Skip to main content

contexts - How do I create and use Mathematica packages?


I have created a package following the tutorial in Mathematica 8 virtual book. However this tutorial is quite, let's call it, "short". I have a TestPackage.m file:


BeginPackage["TestPackage`"];
TestPackage::usage = "Test package"

Begin["`Private`"]
TestPackage[1] := {1}
(*private functions and stuff*)
Mesg := Print["Private function of TestPackage"]

End[]

TestPackage` f[x_] := Module[{a = 3, b = 3}, Mesg; a x^b]

EndPackage[]

and a file UseTestPackage.nb that uses the package:


ClearAll["Global`*"]
dir = "C:/...and so on"
Get["TestPackage`", Path -> dir]


f[2] (*this should give an output defined in TestPackage.m, but it doesn't*)

$ContextPath

(* {"PacletManager`", "WebServices`", "System`", "Global`"}*)
(*seems it didn't read the m file*)

but nothing happens. No symbols of functions are exported, despite the fact that Get[] doesn't throw an error.


How do I make it work?




Answer



Your specific problem looks like you somehow managed to not load the package properly (did you evaluate Get[...]?). There's also an excess space in your long-form call to f (just before EndPackage[]) that will give you an error.


Although your package will work if you fix the typo, this is not in general a good way to define your function. To see why, try:


<<"path/to/TestPackage.m"
Names["TestPackage`*"]
(* {"a", "a$", "b", "b$", "f", "Mesg", "TestPackage", "x"} *)

Your private symbols are now polluting your package's context.




In general, the way to do this is to put all your definitions and auxiliary symbols in the private context and "expose" only those that you need publicly. All that needs to be done for this is to just have the symbol in some definition before beginning the private context and this is typically done with a usage definition. Here's a modification of your example above:



BeginPackage["TestPackage`"];
f::usage = "My function"

Begin["`Private`"]
Mesg := Print["Private function of TestPackage"]
f[x_] := Module[{a = 3, b = 3}, Mesg; a x^b]
End[]

EndPackage[]


Now, in a notebook, evaluate:


<< "path/to/TestPackage.m"
f[2]
(* Private function of TestPackage
24 *)

which gives you your desired result.


Note how I exposed only f and not Mesg, because the latter (as an example) is not essential to the outside world. You can see that indeed only this is "known" to the outside world:


Names["TestPackage`*"]
(* {f} *)


However, all symbols can always be accessed with their full context path. For example, you can access Mesg as:


TestPackage`Private`Mesg
(* Private function of TestPackage *)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]