Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Compute Hessian of function symbolically


This question could equally apply to the computation of other symbolic transformations of a function, but I use the Hessian as an example here.


Consider a two-variable function fun which could be defined either using down-values or as a Function. It may or may not contain symbolic parameters.


Compute the Hessian of fun and return it as a Function. The symbolic computation must already be done and the result embedded in the result function. This function will be used for multiple numerical evaluations later.





One possible way to do this is:


hessian[fun_] := 
Block[{hess, x, y},
Function[{x, y}, hess] /. hess -> D[fun[x, y], {{x, y}, 2}]
]

What's wrong with this? Consider cases when fun may contain parameters (which in my case will usually be global variables with their value already set). What if these conflict with the Block variables?


x = 5;
hessian[Function[{a, b}, x a^3 + b^3]]
(* Function[{x, y}, {{12 x^2, 0}, {0, 6 y}}] *)


p = 5;
hessian[Function[{a, b}, p a^3 + b^3]]
(* Function[{x, y}, {{30 x, 0}, {0, 6 y}}] *)

One workaround is to make these live in a context that is not user-accessible, e.g.


hessian[fun_] := 
Block[{hessian`hess, hessian`x, hessian`y},
Function[{hessian`x, hessian`y}, hessian`hess] /.
hessian`hess ->

D[fun[hessian`x, hessian`y], {{hessian`x, hessian`y}, 2}]]

But this is getting ugly quickly. What is a better way?



Answer



I think this should be fine, the full form doesn't look neat with x$123 etc but that doesn't matter:


hessian[fun_] := Module[{x, y}, 
Function @@ {{x, y}, D[fun[x, y], {{x, y}, 2}]}
]

this will work too:



 ... Function[{x, y}, Evaluate @ D[fun[x, y], {{x, y}, 2}]] ...

and will work even nicer because the outer Module will rename Function's variables to x$ without numbers.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

equation solving - Invert and fit implicitly defined curve

I need to fit an implicitly defined curve. I thought I could get some data out of Solve , and then using FindFit . Therefore, I would like to find the relation the parametric curve defined by $F(x,y)=0$: Solve[-(1/2) + 1/2 (0.41202 BesselK[0, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]] + (0.101483 x BesselK[1, 0.1 Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]])/Sqrt[x^2 + y^2]) == 0, y] But I can't get an output: Solve was unable to solve the system with inexact coefficients or the system obtained by direct rationalization of inexact numbers present in the system. Since many of the methods used by Solve require exact input, providing Solve with an exact version of the system may help. >> Edit: In particular, I would like to fit the data coming from the curve with the expression of another curve, and not with a function $f(x)$. In particular, since this clearly looks like a cardioid , I would like it to fit to something like it. What other strategies could I try?

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...