Skip to main content

contexts - How do I create and use Mathematica packages?


I have created a package following the tutorial in Mathematica 8 virtual book. However this tutorial is quite, let's call it, "short". I have a TestPackage.m file:


BeginPackage["TestPackage`"];
TestPackage::usage = "Test package"

Begin["`Private`"]
TestPackage[1] := {1}
(*private functions and stuff*)
Mesg := Print["Private function of TestPackage"]

End[]

TestPackage` f[x_] := Module[{a = 3, b = 3}, Mesg; a x^b]

EndPackage[]

and a file UseTestPackage.nb that uses the package:


ClearAll["Global`*"]
dir = "C:/...and so on"
Get["TestPackage`", Path -> dir]


f[2] (*this should give an output defined in TestPackage.m, but it doesn't*)

$ContextPath

(* {"PacletManager`", "WebServices`", "System`", "Global`"}*)
(*seems it didn't read the m file*)

but nothing happens. No symbols of functions are exported, despite the fact that Get[] doesn't throw an error.


How do I make it work?




Answer



Your specific problem looks like you somehow managed to not load the package properly (did you evaluate Get[...]?). There's also an excess space in your long-form call to f (just before EndPackage[]) that will give you an error.


Although your package will work if you fix the typo, this is not in general a good way to define your function. To see why, try:


<<"path/to/TestPackage.m"
Names["TestPackage`*"]
(* {"a", "a$", "b", "b$", "f", "Mesg", "TestPackage", "x"} *)

Your private symbols are now polluting your package's context.




In general, the way to do this is to put all your definitions and auxiliary symbols in the private context and "expose" only those that you need publicly. All that needs to be done for this is to just have the symbol in some definition before beginning the private context and this is typically done with a usage definition. Here's a modification of your example above:



BeginPackage["TestPackage`"];
f::usage = "My function"

Begin["`Private`"]
Mesg := Print["Private function of TestPackage"]
f[x_] := Module[{a = 3, b = 3}, Mesg; a x^b]
End[]

EndPackage[]


Now, in a notebook, evaluate:


<< "path/to/TestPackage.m"
f[2]
(* Private function of TestPackage
24 *)

which gives you your desired result.


Note how I exposed only f and not Mesg, because the latter (as an example) is not essential to the outside world. You can see that indeed only this is "known" to the outside world:


Names["TestPackage`*"]
(* {f} *)


However, all symbols can always be accessed with their full context path. For example, you can access Mesg as:


TestPackage`Private`Mesg
(* Private function of TestPackage *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...