Skip to main content

plotting - Combine Plots into a single non-rasterized Graphic with no spacing



Suppose that I have two plots, pl1 and pl2:


pl1 = Plot[x, {x, 0, 1}, Frame -> True, ImageSize -> 350]
pl2 = Plot[x^2, {x, 0, 1}, Frame -> True, ImageSize -> 350]

pl1


pl2


I would like to (1) combine these plots side-by-side in a (2) non-rasterized graphic with (3) no spacing.


I get pretty close to my desired result by using Grid with Spacings -> 0:



Grid[{{pl1, pl2}}, Spacings -> 0]

grid


The above satisfies my requirements (2) and (3): the result is non-rasterized, and there is no spacing between the plots. However, the above doesn't satisfy my requirement (1), that the plots be combined into a single Graphic object. That is, if I click on either of the plots, I see that they are separate Graphic objects:


gridA


gridB


So the above approach doesn't satisfy all of my requirements. (Why do I need the plots to be combined in a single Graphic? The reason is that I want to be able to place other Graphic objects -- e.g., text, arrows, shapes, etc. -- that span the two plots.)


Another possibility is to use ImageAssemble, but unfortunately this leads to a rasterized image:


ImageAssemble[{{pl1, pl2}}]


imageassemble


A third possibility is to use GraphicsGrid with Spacings -> 0:


GraphicsGrid[{{pl1, pl2}}, Spacings -> 0]

graphicsgrid


It seems that this produces a single Graphic object ((1)) that is not rasterized ((2)), but, unfortunately, there is spacing between the plots.


Do you have any suggestions? Is there any way to remove the spacing/padding in GraphicsGrid?



Answer



You could do something like the following:


pl1=Plot[x,{x,0,1},Frame->True,ImageSize->350, 

ImagePadding->{{Scaled[0.05],None},{Automatic,Automatic}}];
pl2=Plot[x^2,{x,0,1},Frame->True,ImageSize->350,
ImagePadding-> {{None,Scaled[0.05]},{Automatic,Automatic}}];

GraphicsGrid[{{pl1,pl2}},Spacings->{Scaled[-0.07],0}]

enter image description here


This removes the padding from the graphics themselves with the option ImagePadding, and a magic number of -0.07...There is likely a better way.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...

Is there a way to do conditional matrix loop using 'continue'

I have the following: n = 3; m = 5; ww = RandomReal[{0, 0.1}, {n, n}]; uu = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {m, n}]; pp = RandomReal[{0, 1}, {n, n}]; ss = RandomInteger[{0, 5}, {m, n}]; Grid[{{"ww", "uu", "pp", "ss"}, {ww // TableForm, uu // TableForm, pp // TableForm, ss // TableForm}}, Spacings -> {5, 2}, Dividers -> All] where I would like to look at every element of matrix ss and produce a matrix tt , with zeroes at the locations in ss which have zeroes, and in all other positions do the following: tt = (-1/Subscript[ww, m]) Log[(1 - uu)/(Subscript[pp, m - 1])], where Subscript[ww, m] is the value at index of ww matrix and where Subscript[pp, m - 1] is the value at index-1 of pp matrix. So for example if the first value ever read from matrix ss happens to be 2, then value taken from matrix ww would be from the row 2, but from pp would be from row 1. Also how to tell difference between a 0 as a valid value from within the matrix elemen...