Skip to main content

numerics - How to make Mathematica try harder to perform symbolic comparisons?


(I suspect this question is a duplicate, but I didn't find a sufficiently similar question with an answer to it.)


I'm having trouble with comparisons of symbolic Reals that are equal, but which Mathematica has trouble recognising them as equal, apparently because it uses N to compare these (apparently after some simple symbolic manipulation). Typically these issues creep up in conditions like one (greatly simplified) below:


x > y /. {x -> Sqrt[(2 - Sqrt[3])^2 + (-3 + 2*Sqrt[3])^2], y -> 4 - 2*Sqrt[3]}


N::meprec: "Internal precision limit $MaxExtraPrecision = 50.` reached while evaluating -4+2\ Sqrt[3]+Sqrt[(2-Sqrt[3])^2+(-3+2 Sqrt[3])^2]."


Sqrt[(2 - Sqrt[3])^2 + (-3 + 2*Sqrt[3])^2] > 4 - 2*Sqrt[3]




This is in no way undocumented feature; it is discussed under Possible Issues section of $MaxExtraPrecision.


What I really want is Mathematica to try a bit harder on solving these (in)equalities numerically in a block of code. How do I accomplish this? As a workaround for specific problem above, this does work (while Simplify on inequality part doesn't):


x > y /. Simplify @ {x -> Sqrt[(2 - Sqrt[3])^2 + (-3 + 2*Sqrt[3])^2], y -> 4 - 2*Sqrt[3]}


False



I would be happy to see a solution that could wrap up around a block of code, and which could possibly work also on non-algebraics that FullSimplify can handle.


EDIT:


To clarify my question: I want first example to evaluate like the expression below, and in general Greater to evaluate for NumericQ argument list similarly inside a code block where I want this feature to be used:



  Simplify[Sqrt[(2 - Sqrt[3])^2 + (-3 + 2*Sqrt[3])^2]] > Simplify[4 - 2*Sqrt[3]]


False




Answer



This solution uses trick to redefine internal functions presented in this earlier answer by Leonid Shifrin.


(* Code run as an argument of WithFullySimplifiedComparisons tries
harder to symbolically resolve equality and inequality tests. *)


ClearAll[WithFullySimplifiedComparisons];
WithFullySimplifiedComparisons =
Module[
{withReplacedFunctions, fullSimplifiedTest, testMappings,
splitInequality, wrapper},

(* Runs code with functions in { old -> new, ... } mappings list
executing new function in place of old, but old definitions
working inside new implementations. *)


SetAttributes[withReplacedFunctions, HoldRest];
withReplacedFunctions[mappings_List, code_] :=
Module[{outer = True},
Internal`InheritedBlock[Evaluate@mappings[[All, 1]],
(Unprotect[#1];
#1[args___] :=
Block[{outer = False}, #2[args]] /; outer;
Protect[#1];) & @@@ mappings;
code]];


(* Returns a version of comparison function fun that attempts to
simplify numeric comparisons in domain dom with FullSimplify. *)

fullySimplifiedTest[fun_, dom_] :=
Module[{test},
test[] := True;
test[_] := True;
test[a_, b_, r___] :=
With[{bn = FullSimplify[b]},
If[fun[0, FullSimplify[bn - a]],

test[bn, r], False, test[a, bn] && test[bn, r]]] /;
NumericQ[a] && NumericQ[b] && (a | b) \[Element] dom;
test[a_, b_, r___] := fun[a, b] && test[b, r];
test];

(* Mappings for normal comparison functions. *)

testMappings =
#1 -> fullySimplifiedTest[##] & @@@
Join[{#, Complexes} & /@ {Equal, Unequal},

{#, Reals} & /@ {Greater, GreaterEqual, Less, LessEqual}];

(* Conversion function from Inequality to chain of simple tests. *)

splitInequality[_] := True;
splitInequality[a_, test_, b_, r___] := test[a, b] && splitInequality[b, r];

(* Actual wrapper to be used.
splitInequality uses new comparison functions. *)


SetAttributes[wrapper, HoldFirst];
wrapper[code_] :=
withReplacedFunctions[testMappings,
withReplacedFunctions[{Inequality -> splitInequality},
code]];

wrapper];

Now earlier problematic tests can run purely symbolically:


WithFullySimplifiedComparisons[

x > y /. {x -> Sqrt[(2 - Sqrt[3])^2 + (-3 + 2*Sqrt[3])^2], y -> 4 - 2*Sqrt[3]}]


False



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

calculus and analysis - Integral of the Sinc product

Let us consider the following integral $$ B_n = \int_0^\infty \prod_{k=1,3,5,\dots}^n\frac{\sin (x/k)}{x/k}dx $$ By definition, Sinc[x] == Sin[x]/x , therefore B[n_?OddQ] := Integrate[Product[Sinc[x/k], {k, 1, n, 2}], {x, 0, Infinity}] B /@ Range[1, 13, 2] {Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2, Pi/2} OK, everything is fine. But... B[15] 467807924713440738696537864469 Pi/935615849440640907310521750000 What's going on? Answer As Eckhard wrote in comments B[n] is the n-th Borwein integral . (The letter B was not accidental :) ) This funny properties of Borwein integrals is related to the Fourier transform of Sinc function FourierTransform[Sinc[x], x, k] 1/2 Sqrt[Pi/2] (Sign[1 - k] + Sign[1 + k]) Plot[%, {k, -2, 2}, Filling -> 0] which is the box function. The result is $\pi/2$ while the sum $$ 1/3+1/5+\dots+1/n $$ B_n = \frac{\pi}{2} - \pi \bigg(\sum_{k=3,5,\ldots}^n\frac{1}{k} -1\biggr)^\frac{n-1}{2}\prod_{k=3,5,\dots}^n\frac{k}{k-1}. $$ For $n=15$ it is equal to $$ \frac{46780...