Skip to main content

syntax - Why aren't parentheses ( ) an expression in Mathematica?


Why aren't parentheses ( ) an expression in Mathematica?


Can I get an expression in a form where parentheses are represented by an expression?



Answer




As djp explains parentheses are unnecessary in the FullForm of an expression; it is logical for superfluous information to be removed.


However if you want parentheses to persist you could use something like this:


$PreRead = # /. RowBox[{"(", body___, ")"}] :> RowBox[{"paren", "[", body, "]"}] &;

MakeBoxes[paren[body___], form_] :=
MakeBoxes[{body}, form] /.
RowBox[{"{", x___, "}"}] :> RowBox[{"(", x, ")"}]

Now:


foo[(bar), (1 + 2) + 5]



foo[(bar), 5 + (3)]

The FullForm of which is: foo[paren[bar], Plus[5, paren[3]]]


Also:


(1, 2, 3)
% // FullForm



(123)

paren[1,2,3]

()
% // FullForm


()


paren[]

You could add rules as desired to handle the head paren.


Note: before taking this rather unusual step consider using the existing functionality of AngleBracket.




Sidebar: Box form manipulation


LLlAMnYP commented:



I'm even surprised that the replacement rules in the answer below work at all. It prompts me to ask "how does M even apply replacement rules before parsing the expression?"




To understand what is being done with $PreRead and MakeBoxes and the rules on RowBox one must understand how Box form is used by Mathematica. As the documentation states:



All textual and graphical forms in Mathematica are ultimately represented in terms of nested collections of boxes.



Input is converted into Boxes by the Front End using functionality that may be accessed by this method that John Fultz revealed, which I package as:


parseString[s_String, prep : (True | False) : True] := 
FrontEndExecute[FrontEnd`UndocumentedTestFEParserPacket[s, prep]]

For example:


parseString @ "(1,2,3)"



{BoxData[RowBox[{"(", RowBox[{"1", ",", "2", ",", "3"}], ")"}]], StandardForm}

This Box data is then sent to the Kernel where $PreRead, if defined, is applied before further processing. (Note: CellEvaluationFunction is a lower level hook that is applied before $PreRead.)


Recalling that "all textual and graphical forms ... are ... represented in ... boxes" the output expression must be converted back to Box form before it is sent to the Front End for display, and MakeBoxes lets us attach rules to this process. It is more flexible than Format and more robust when we want to use output as input as Michael Pilat explained.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1....