 3, 1}, {"a", 3, 2}, {"a", 3, 3}};
data[[All, 2]] = data[[All, 2]] /. {1 -> "q", 2 -> "r", 3 -> "s"};

Here are the results of some trial runs. First the original:


{a,q,1}

{a,q,2}
{a,q,3}
{c,r,1}
{b,r,2}
{b,r,3}
{c,s,1}
{a,s,2}
{a,s,3}

The result of sortByColumn[data,-1].



{c,r,1}
{c,s,1}
{b,r,2}
{b,r,3}
{a,q,1}
{a,q,2}
{a,q,3}
{a,s,2}
{a,s,3}


Result of sortByColumn[data,{0,-1}]


{c,s,1}
{a,s,2}
{a,s,3}
{c,r,1}
{b,r,2}
{b,r,3}
{a,q,1}
{a,q,2}
{a,q,3}


And finally, the result the OP wanted, sortByColumn[data,{1,-1,1}]


{a,s,2}
{a,s,3}
{a,q,1}
{a,q,2}
{a,q,3}
{b,r,2}
{b,r,3}
{c,s,1}

{c,r,1}

An example showing the use of the priority argument: sortByColumn[data, {-1, 1}, {1, 2}]


{a,q,1}
{a,q,5}
{a,q,3}
{c,r,1}
{b,r,2}
{b,r,3}
{c,s,1}

{a,s,2}
{a,s,3}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

What is and isn't a valid variable specification for Manipulate?

I have an expression whose terms have arguments (representing subscripts), like this: myExpr = A[0] + V[1,T] I would like to put it inside a Manipulate to see its value as I move around the parameters. (The goal is eventually to plot it wrt one of the variables inside.) However, Mathematica complains when I set V[1,T] as a manipulated variable: Manipulate[Evaluate[myExpr], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, T], 0, 1}] (*Manipulate::vsform: Manipulate argument {V[1,T],0,1} does not have the correct form for a variable specification. >> *) As a workaround, if I get rid of the symbol T inside the argument, it works fine: Manipulate[ Evaluate[myExpr /. T -> 15], {A[0], 0, 1}, {V[1, 15], 0, 1}] Why this behavior? Can anyone point me to the documentation that says what counts as a valid variable? And is there a way to get Manpiulate to accept an expression with a symbolic argument as a variable? Investigations I've done so far: I tried using variableQ from this answer , but it says V[1...