Skip to main content

list manipulation - How to define even permutations correctly?


I define even permutations as following, but there may be some error. I use it in two different way and get different output.


evenper[x_] := Select[Permutations[x], Signature[#] == 1 &]

Way 1:


evenper[x_] := Select[Permutations[x], Signature[#] == 1 &]
manual=evenper[{a, b, c, d}]
phi = 1.61803398875;

p1 = manual /. {a -> phi, b -> 1, c -> 1/phi, d -> 0};
p2 = manual /. {a -> phi, b -> 1, c -> -1/phi, d -> 0};
p3 = manual /. {a -> phi, b -> -1, c -> 1/phi, d -> 0};
p4 = manual /. {a -> phi, b -> -1, c -> -1/phi, d -> 0};
p5 = manual /. {a -> -phi, b -> 1, c -> 1/phi, d -> 0};
p6 = manual /. {a -> -phi, b -> 1, c -> -1/phi, d -> 0};
p7 = manual /. {a -> -phi, b -> -1, c -> 1/phi, d -> 0};
p8 = manual /. {a -> -phi, b -> -1, c -> -1/phi, d -> 0};
list1=Union[p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6, p7, p8]//Sort;


This result is what I want.


Way 2:


evenper[x_] := Select[Permutations[x], Signature[#] == 1 &]

phi = 1.61803398875;
list20 = #*{phi, 1, 1/phi, 0} & /@ (Tuples[{{1, -1}, {1, -1}, {1, -1}, {1}}]);
list2 = Flatten[evenper[#] & /@ list20, 1] // Sort;

But you will find list1 != list2 as following


Position[list1, {-1.618033988749895`, 0, 0.6180339887498948`, -1}]

Position[list2, {-1.618033988749895`, 0, 0.6180339887498948`, -1}]
(*{}*)
(*{{6}}*)

Answer



Thanks for updating your Question. With the new, clearer example I believe I can see the issue.


Analysis


The first method uses evenper on Symbolic values that are in canonical order:


r1 = evenper[{a, b, c, d}]



{{a, b, c, d}, {a, c, d, b}, {a, d, b, c}, {b, a, d, c}, {b, c, a, d}, {b, d, c, a},
 {c, a, b, d}, {c, b, d, a}, {c, d, a, b}, {d, a, c, b}, {d, b, a, c}, {d, c, b, a}}

Recalling the definition of Signature



Signature[list]
    gives the signature of the permutation needed to place the elements of list in canonical order.



We cannot therefore expect the same permutations to be selected if evenper is used on on elements that are not in canonical order:


rls = {a -> 2, b -> 1, c -> 3, d -> 4};

r2 = evenper[{a, b, c, d} /. rls]
r2 /. Reverse[rls, 2]
% === r1


{{2, 1, 4, 3}, {2, 3, 1, 4}, {2, 4, 3, 1}, {1, 2, 3, 4}, {1, 3, 4, 2}, {1, 4, 2, 3},
 {3, 2, 4, 1}, {3, 1, 2, 4}, {3, 4, 1, 2}, {4, 2, 1, 3}, {4, 1, 3, 2}, {4, 3, 2, 1}}

{{a, b, d, c}, {a, c, b, d}, {a, d, c, b}, {b, a, c, d}, {b, c, d, a}, {b, d, a, c},
 {c, a, d, b}, {c, b, a, d}, {c, d, b, a}, {d, a, b, c}, {d, b, c, a}, {d, c, a, b}}


False

Solution


If you wish to apply a certain set of permutations to arbitrary expressions, regardless of their canonical ordering, you can first permute a list of indices (natural numbers) and then use Part to extract them from the expression list:


Select[Permutations @ Range @ 3, Signature[#] == 1 &]
{z, a, p}[[#]] & /@ %


{{1, 2, 3}, {2, 3, 1}, {3, 1, 2}}


{{z, a, p}, {a, p, z}, {p, z, a}}

Applied to your problem:


perms = Select[Permutations @ Range @ 4, Signature[#] == 1 &];

phi = 1.61803398875;

tup = # {phi, 1, 1/phi, 0} & /@ Tuples[{1, -1}, 4];


result = Union @@ Outer[Part, tup, perms, 1];

result == list1


True


As rasher informed me in a comment a greatly improved method for Mathematica 8 or later is to use AlternatingGroup and Permute as follows:


fn = # ~Permute~ AlternatingGroup[Length @ #] &;


fn @ {z, a, p}


{{z, a, p}, {a, p, z}, {p, z, a}}

perms === fn @ Range @ 4


True


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.
Post a Comment
Read more