Skip to main content

syntax - Why aren't parentheses ( ) an expression in Mathematica?


Why aren't parentheses ( ) an expression in Mathematica?


Can I get an expression in a form where parentheses are represented by an expression?



Answer




As djp explains parentheses are unnecessary in the FullForm of an expression; it is logical for superfluous information to be removed.


However if you want parentheses to persist you could use something like this:


$PreRead = # /. RowBox[{"(", body___, ")"}] :> RowBox[{"paren", "[", body, "]"}] &;

MakeBoxes[paren[body___], form_] := 
  MakeBoxes[{body}, form] /.
    RowBox[{"{", x___, "}"}] :> RowBox[{"(", x, ")"}]

Now:


foo[(bar), (1 + 2) + 5]



foo[(bar), 5 + (3)]

The FullForm of which is: foo[paren[bar], Plus[5, paren[3]]]


Also:


(1, 2, 3)
% // FullForm



(123)

paren[1,2,3]

()
% // FullForm


()


paren[]

You could add rules as desired to handle the head paren.


Note: before taking this rather unusual step consider using the existing functionality of AngleBracket.



Sidebar: Box form manipulation


LLlAMnYP commented:



I'm even surprised that the replacement rules in the answer below work at all. It prompts me to ask "how does M even apply replacement rules before parsing the expression?"




To understand what is being done with $PreRead and MakeBoxes and the rules on RowBox one must understand how Box form is used by Mathematica. As the documentation states:



All textual and graphical forms in Mathematica are ultimately represented in terms of nested collections of boxes.



Input is converted into Boxes by the Front End using functionality that may be accessed by this method that John Fultz revealed, which I package as:


parseString[s_String, prep : (True | False) : True] := 
  FrontEndExecute[FrontEnd`UndocumentedTestFEParserPacket[s, prep]]

For example:


parseString @ "(1,2,3)"



{BoxData[RowBox[{"(", RowBox[{"1", ",", "2", ",", "3"}], ")"}]], StandardForm}

This Box data is then sent to the Kernel where $PreRead, if defined, is applied before further processing. (Note: CellEvaluationFunction is a lower level hook that is applied before $PreRead.)


Recalling that "all textual and graphical forms ... are ... represented in ... boxes" the output expression must be converted back to Box form before it is sent to the Front End for display, and MakeBoxes lets us attach rules to this process. It is more flexible than Format and more robust when we want to use output as input as Michael Pilat explained.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

mathematical optimization - Minimizing using indices, error: Part::pkspec1: The expression cannot be used as a part specification

I want to use Minimize where the variables to minimize are indices pointing into an array. Here a MWE that hopefully shows what my problem is. vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@ { Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; Minimize[{Total@((vec1[[#]] - vec2[[u[#]]])^2 & /@ Range[1, 3]), cons}, vars, Integers] The error I get: Part::pkspec1: The expression u[1] cannot be used as a part specification. >> Answer Ok, it seems that one can get around Mathematica trying to evaluate vec2[[u[1]]] too early by using the function Indexed[vec2,u[1]] . The working MWE would then look like the following: vars = u@# & /@ Range[3]; cons = Flatten@{ Table[(u[j] != #) & /@ vars[[j + 1 ;; -1]], {j, 1, 3 - 1}], 1 vec1 = {1, 2, 3}; vec2 = {1, 2, 3}; NMinimize[ {Total@((vec1[[#]] - Indexed[vec2, u[#]])^2 & /@ R...
Post a Comment
Read more

functions - Get leading series expansion term?

Given a function f[x] , I would like to have a function leadingSeries that returns just the leading term in the series around x=0 . For example: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x)] x and leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x^3)/4)/(4 + x)] -(1/(16 x^3)) Is there such a function in Mathematica? Or maybe one can implement it efficiently? EDIT I finally went with the following implementation, based on Carl Woll 's answer: lds[ex_,x_]:=( (ex/.x->(x+O[x]^2))/.SeriesData[U_,Z_,L_List,Mi_,Ma_,De_]:>SeriesData[U,Z,{L[[1]]},Mi,Mi+1,De]//Quiet//Normal) The advantage is, that this one also properly works with functions whose leading term is a constant: lds[Exp[x],x] 1 Answer Update 1 Updated to eliminate SeriesData and to not return additional terms Perhaps you could use: leadingSeries[expr_, x_] := Normal[expr /. x->(x+O[x]^2) /. a_List :> Take[a, 1]] Then for your examples: leadingSeries[(1/x + 2)/(4 + 1/x^2 + x), x] leadingSeries[Exp[x], x] leadingSeries[(1/x + 2 + (1 - 1/x...
Post a Comment
Read more

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]
Post a Comment
Read more