Skip to main content

calculus and analysis - Compute Hessian of function symbolically


This question could equally apply to the computation of other symbolic transformations of a function, but I use the Hessian as an example here.


Consider a two-variable function fun which could be defined either using down-values or as a Function. It may or may not contain symbolic parameters.


Compute the Hessian of fun and return it as a Function. The symbolic computation must already be done and the result embedded in the result function. This function will be used for multiple numerical evaluations later.





One possible way to do this is:


hessian[fun_] := 
Block[{hess, x, y},
Function[{x, y}, hess] /. hess -> D[fun[x, y], {{x, y}, 2}]
]

What's wrong with this? Consider cases when fun may contain parameters (which in my case will usually be global variables with their value already set). What if these conflict with the Block variables?


x = 5;
hessian[Function[{a, b}, x a^3 + b^3]]
(* Function[{x, y}, {{12 x^2, 0}, {0, 6 y}}] *)


p = 5;
hessian[Function[{a, b}, p a^3 + b^3]]
(* Function[{x, y}, {{30 x, 0}, {0, 6 y}}] *)

One workaround is to make these live in a context that is not user-accessible, e.g.


hessian[fun_] := 
Block[{hessian`hess, hessian`x, hessian`y},
Function[{hessian`x, hessian`y}, hessian`hess] /.
hessian`hess ->

D[fun[hessian`x, hessian`y], {{hessian`x, hessian`y}, 2}]]

But this is getting ugly quickly. What is a better way?



Answer



I think this should be fine, the full form doesn't look neat with x$123 etc but that doesn't matter:


hessian[fun_] := Module[{x, y}, 
Function @@ {{x, y}, D[fun[x, y], {{x, y}, 2}]}
]

this will work too:



 ... Function[{x, y}, Evaluate @ D[fun[x, y], {{x, y}, 2}]] ...

and will work even nicer because the outer Module will rename Function's variables to x$ without numbers.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

plotting - Filling between two spheres in SphericalPlot3D

Manipulate[ SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, Mesh -> None, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], {n, 0, 1}] I cant' seem to be able to make a filling between two spheres. I've already tried the obvious Filling -> {1 -> {2}} but Mathematica doesn't seem to like that option. Is there any easy way around this or ... Answer There is no built-in filling in SphericalPlot3D . One option is to use ParametricPlot3D to draw the surfaces between the two shells: Manipulate[ Show[SphericalPlot3D[{1, 2 - n}, {θ, 0, Pi}, {ϕ, 0, 1.5 Pi}, PlotPoints -> 15, PlotRange -> {-2.2, 2.2}], ParametricPlot3D[{ r {Sin[t] Cos[1.5 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[1.5 Pi], Cos[t]}, r {Sin[t] Cos[0 Pi], Sin[t] Sin[0 Pi], Cos[t]}}, {r, 1, 2 - n}, {t, 0, Pi}, PlotStyle -> Yellow, Mesh -> {2, 15}]], {n, 0, 1}]

plotting - Plot 4D data with color as 4th dimension

I have a list of 4D data (x position, y position, amplitude, wavelength). I want to plot x, y, and amplitude on a 3D plot and have the color of the points correspond to the wavelength. I have seen many examples using functions to define color but my wavelength cannot be expressed by an analytic function. Is there a simple way to do this? Answer Here a another possible way to visualize 4D data: data = Flatten[Table[{x, y, x^2 + y^2, Sin[x - y]}, {x, -Pi, Pi,Pi/10}, {y,-Pi,Pi, Pi/10}], 1]; You can use the function Point along with VertexColors . Now the points are places using the first three elements and the color is determined by the fourth. In this case I used Hue, but you can use whatever you prefer. Graphics3D[ Point[data[[All, 1 ;; 3]], VertexColors -> Hue /@ data[[All, 4]]], Axes -> True, BoxRatios -> {1, 1, 1/GoldenRatio}]

plotting - Mathematica: 3D plot based on combined 2D graphs

I have several sigmoidal fits to 3 different datasets, with mean fit predictions plus the 95% confidence limits (not symmetrical around the mean) and the actual data. I would now like to show these different 2D plots projected in 3D as in but then using proper perspective. In the link here they give some solutions to combine the plots using isometric perspective, but I would like to use proper 3 point perspective. Any thoughts? Also any way to show the mean points per time point for each series plus or minus the standard error on the mean would be cool too, either using points+vertical bars, or using spheres plus tubes. Below are some test data and the fit function I am using. Note that I am working on a logit(proportion) scale and that the final vertical scale is Log10(percentage). (* some test data *) data = Table[Null, {i, 4}]; data[[1]] = {{1, -5.8}, {2, -5.4}, {3, -0.8}, {4, -0.2}, {5, 4.6}, {1, -6.4}, {2, -5.6}, {3, -0.7}, {4, 0.04}, {5, 1.0}, {1, -6.8}, {2, -4.7}, {3, -1.