Skip to main content

Sorting function for non commuting bosons


I am trying to write a sorting function which will sort expressions involving products of bosonic objects which do not commute. For example, I can have objects like $a,\ a^\dagger,\ b,\ b^\dagger$ where $[a,a^\dagger] = 1$, $[b,b^\dagger] = 1$ and all other commutators vanish. So the sorting function should for example sort a term like $a a^\dagger b a b^\dagger$ to $a + a^\dagger a^2 + ab^\dagger b+a^\dagger a^2 b^\dagger b$. So I want to sort them first lexicographically and then such that dagger objects will be to the left.


I have been using a function from the notebook provided by Simon Tyler at arXiv. So I have created a bosonic object using


Clear[Boson, BosonC, BosonA]
Boson /: MakeBoxes[
Boson[cr : (True | False), sym_], fmt_] :=
With[{sbox = If[StringQ[sym], sym, ToBoxes[sym]]},
With[{abox = If[cr, SuperscriptBox[#, FormBox["\[Dagger]", Bold]], #] &@sbox},

InterpretationBox[abox, Boson[cr, sym]]
]
]
BosonA[sym_:"a"] := Boson[False, sym]
BosonC[sym_:"a"] := Boson[True, sym]

Next following the code, I want to turn the atomic expressions into lists and use Mathematica's ordering after that. So I have functions like


NCOrder[Boson[cr : True | False, sym_]] := 
NCOrder[Boson[cr, sym]] = {{sym, Boole[cr]}}


NCSort[expr_] := Module[{temp, NCM},
temp = expr /. NonCommutativeMultiply -> NCM;
temp = temp /. (NCM[a : _Boson ..] :> (NCM[a][[Ordering[#]]] &[NCOrder /@ {a}]));
temp = temp /. NCM[singleArg_] :> singleArg;
temp = temp /. NCM -> NonCommutativeMultiply
]

This NCSort function right now is just ordering it lexicographically. I want to modify it so that it would sort and order the expressions as I explained above.



Answer



I suggest the following function, which looks rather ugly and is not really efficient, but seems to do the job:



expand[expr_] :=
Module[{times},
expr /.
NonCommutativeMultiply[b___] :> times[b] //.
{
times[left___, cnum_ /; FreeQ[cnum, _Boson], right___] :>
cnum*times[left, right],
times[left___, fst : Boson[_, s_], middle__, sec : Boson[_, s_],right___] /;
FreeQ[{middle}, Boson[_, s]] &&
OrderedQ[{Last@Union[Cases[{middle}, Boson[_, sym_] :> sym]], s}] :>

times[left, middle, fst, sec, right],
times[left___, Boson[False, s_], Boson[True, s_], right___] :>
times[left, right] + times[left, Boson[True, s], Boson[False, s], right],
times[b_Boson] :> b
} //.
times[left___, p : Longest[PatternSequence[(b : Boson[type_, s_]) ..]],right___] :>
times[left, b^Length[{p}], right] /.
times[arg__] :> NonCommutativeMultiply[arg] /. times[] -> OverHat[1]
];


You can use it as


expand[NonCommutativeMultiply[BosonA["a"], BosonC["a"], BosonA["b"], BosonA["a"], BosonC["b"]]]

(*
a+a^\[Dagger]**a^2+a**b^\[Dagger]**b+a^\[Dagger]**a^2**b^\[Dagger]**b
*)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

list manipulation - Selecting multiple columns from a matrix?

Sample data: data = { {{2013, 1, 1}, 24.13, 167.67, 231.82}, {{2013, 1, 2}, 32.15, 170.92, 225.99}, {{2013, 1, 3}, 35.43, 172.68, 221.67}, {{2013, 1, 4}, 36.73, 173.05, 218.32}, {{2013, 1, 5}, 58.19, 165.96, 197.05}, {{2013, 1, 6}, 69.99, 163.50, 187.52}, {{2013, 1, 7}, 71.37, 154.21, 175.58}, {{2013, 1, 8}, 72.51, 149.66, 163.25}}; I want a DateListPlot with three graphs, so for a matrix formed by columns 1 and 2, one for columns 1 and 3, and 1 for columns 1 and 4. At the moment I'm using this code: data2 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 2]]}]; data3 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 3]]}]; data4 = Transpose[{data[[All, 1]], data[[All, 4]]}]; DateListPlot[{data2, data3, data4}, Joined -> True, Filling -> {3 -> {1}}] but I have a hunch that this can be done more efficiently. I don't like the Transpose s in particular. Any ideas? edit (for extra credit) What if I need to multiply the second column by 2, which in my solution is simp...

plotting - How to draw lines between specified dots on ListPlot?

I would like to create a plot where I have unconnected dots and some connected. So far, I have figured out how to draw the dots. My code is the following: ListPlot[{{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4,13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full] I have thought using ListLinePlot command, but I don't know how to specify to the command to draw only selected lines between the dots. Do have any suggestions/hints on how to do that? Thank you. Answer One possibility would be to use Epilog with Line : ListPlot[ {{1, 1}, {2, 2}, {3, 3}, {4, 4}, {1, 4}, {2, 5}, {3, 6}, {4, 7}, {1, 7}, {2, 8}, {3, 9}, {4, 10}, {1, 10}, {2, 11}, {3, 12}, {4, 13}, {2.5, 7}}, Ticks -> {{1, 2, 3, 4}, None}, AxesStyle -> Thin, TicksStyle -> Directive[Black, Bold, 12], Mesh -> Full, Epilog -> { Line[ ...

dynamic - How can I make a clickable ArrayPlot that returns input?

I would like to create a dynamic ArrayPlot so that the rectangles, when clicked, provide the input. Can I use ArrayPlot for this? Or is there something else I should have to use? Answer ArrayPlot is much more than just a simple array like Grid : it represents a ranged 2D dataset, and its visualization can be finetuned by options like DataReversed and DataRange . These features make it quite complicated to reproduce the same layout and order with Grid . Here I offer AnnotatedArrayPlot which comes in handy when your dataset is more than just a flat 2D array. The dynamic interface allows highlighting individual cells and possibly interacting with them. AnnotatedArrayPlot works the same way as ArrayPlot and accepts the same options plus Enabled , HighlightCoordinates , HighlightStyle and HighlightElementFunction . data = {{Missing["HasSomeMoreData"], GrayLevel[ 1], {RGBColor[0, 1, 1], RGBColor[0, 0, 1], GrayLevel[1]}, RGBColor[0, 1, 0]}, {GrayLevel[0], GrayLevel...